Fritz, Ashley V

Abstract OBJECTIVES The effect of allograft ischaemic time (AIT) on postoperative events after lung transplantation remains unclear. This study aims to assess the feasibility of extending the duration of AIT. METHODS The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adult lung transplantation from 4 May 2005 to 30 June 2020. Patients were divided as per AIT into standard ischaemic time (<6 h) and prolonged ischaemic time (≥6 h) groups using propensity score matching and evaluated on a continuous scale using restricted cubic splines. The primary outcome was overall 1-year and 5-year survival. RESULTS Among 11 438 propensity-matched recipients, standard ischaemic time and prolonged ischaemic time showed no differences in overall 1-year (P = 0.29) or 5-year (P = 0.29) survival. Prolonged ischaemic time independently predicted early postoperative ventilator support for >48 h (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.22–1.44), dialysis (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.30–1.84), primary graft dysfunction (PGD; OR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.09–1.50), acute rejection (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.24–1.62), and interestingly, decreased 5-year bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.85–0.97). In relative risk curves, 1-year mortality, prolonged ventilation, dialysis and PGD steadily increased per hour as AIT extended. The risk of acute rejection and 5-year bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome also showed significant changes between 5 and 8 h of AIT. In contrast, 5-year mortality remained constant despite rising AIT. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged AIT worsened early outcomes such as PGD, but improved bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome freedom at later time points. Despite this, both short- and long-term survival were similar between prolonged ischaemic time and standard ischaemic time patients. Dynamic risk changes in post-transplant events should be noted for prolonged ischaemia lung use.

Lung transplantation (LTx) historically was performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or Off-pump. Recent data suggest an increased interest in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as perioperative circulatory support by many lung transplantation centers worldwide. However, there are no established guidelines for anesthetic management for LTx. We present a patient with a history of systemic sclerosis and interstitial lung disease complicated by acute onset of systemic pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure undergoing LTx. We aim to discuss perioperative circulatory support, including ECMO bridge to LTx, and how best to consider the varied intraoperative strategies of CPB vs ECMO vs off-pump during LTx, intraoperative maintenance, and coagulation management.

Purpose of reviewRecent literature has described the emerging role of anesthesiologists as key members of the lung transplantation team and the impact of anesthetic management on outcomes. This review examines the impact of presenting cause of end-stage lung disease (ESLD) on anesthetic management.Recent findingsThe four primary causes of ESLD are suppurative, obstructive, or restrictive processes, and pulmonary hypertension. Our recent review of perioperative literature revealed new data regarding preoperative risk stratification, intraoperative management, and postoperative use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Major studies specifically about anesthetic management are lacking; however, the principles studied are readily applicable to the design of a perioperative care plan. The most compelling data have resulted in a revolutionary change in terms of intraoperative support and postoperative planning for pulmonary hypertension patients. Historically treated with cardiopulmonary bypass, significant data have been reported describing the successful use of ECMO both as an intraoperative support with superior outcomes, as well as postoperative support for improved stability during biventricular remodeling post graft implantation.SummaryThe application of these updated findings should assist anesthesiologists as they develop internal protocols and external guidelines to integrate within multidisciplinary teams caring for the lung transplant patient.

Objectives: Awareness of the impact of bedside ultrasound to reduce iatrogenic pneumothoraces while performing bedside pleural procedures has increased but with little understanding in how ultrasound is used for these procedures. Design and Setting: We conducted a retrospective chart review at a tertiary referral center in the United States from January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2017. Our study assessed adverse effect rates between real-time ultrasound-guided and ultrasound-marked thoracenteses and thoracostomy tube placements. Patients: Three-hundred ninety-four ICU patients were included in this study. Measurements and Main Results: There was a significant difference in the rate of adverse effects between real-time ultrasound-guided (0.63% [95% CI, 0.11–3.4%]) and ultrasound-marked (6.89% [95% CI, 4.15–11.24%]; p ≤ 0.01) procedures. More specifically, the rate of pneumothoraces was different between the two procedures (0.63% [95% CI, 0.11–3.4%] vs 4.43% [95% CI, 2.35–8.21%]; p = 0.02). In patients mechanically ventilated, there was a significant difference in overall adverse effect rates between groups of ultrasound use ( p = 0.01). Conclusions: The use of real-time ultrasound guidance was associated with a lower rate of iatrogenic pneumothoraces.

We present the case of a 37 year old male who presented with new onset dyspnea, tachycardia, palpitations, and chest tightness. His initial work up demonstrated a dilated pulmonary artery with reflux of contrast dye in to the IVC. Transthoracic echocardiogram identified a “windsock” appearance indicating Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) and severe aortic regurgitation. As a result, the patient was taken for emergent surgery where the windsock tissue was surgically repaired with bovine pericardial patch. This case illuminates the uncommon occurrence of SVA and the ability to recognize these findings on multiple imaging modalities including transthoracic, transesophageal two and three dimensional echocardiography as well as direct surgical field visualization.