Grebe, Stefan

Abstract Context Guidelines suggest performing urine steroid profiling in patients with indeterminate adrenal tumors to make a noninvasive diagnosis of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). However, urine steroid profiling is not widely available. Objective To determine the accuracy of clinically available serum 11-deoxycortisol, 17OH-progesterone, and 17OH-pregnenolone in diagnosing ACC. Methods We conducted a prospective single-center cohort study of patients with adrenal masses evaluated between 2015 and 2023. Serum was analyzed by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry for 17OH-pregnenolone, 17OH-progesterone, and 11-deoxycortisol. Reference standard for adrenal mass included histopathology, imaging characteristics, imaging follow up of 2 years, or clinical follow up of 5 years. Localized Generalized Matrix Learning Vector Quantization analysis was used to develop serum steroid score and assessed with area under receiver operating curve. Results Of 263 patients with adrenal masses, 44 (16.7%) were diagnosed with ACC, 161 (61%) with adrenocortical adenomas (ACAs), 27 (10%) with other adrenal malignancies, and 31 (12%) with other. Hounsfield unit ≥ 20 was demonstrated in all ACCs, in all but 1 other adrenal malignancy, and in 58 (31%) ACAs. All 3 steroids were higher in patients with ACCs vs non-ACCs, including when comparing ACCs with functioning ACAs, and with ACAs with Hounsfield unit ≥ 20 (P < .0001 for all). Localized Generalized Matrix Learning Vector Quantization analysis yielded a serum steroid score that discriminated between ACC and non-ACC groups with a mean threshold fixed area under receiver operating curve of 0.823. Conclusion We showed that measurements of 11-deoxycortisol, 17OH-progesterone, and 17OH-pregnenolone could be valuable in diagnosing ACC. After appropriate validation, serum steroid score could be integrated in clinical practice.

Abstract Context Interpretation of dexamethasone suppression test (DST) may be influenced by dexamethasone absorption and metabolism and by the altered cortisol binding. Objective We aimed to determine the normal ranges of free cortisol during DST in participants without adrenal disorders and to identify the population of patients where post-DST free cortisol measurements add value to the diagnostic workup. Design and Setting Cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary medical center. Participants Adult volunteers without adrenal disorders (n = 168; 47 women on oral contraceptive therapy [OCP], 66 women not on OCP, 55 men) and patients undergoing evaluation for hypercortisolism (n = 196; 16 women on OCP). Measurements Post-DST dexamethasone and free cortisol (mass spectrometry) and total cortisol (immunoassay). Main Outcome Measures Reference range for post-DST free cortisol, diagnostic accuracy of post-DST total cortisol. Results Adequate dexamethasone concentrations (≥0.1 mcg/dL) were seen in 97.6% volunteers and 96.3% patients. Only 25.5% of women volunteers on OCP had abnormal post-DST total cortisol (>1.8 mcg/dL). In volunteers, the upper post-DST free cortisol range was 48 ng/dL in men and women not on OCP, and 79 ng/dL in women on OCP. When compared with post-DST free cortisol, diagnostic accuracy of post-DST total cortisol was 87.3% (95% CI, 81.7-91.7); all false-positive results occurred in patients with post-DST cortisol between 1.8 and 5 mcg/dL. OCP use was the only factor associated with false-positive results (21.1% vs 4.9%, P = 0.02). Conclusions Post-DST free cortisol measurements are valuable in patients with optimal dexamethasone concentrations and post-DST total cortisol between 1.8 and 5 mcg/dL.

Over the past two decades, vitamin D level measurements have become some of the most frequently ordered tests in the laboratory. This increase is due to a growing awareness of widespread vitamin D deficiency and scientific data suggesting the beneficial effects of vitamin D in various diseases. A literature search was carried out in PubMed for cases reporting vitamin D intoxication and overdose. Thirteen articles were included in this review. Intoxication was severe in the reported cases. Patients presented with serum vitamin D concentrations ranging between 150 and 1220 ng/mL and serum calcium concentrations between 11.1 and 23.1 mg/dL. Most of the reported patients showed symptoms of vitamin D toxicity such as vomiting, dehydration, pain, and loss of appetite. The underlying causes included manufacturing errors, overdosing by patients or prescribers, and combinations of these factors. Our literature search highlights the fact that even though vitamin D intoxication is rare, it does occur and therefore patients and prescribers should be more cognizant of the potential dangers of vitamin D overdose.