Jess, T

Objective Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasingly recognised in the Middle East, but limited regional data hinder a clear understanding of its burden. We aimed to examine trends in IBD diagnoses, disease phenotypes and predictors of poor outcomes at a major tertiary referral centre in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated diagnostic trends in a cohort of 600 Arab patients between 2002 and June 2025 and analysed detailed phenotypes in a subcohort of 414 patients diagnosed since 2012. Results We observed a nearly 13-fold increase in new IBD diagnoses among Arab patients at our centre between 2002 and 2024. This cohort (median age at diagnosis 25 years; 65% Crohn’s disease (CD; n=269), 35% ulcerative colitis (UC; n=145)) demonstrated a sharper rise in CD compared with UC, with CD being diagnosed at a significantly younger age (median 25 years vs 30 years, p=0.001). A substantial proportion of patients with CD presented with complicated disease defined as stricturing (B2; 22%, n=59), penetrating (B3; 17%, n=46) and perianal (34%, n=92) disease. Ileocolonic (L3) disease was a significant predictor for presenting with a complicated phenotype (OR 3.89). Penetrating (OR 13.9), stricturing (OR 3.38) and perianal (OR 2.22) disease were significant predictors for requiring surgery. 84% of patients with CD and 62% of patients with UC were exposed to advanced therapy. A diagnosis of CD and younger age at diagnosis were associated with a higher likelihood of needing advanced therapy. Conclusions This study provides the most comprehensive data set on IBD diagnoses and phenotypes in the UAE to date, highlighting a pronounced rise in IBD overall and of aggressive disease presentations in CD in particular.

SummaryBackgroundThere are conflicting data on comparative effectiveness of adalimumab and infliximab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).AimsTo compare the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab and infliximab in biologic‐naïve patients with CD, in a nationwide register‐based propensity score‐matched cohort study in Denmark.MethodsA total of 2908 Danish adults with CD had been treated with adalimumab or infliximab as their first biologic agent between 2005‐2014. By Cox regression, we compared rates of all‐cause hospitalisation, CD‐related hospitalisation, major abdominal surgery and serious infections after variable 2:1 propensity score matching, accounting for baseline disease characteristics, healthcare utilisation and use of CD‐related medications.ResultsAfter propensity‐score matching, we included 315 adalimumab‐ (34.9 ± 12.9 years, 41.9% males) and 512 infliximab‐treated (33.6 ± 12.6 years, 40.8% males) patients, with median disease duration 4.0 years; 36.9% had prior abdominal surgery. Over a median follow‐up 2.3 years after starting biological therapy, there were no significant differences in rate of CD‐related hospitalisation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.55‐1.20]) or major abdominal surgery (HR, 1.24 [0.66‐2.33]) between adalimumab‐ and infliximab‐treated patients, though rate of all‐cause hospitalisation was lower in adalimumab‐treated patients (HR, 0.74 [0.56‐0.97]). There was no significant difference in incidence of serious infections requiring hospitalisation (HR, 1.06 [0.26‐4.21]). These results were stable in patients treated with biological monotherapy (all‐cause hospitalisation: HR, 0.75 [0.53‐1.05]; CD‐related hospitalisation: HR, 0.82 [0.51‐1.32], abdominal surgery: HR, 1.47 [0.63‐3.47]) or in combination with immunomodulators (all‐cause hospitalisation: HR, 0.70 [0.44‐1.11]; CD‐related hospitalisation: HR, 0.80 [0.42‐1.52], abdominal surgery: HR, 1.02 [0.39‐2.64]).ConclusionsIn this population‐based, propensity score matched, real‐life cohort study using administrative claims, there was no significant difference in effectiveness and safety of adalimumab and infliximab in biologic‐naïve patients with CD.