van Beers, Eduard

AbstractIron overload is a severe general complication of hereditary anemias. Treatment with iron chelators is hampered by important side‐effects, high costs, and the lack of availability in many countries with a high prevalence of hereditary anemias. In this phase III randomized placebo‐controlled trial, we assigned adults with non‐transfusion‐dependent hereditary anemias with mild‐to‐moderate iron overload to receive esomeprazole (at a dose of 40 mg twice daily) or placebo for 12 months in a cross‐over design. The primary end point was change of liver iron content measured by MRI. A total of 30 participants were enrolled in the trial. Treatment with esomeprazole resulted in a statistically significant reduction in liver iron content that was 0.55 mg Fe/g dw larger than after treatment with placebo (95%CI [0.05 to 1.06]; p = 0.03). Median baseline liver iron content at the start of esomeprazole was 4.99 versus 4.49 mg Fe/g dw at start of placebo. Mean delta liver iron content after esomeprazole treatment was −0.57 (SD 1.20) versus −0.11 mg Fe/g dw (SD 0.75) after placebo treatment. Esomeprazole was well tolerated, reported adverse events were mild and none of the patients withdrew from the study due to side effects. In summary, esomeprazole resulted in a significant reduction in liver iron content when compared to placebo in a heterogeneous group of patients with non‐transfusion‐dependent hereditary anemias. From an international perspective this result can have major implications given the fact that proton pump inhibitors may frequently be the only realistic therapy for many patients without access to or not tolerating iron chelators.

Abstract Pyruvate kinase deficiency (PKD) is the most common enzyme defect of glycolysis and an important cause of hereditary, nonspherocytic hemolytic anemia. The disease has a worldwide geographical distribution but there are no verified data regarding its frequency. Difficulties in the diagnostic workflow and interpretation of PK enzyme assay likely play a role. By the creation of a global PKD International Working Group in 2016, involving 24 experts from 20 Centers of Expertise we studied the current gaps in the diagnosis of PKD in order to establish diagnostic guidelines. By means of a detailed survey and subsequent discussions, multiple aspects of the diagnosis of PKD were evaluated and discussed by members of Expert Centers from Europe, USA, and Asia directly involved in diagnosis. Broad consensus was reached among the Centers on many clinical and technical aspects of the diagnosis of PKD. The results of this study are here presented as recommendations for the diagnosis of PKD and used to prepare a diagnostic algorithm. This information might be helpful for other Centers to deliver timely and appropriate diagnosis and to increase awareness in PKD.