Back to Authors

Oldenburg, Michael S

Mayo Clinic

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A.

Citations 2

The Utility of Sentinel Node Biopsy for Sinonasal Melanoma
Oldenburg, Michael , Oldenburg, Michael S, Price, Daniel L.

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 05 | Pages: 425-429

10.1055/s-0037-1603960 Get It

Objective Report two positive sentinel node biopsies for sinonasal melanoma. Design Retrospective review. Setting Academic tertiary care center. Participants Patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy for sinonasal melanoma between November 1, 2014 and November 1, 2015. Main Outcome Measures Clinical course. Results Two patients were identified. Patient 1 (83M) presented with a sinonasal melanoma anterior to the left inferior turbinate and was clinically N0 neck. Lymphoscintigraphy revealed two sentinel nodes in the ipsilateral and three in the contralateral cervical basins. The left level I sentinel node was positive for melanoma and lymphadenectomy showed no additional metastases.Patient 2 (71F) presented after incomplete resection of a sinonasal melanoma of the left posterior maxillary sinus wall and was clinically N0 neck. Lymphoscintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) localization revealed one sentinel node in the parapharyngeal space and another in the ipsilateral cervical basin. Metastatic melanoma was found in both nodes and completion lymphadenectomy was negative for additional disease.Both patients developed distant metastasis in less than 1 year after surgical resection but responded well to adjuvant immunomodulatory chemotherapeutic agents. Conclusion Sentinel node biopsy for sinonasal melanoma can provide crucial clinical evidence of regional metastasis prior to overt clinical signs and symptoms. This intraoperative tool has the potential to improve detection of regional metastasis and improve long-term outcomes of this aggressive malignancy.
Histologic Evaluation of Micronized AlloDerm After Injection Laryngoplasty in a Rabbit Model
Oldenburg, Michael , Janus, Jeff, Voss, Steve, Marina, Serban San, Chen, Tiffany , García, Joaquín J. , Ekbom, Dale C. , Oldenburg, Michael S, San Marina, Serban, Garcia, Joaquin, Ekbom, Dale

The Laryngoscope | August 31, 2016 | Volume: 127 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/lary.26262 Get It

Objectives/HypothesisMicronized AlloDerm is a commonly used injectable material for injection laryngoplasty; however, the histologic response to laryngeal implantation and resorption rate over time have not been elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the in vivo response of micronized AlloDerm over time after laryngeal implantation using a rabbit model.Study DesignAnimal model.MethodsThe left recurrent laryngeal nerve was sectioned in five New Zealand White rabbits to create a vocal cord paralysis. Two weeks later, injection laryngoplasty was performed with 100 μL of micronized AlloDerm. Animals were sacrificed 4 (two rabbits) and 12 (three rabbits) weeks after injection. Histologic sections were stained and evaluated by a single pathologist. Volume estimates were made by assuming the implant took an ellipsoid shape using dimensions calculated from histologic slides.ResultsIn all cases, histological analysis revealed a lymphocytic inflammatory response infiltrating the peripheral margins of injection. After 4 weeks, the volume of injected material remaining in two rabbits was 404 and 278 mm3 (average 341 mm3). After 12 weeks, the volume of injected material remaining in three rabbits was 0, 61, and 124 mm3 (average 62 mm3), an 82% difference in volume of material between animals sacrificed at 4 weeks versus 12 weeks.ConclusionsInjection laryngoplasty using micronized AlloDerm induces a lymphocytic inflammatory response after injection in a rabbit model. Though a significant amount of material remains after 4 weeks, by 12 weeks the majority has been reabsorbed.Level of EvidenceNA Laryngoscope, 127:E166–E169, 2017