Epps, Kevin L

Abstract Purpose Surgical patients with a penicillin allergy label (PAL) are less likely to receive β-lactams for surgical site infection (SSI) prophylaxis and more likely to receive second-line antibiotics, which may increase the risk of SSI, drug toxicities, and associated costs. We assessed the impact of implementing a pharmacist-led quality improvement project to increase the use of cefazolin as a first-line agent in this population. Summary After implementation of a pilot project in December 2021, all patients with a PAL and orders for preoperative antibiotics were risk stratified into high- or low-risk categories by a pharmacist. For the low-risk group, cefazolin was recommended. For the high-risk group, cefazolin was avoided and a second-line agent was administered. Our analysis compared 422 preintervention patients (August 15 to November 15, 2021) to 492 postintervention patients (December 15 to March 15, 2022). During the postintervention period, β-lactam usage increased (from 12.6% to 37.8%, P < 0.001), while usage of vancomycin (45.5% vs 29.5%, P < 0.001) and other second-line antibiotics (87.4% vs 62.2%, P < 0.001) declined. There were no adverse reactions reported in the preintervention cohort, with 2 potential adverse reactions reported after the intervention (0% vs 0.4%, P = 0.190). Medication costs based on claims data were 50% to 80% lower for patients receiving cefazolin. Conclusion In our cohort, a pharmacy-led antibiotic selection algorithm for patients with a PAL receiving perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis resulted in increased use of β-lactam antibiotics, decreased use of second-line antibiotics, and decreased costs without a significant change in the incidence of adverse reactions.

AbstractAcute pulmonary exacerbations are complications of cystic fibrosis (CF) and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Aspergillus fumigatus are organisms that have been detected in the lungs of CF patients. The focus of this review is to provide an overview of the classes of antimicrobials used for MRSA and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), a hypersensitivity reaction caused by A. fumigatus. The current anti‐MRSA antibiotics and medications for ABPA dosing recommendations are discussed. This article also reviews the findings from the MRSA utilization surveys and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between CF and non‐CF patients. Antimethicillin S. aureus antibiotics include ceftaroline, clindamycin, fluoroquinolone derivatives (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin), glycopeptide derivatives (telavancin, vancomycin), linezolid, rifampin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and tetracycline derivatives (doxycycline, minocycline, tigecycline). Medications used for ABPA include corticosteroids, amphotericin B, azole antifungals (isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole), and a monoclonal antibody, omalizumab.

AbstractThis review is the second article in the State‐of‐the‐Art series and aims to evaluate medications used in the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in pediatric and adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). ABPA is one of several organisms that are found in the airways of CF patients. This review provides an evidence‐based summary of pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD), tolerability, and efficacy studies of medications including corticosteroids, amphotericin B, azole antifungals (isavuconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole), and a monoclonal antibody omalizumab in the treatment of ABPA and identifies areas where further study is warranted.

AbstractAcute pulmonary exacerbations (APE) are a complication of cystic fibrosis (CF) and are associated with morbidity and mortality. Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of many organisms that has been detected in the airways of patients with CF. This review provides an evidence‐based summary of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD), tolerability, and efficacy studies utilizing anti‐MRSA antibiotics (ie, ceftaroline, clindamycin, fluoroquinolone derivatives (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin), glycopeptide derivatives (telavancin, vancomycin), linezolid, rifampin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMZ/TMP), and tetracycline derivatives (doxycycline, minocycline, tigecycline) in the treatment of APE and identifies areas where further study is warranted. A recent utilization study of antimicrobials for anti‐MRSA has shown some CF Foundation accredited care centers and affiliate programs are using doses higher than the FDA‐approved doses. Further studies are needed to determine the PK/PD properties in CF patients with clindamycin, minocycline, rifampin, SMZ/TMP, telavancin, and tigecycline; as well as, efficacy and tolerability studies with ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, doxycycline, levofloxacin, minocycline, rifampin, SMZ/TMP, in CF patients with MRSA.