Dinenno, Frank A

New Findings What is the central question of this study? What is the effect of an elevated baseline blood flow, induced by high‐dose intra‐arterial infusion of either adenosine or ATP, on the rapid‐onset vasodilatory response to a single forearm muscle contraction? What is the main finding and its importance? The peak response to a single contraction is unaffected by augmented baseline blood flow, and thus, is likely to be attributable to a feedforward vasodilatory mechanism. AbstractThe hyperaemic responses to single muscle contractions are proportional to exercise intensity, which, in turn, is proportional to tissue metabolic demand. Hence, we tested the hypothesis that the rapid‐onset vasodilatory response after a single muscle contraction would be unaffected when baseline blood flow was increased via high‐dose intra‐arterial infusion of either adenosine (ADO) or ATP. Twenty‐four healthy young participants (28 ± 1 years) performed a single forearm contraction (20% maximal voluntary contraction) 75 min after commencement of a continuous infusion of ADO (n = 6), ATP (n = 8) or saline (control; n = 10). Brachial artery diameter and blood velocity were measured using Doppler ultrasound. Resting forearm vascular conductance (FVC; in millilitres per minute per 100 mmHg per decilitre of forearm volume) was significantly higher during ADO (33 ± 17) and ATP infusion (33 ± 17) compared with the control infusion (8 ± 3; P < 0.05). The peak FVCs post‐contraction during ADO and ATP infusions were significantly greater than during the control infusion (P < 0.05), but not different from one another. The peak change in FVC from baseline was similar in all three conditions (control, 14 ± 1; ADO, 24 ± 2; and ATP, 23 ± 6; P = 0.15). Total FVC (area under the curve) did not differ significantly between ADO and ATP (333 ± 69 and 440 ± 125); however, total FVC during ATP infusion was significantly greater compared with the control value (150 ± 19; P < 0.05). We conclude that the peak response to a single contraction is unaffected by augmented baseline blood flow and is therefore likely to be attributable to a feedforward vasodilatory mechanism.

Key points Intravascular ATP attenuates sympathetic vasoconstriction (sympatholysis) similar to what is observed in contracting skeletal muscle of humans, and may be an important contributor to exercise hyperaemia. Similar to exercise, ATP‐mediated vasodilatation occurs via activation of inwardly rectifying potassium channels (K IR ), and synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins (PG). However, recent evidence suggests that these dilatatory pathways are not obligatory for sympatholysis during exercise; therefore, we tested the hypothesis that the ability of ATP to blunt α 1 ‐adrenergic vasoconstriction in resting skeletal muscle would be independent of K IR , NO, PGs and Na + /K + ‐ATPase activity. Blockade of K IR channels alone or in combination with NO, PGs and Na + /K + ‐ATPase significantly reduced the vasodilatatory response to ATP, although intravascular ATP maintained the ability to attenuate α 1 ‐adrenergic vasoconstriction. This study highlights similarities in the vascular response to ATP and exercise, and further supports a potential role of intravascular ATP in blood flow regulation during exercise in humans. Abstract Exercise and intravascular ATP elicit vasodilatation that is dependent on activation of inwardly rectifying potassium (K IR ) channels, with a modest reliance on nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin (PG) synthesis. Both exercise and intravascular ATP attenuate sympathetic α‐adrenergic vasoconstriction (sympatholysis). However, K IR channels, NO, PGs and Na + /K + ‐ATPase activity are not obligatory to observe sympatholysis during exercise. To further determine similarities between exercise and intravascular ATP, we tested the hypothesis that inhibition of K IR channels, NO and PG synthesis, and Na + /K + ‐ATPase would not alter the ability of ATP to blunt α 1 ‐adrenergic vasoconstriction. In healthy subjects, we measured forearm blood flow (Doppler ultrasound) and calculated changes in vascular conductance (FVC) to intra‐arterial infusion of phenylephrine (PE; α 1 ‐agonist) during ATP or control vasodilatator infusion, before and after K IR channel inhibition alone (barium chloride; n = 7; Protocol 1); NO ( l ‐NMMA) and PG (ketorolac) inhibition alone, or combined NO, PGs, Na + /K + ‐ATPase (ouabain) and K IR channel inhibition ( n = 6; Protocol 2). ATP attenuated PE‐mediated vasoconstriction relative to adenosine (ADO) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (PE‐mediated ΔFVC: ATP: −16 ± 2; ADO: −38 ± 6; SNP: −59 ± 6%; P < 0.05 vs . ADO and SNP). Blockade of K IR channels alone or combined with NO, PGs and Na + /K + ‐ATPase, attenuated ATP‐mediated vasodilatation (∼35 and ∼60% respectively; P < 0.05 vs . control). However, ATP maintained the ability to blunt PE‐mediated vasoconstriction (PE‐mediated ΔFVC: K IR blockade alone: −6 ± 5%; combined blockade:−4 ± 14%; P > 0.05 vs . control). These findings demonstrate that intravascular ATP modulates α 1 ‐adrenergic vasoconstriction via pathways independent of K IR channels, NO, PGs and Na + /K + ‐ATPase in humans, consistent with a role for endothelium‐derived hyperpolarization in functional sympatholysis.