Kopp, Karla J

Abstract Objectives We aimed to assess the expression of biomarkers of response to antibody-drug conjugates (TROP2 and nectin-4) and immune microenvironment (NKG7, PD-L1, and B7-H3) in penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC). Methods Our archive was queried for patients who had a penectomy for pSCC between 2000 and 2022. Primary tumors were immunostained for B7-H3 and NKG7, while metastatic specimens were immunostained for TROP2 and nectin-4. Expression of PD-L1, TROP2, and nectin-4 in primary tumors was previously characterized. H-scores (0-300) were used to quantify expression. Associations between biomarkers, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and clinicopathologic and outcome parameters were evaluated. Results For both TROP2 and nectin-4, H-scores within the lymph node metastases were higher compared to those within the primary tumors (mean, 264.5 vs 244.8, P = .0003; mean, 170.6 vs 146.7, P = .05, respectively; 33 paired specimens). For B7-H3 (n = 107), 32.7% of the primary tumors had an H-score of more than 0. In 34.8% of the cases, NKG7 expression was observed in 25% to 50% of the TILs. A significant association was noted between TIL density, B7-H3, NKG7, and PD-L1 expression. Conclusions Therapeutic strategies targeting TROP2 and nectin-4 hold promise for patients with advanced pSCC. The potential of PD-L1, B7-H3, and NKG7 for predicting response to immunomodulatory treatment warrants further research.

BACKGROUNDThe amount of time available to pathologists with which to perform research is becoming limited due to an increasing manpower shortage in pathology, decreased reimbursement, and increased workload. This is occurring at the same time as demands escalate for pathologists to develop new companion tests, correlate the molecular findings with traditional methods, and assist in the development of individualized medicine. This study examined whether cytotechnologists may be integrated into a research team that uses their expertise in understanding pathology and clinical disease to provide interpretations of experiments that traditionally were performed by pathologists.METHODSCytotechnologists worked with pathologists to choose blocks for tissue microarrays (TMAs) and to interpret immunohistochemically stained TMA slides. The pathologist met with the cytotechnologist to review the study design. The cytotechnologists reviewed the slides and blocks and chose the most appropriate blocks for the TMA. Either 10% or all of the slides/blocks selected for TMA construction were reviewed by the supervising pathologist. The final selections were given to the TMA technologist to make the TMA. A minimum of 10% of the immunohistochemically stained TMA slides were reviewed by the supervising pathologist.RESULTSA total of 32 TMAs were created with 6 cytotechnologists collaborating with 6 pathologists. Immunohistochemical stains of 190 TMAs were interpreted by 4 cytotechnologists collaborating with 3 pathologists. All the TMAs and TMA interpretation data were used successfully for the research for which they were designed.CONCLUSIONSThe collaboration of cytotechnologists and pathologists in research can improve the quality of effort and increase satisfaction and productivity. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:232‐5. © 2018 American Cancer Society.