Kurup, Anil Nicholas

AbstractPurposeAn increasing number of implantable or external devices can impact whether patients can receive radiological imaging examinations. This study examines and tests the Neulasta (pegfilgrastim) Onpro on‐body injector in multiple imaging environments.MethodsThe injector was analyzed for four imaging modalities with testing protocols and strategies developed for each modality. In x‐ray and computed tomography (CT), scans with much higher exposure than clinical protocols were performed with the device attached to an anthropomorphic phantom. The device was monitored until the completion of drug delivery. For magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the device was assessed using a hand‐held magnet and underwent the magnetically induced displacement testing in a 1.5T clinical MRI scanner room. For ultrasound, magnetic field changes were measured around an ultrasound scanner system with three transducers.ResultsFor x‐ray and CT no sign of device error was identified during or after the high radiation exposure scans. Drug delivery was completed at expected timing with expected volume. For MRI the device showed significant attractive force towards the hand‐held magnet and a 50‐degree deflection angle at 50 cm from the opening of the scanner bore. No further assessment from the gradient or radiofrequency field was deemed necessary. For ultrasound the maximum magnetic field change from baseline was measured to be +11.7 μT in comparison to +74.2 μT at 4 inches from a working microwave.ConclusionsNo device performance issue was identified under the extreme test conditions in x‐ray or CT. The device was found to be MR Unsafe. Magnetic field changes around an ultrasound system met the limitation set by manufacture. Patient ultrasound scanning is considered safe as long as the transducers do not inadvertently loosen the device.

Objective To evaluate the association between renal tumour complexity and outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous cryoablation ( PCA ). Patients and Methods Patients with renal tumours treated with PCA were identified using our prospectively maintained ablation registry (2003–2015). Salvage procedures and inherited tumour syndromes were excluded. The associations between R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score ( NS ) and risk of complications, renal function impairment, local failure and cancer‐specific mortality ( CSM ) were evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic, linear and Cox regression models. Results The cohort included 618 tumours treated during 580 procedures in 565 patients. The median (interquartile range [ IQR ]) follow‐up was 34 (14.66) months. Complications (any grade) during a procedure ( n [total] = 87, 15%) were more frequent with higher NS ( NS 4–6: 10%; NS 7–9: 14%; NS 10–12: 36%; P < 0.001). Higher NS was independently associated with risk of complications (odds ratio [ OR ; per 1 point] = 1.3; 95% confidence interval [ CI ] 1.2–1.5; P < 0.001). Of all the NS components, tumour size was the most strongly associated with complication risk ( OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.2–5.2; P < 0.001). The median ( IQR ) decline in glomerular filtration rate ( GFR ) from baseline was 9% (0, 22) at last follow‐up. Each additional point in NS was associated with a 1.3% (95% CI 0.4–2.1; P = 0.005) greater GFR decline from baseline. NS was not significantly associated with local failure ( n [total] = 14, 2%; NS 4–6: 2%; NS 7–9: 3%; NS 10–12: 5%; P = 0.32) or CSM ( n [total] = 8, 2%; NS 4–6: 2%; NS 7–9: 3%; NS 10–12: 2%; P = 0.88). Conclusion In high‐complexity tumours PCA was associated with a tumour size‐driven increased risk of post‐procedural complications. Higher NS was associated with a small, clinically minor additional decline in renal function. Risks for local failure and CSM were low, regardless of tumour complexity.