Back to Authors

Rohlik, Gina M

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic.

Citations 3

Structured Nurse-Led PICU Liberation Bundle (ABCDEF) Discussion During Rounds: A Single-Center, Secondary Analysis of Pre- Vs. Post-Implementation Data From 2017
Fashina, Oluwatomini A. , Kahoud, Robert J., Rohlik, Gina, Mujic, Anna J., Vu, Joshua K., Matzke, Nanette, Aganga, Devon O. , Gleich, Stephen J. , Schears, Gregory J. , Dorn, Charlotte S. Van, Crow, Sheri, Schiltz, Brenda , Ouellette, Yves , Arteaga, Grace M., Kawai, Yu , Rohlik, Gina M, Vu, Joshua, Nemergut, Michael E. , Matzke, Nanette E, Van Dorn, Charlotte S, Schiltz, Brenda M, Kawai, Yu , Fashina, Oluwatomini, Mujic, Anna J., Dorn, Charlotte S. Van , Arteaga, Grace M.

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine | January 8, 2026 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 72-81

10.1097/pcc.0000000000003869 Get It

Objective: The Society of Critical Care Medicine PICU Liberation ABCDEF (A–F) Campaign Collaborative aimed to implement best practices for analgesia (A), breathing (B), comfort/consciousness (C), delirium (D), early mobilization (E), and family engagement and empowerment (F). Our post hoc study of Mayo Clinic data sought to compare the pre-implementation rounding process, which used a nursing script organized by organ systems, with a novel, liberation-focused rounding process emphasizing A–F bundle elements. Design: Secondary analysis of pre- vs. post-implementation surveys collected by independent observers during rounds. Setting: Medical/surgical PICU in a quaternary-care, academic medical center during April to July 2017. Subjects: The observed participants included PICU physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, and dietitians. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Survey responses from 145 team members pre-implementation and 67 post-implementation showed improved team satisfaction, communication, and understanding of daily plans (all p < 0.05). Respondents reported an increased frequency of discussions on bundle components A–E (all p < 0.01). Observations of 41 pre-implementation and 46 post-implementation rounds showed an increase in the frequency of discussion of all components of the bundle (all p < 0.01). However, this finding was not at the expense of increased duration of individual rounds since we failed to find a difference in pre- vs. post-implementation duration per patient (480 vs. 544 s per patient, p = 0.20). Conclusions: In 2017, around the time of introducing the nurse-led PICU Liberation rounding process to our practice, we found that after implementation, there was an associated increase in discussions about bundle elements and improved communications and satisfaction in team members.
Overcoming Barriers to Delirium Screening in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
Rohlik, Gina, Fryer, Karen, Duncan, Julie , Coon, Heather M., Padhya, Dipti , Kahoud, Robert J., Rohlik, Gina M, Fryer, Karen R, Tripathi, Sandeep, Duncan, Julie M, Coon, Heather L, Padhya, Dipti R, Tripathi, Sandeep , Coon, Heather L.

Critical Care Nurse | August 1, 2018 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 57-67

10.4037/ccn2018227 Get It

BACKGROUNDDelirium is associated with poor outcomes in adults but is less extensively studied in children.OBJECTIVESTo describe a quality improvement initiative to implement delirium assessment in a pediatric intensive care unit and to identify barriers to delirium screening completion.METHODSA survey identified perceived barriers to delirium assessment. Failure modes and effects analysis characterized factors likely to impede assessment. A randomized case-control study evaluated factors affecting assessment by comparing patients always assessed with patients never assessed.RESULTSDelirium assessment was completed in 57% of opportunities over 1 year, with 2% positive screen results. Education improved screening completion by 20%. Barriers to assessment identified by survey (n = 25) included remembering to complete assessments, documentation outside workflow, and “busy patient.” Factors with high risk prediction numbers were lack of time and paper charting. Patients always assessed had more severe illness (median Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score, 0.90 vs 0.36; P &lt; .001), more developmental disabilities (moderate to severe pediatric cerebral performance category score, 54% vs 32%; P = .007), and admission during lower pediatric intensive care unit census (median [interquartile range], 10 [9–12] vs 12 [10–13]; P &lt; .001) than did those never assessed (each group, n = 80). Patients receiving mechanical ventilation were less likely to be assessed (41.0% vs 51.2%, P &lt; .001).CONCLUSIONSSuccessful implementation of pediatric delirium screening may be associated with early use of quality improvement tools to identify assessment barriers, comprehensive education, monitoring system with feedback, multidisciplinary team involvement, and incorporation into nursing workflow models.
Introducing Essential Oils into Pediatric and Other Practices at an Academic Medical Center
Conlon, Patricia M. , Haack, Kristen M., Rodgers, Nancy J., Dion, Liza J., Cambern, Kari L., Rohlik, Gina, Nelson, Dawn E., Barry, Tracy A., Ayres, Sara , Cutshall, Susanne M. , Rohlik, Gina M, Ayres, Sara J

Journal of Holistic Nursing | November 11, 2016 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 389-396

10.1177/0898010116677400 Get It

Aromatherapy is an integrative intervention that uses essential oils to address symptom management, potentially as a first-line intervention or as a complement to other medical treatments. Aromatherapy is gaining widespread acceptance and increased scientific evidence of efficacy. Integrative and holistic nursing care uses integrative therapies such as aromatherapy and the principle of moving from a less invasive intervention to a more invasive intervention according to patient needs, symptoms, and preferences. Aromatherapy is often provided as a minimally invasive, independent, and integrative nursing intervention. This article describes the process used to introduce essential oils into practices at a large Midwestern academic medical center.