Halland, M

Linked ContentThis article is linked to Qin et al and Heading papers. To view these articles visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14807 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14838.

Introduction. Idiopathic subglottic stenosis represents a spectrum of subglottic disease without a clear underlying cause. Prior studies have implicated a pathogenic role of gastroesophageal reflux disease in idiopathic subglottic stenosis. The aim of this study was to examine the presence and pattern of gastroesophageal reflux in a large cohort of patients with idiopathic subglottic stenosis at a tertiary referral center. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of patients with idiopathic subglottic stenosis from January 2010 to December 2016 who had undergone combined pH impedance testing. Patients with prior gastric or esophageal surgery were excluded. Data obtained included esophageal acid exposure times, number of reflux events, patient position during reflux events (defined as upright, supine, or mixed), body mass index, and the presence of proton pump inhibitor therapy. Results. 159 patients with the idiopathic subglottic stenosis were identified, of whom 41 had undergone esophageal pH impedance testing. 40 (97.6%) were women, with a mean age of 54.8 (range 31–79) years and BMI of 31.0 (range 17–55). Overall, 19 (46.3%) patients were found to reflux as confirmed by abnormal esophageal acid exposure or abnormal number of reflux events. 15 of the 19 patients with reflux had predominantly upright gastroesophageal reflux disease, whereas 2 had supine and 2 mixed reflux. Discussion. In patients with idiopathic subglottic stenosis who underwent evaluation by combined pH impedance, close to half were found to have gastroesophageal reflux disease. The majority of gastroesophageal reflux occurred while the patients were in the upright position.

SummaryBackgroundCurrent management of refractory benign oesophageal strictures with endoscopic dilations and stenting leads to resolution of dysphagia in only 30% of patients. Oesophageal self‐dilation may be an alternative.AimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of oesophageal self‐dilation at a tertiary referral centre.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients with refractory benign oesophageal strictures who participated in oesophageal self‐dilation at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA) between 2003 and 2017. Clinical data including stricture characteristics, Dakkak and Bennett Dysphagia Score, number and dates of endoscopies, and complications were collected. A two‐tailed paired Student's t test was used to compare the measures of efficacy, with differences considered significant at a 5% probability level.ResultsWe identified 52 patients with refractory strictures treated with self‐dilation. The median number of endoscopic interventions was reduced from 9.5 (range 5‐30) to 0 (range 0‐3) within 12 months before and after self‐dilation, respectively (P < 0.0001). A median intervention‐free interval of 417 days (IQR 256‐756 days) was observed. The mean dysphagia score at baseline was 2.5 (95% CI 2.2‐2.8) and 0.33 (95% CI 0.11‐0.53) after self‐dilation. 23 of 27 (85%) patients who received enteral nutrition prior to self‐dilation had their feeding tubes removed.ConclusionsOesophageal self‐dilation is an effective way of maintaining oesophageal patency in refractory benign oesophageal strictures, with safety comparable to current standard of care. Prospective studies are needed to further validate the role of self‐dilation in treatment of refractory benign oesophageal strictures.