Back to Authors

Dimopoulos, Meletios A

Mayo Clinic

Meletios A. Dimopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, and Evangelos Terpos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Nelson Leung and S. Vincent Rajku

Citations 2

Health-Related Quality-of-Life Results From the Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III ASPIRE Trial Evaluating Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
Stewart, A. Keith, Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Masszi, Tamás , Špıčka, Ivan , Oriol, Albert , Hájek, Roman , Rosiñol, Laura , Niesvizky, Rubén, Miguel, Jesús F. San , Buchanan, Jacqui, Cocks, Kim , Yang, Xinqun, Xing, Biao, Zojwalla, Naseem J., Tonda, Margaret, Moreau, Philippe , Palumbo, Antonio , Dimopoulos, Meletios A, Siegel, David S. , San-Miguel, Jesus F, Ludwig, Heinz , Zojwalla, Naseem, Jakubowiak, Andrzej , Hajek, Roman , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , Moreau, Philippe , San-Miguel, Jesus , Masszi, Tamas , Oriol, Albert

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 7, 2016 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 32 | Pages: 3921-3930

10.1200/jco.2016.66.9648 Get It

Purpose To determine the effects of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in the Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (ASPIRE) trial. Methods Patients with relapsed multiple myeloma were randomly assigned to receive KRd or Rd. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and myeloma-specific module were administered at baseline; day 1 of cycles 3, 6, 12, and 18; and after treatment. The Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale and seven subscales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, physical functioning, role functioning, disease symptoms, and adverse effects of treatment) were compared between groups using a mixed model for repeated measures. The percentages of responders with ≥ 5- or 15-point GHS/QoL improvement at each cycle were compared between groups. Results Baseline questionnaire compliance was excellent (94.1% of randomly assigned patients). KRd patients had higher GHS/QoL scores versus Rd patients over 18 treatment cycles (two-sided P < .001). The minimal important difference was met at cycle 12 (5.6 points) and approached at cycle 18 (4.8 points). There was no difference between groups for the other prespecified subscales from ASPIRE. A higher proportion of KRd patients met the GHS/QoL responder definition (≥ 5-point improvement) with statistical differences at cycle 12 (KRd v Rd patients, 25.5% v 17.4%, respectively) and 18 (KRd v Rd patients, 24.2% v 12.9%, respectively). Conclusion KRd improves GHS/QoL without negatively affecting patient-reported symptoms when compared with Rd. These data further support the benefit of KRd in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.
International Myeloma Working Group Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Myeloma-Related Renal Impairment
Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Sonneveld, Pieter , Merlini, Giampaolo , Kastritis, Efstathios , Goldschmidt, Hartmut , Joshua, Douglas, Orlowski, Robert Z. , Powles, Raymond, Vesole, David H., Garderet, Laurent, Palumbo, Antonio , Cavo, Michèle , Richardson, Paul G. , Moreau, Philippe , Miguel, Jesús F. San , Durie, Brian G.M. , Terpos, Evangelos , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Russell, Stephen J. , Rosiñol, Laura , Ocio, Enrique M. , García‐Sánz, Ramón , Beksaç, Meral , Zweegman, Sonja , Usmani, Saad Z. , Donk, Niels W.C.J. van de , Pratt, Guy , Chari, Ajai , Cook, Gordon , Rossi, Adriana , O’Dwyer, Michael , Paiva, Bruno , Larrea, Carlos Fernández de , Souza, Cármino Antônio De , Terragna, Carolina , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Dimopoulos, Meletios A, Ludwig, Heinz , San Miguel, Jesús, Leung, Nelson , Joshua, Douglas, Orlowski, Robert Z. , Einsele, Hermann , Richardson, Paul Gerard Guy , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Zweegman, Sonja , Merlini, Giampaolo , Dimopoulos, Meletios A , Russell, Stephen J , Moreau, Philippe , Terpos, Evangelos , Chari, Ajai , San-Miguel, Jesus , Paiva, Bruno , Kastritis, Efstathios , Garcia-Sanz, Ramon , Beksac, Meral , Cook, Gordon , Usmani, Saad , Rossi, Adriana , Ocio, Enrique M

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 14, 2016 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1544-1557

10.1200/jco.2015.65.0044 Get It

Purpose The aim of the International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practical recommendations for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma–related renal impairment (RI). Methods Recommendations were based on published data through December 2015, and were developed using the system developed by the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group. Recommendations All patients with myeloma at diagnosis and at disease assessment should have serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and electrolytes measurements as well as free light chain, if available, and urine electrophoresis of a sample from a 24-hour urine collection (grade A). The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, preferably, or the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula should be used for the evaluation of estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with stabilized serum creatinine (grade A). International Myeloma Working Group criteria for renal reversibility should be used (grade B). For the management of RI in patients with multiple myeloma, high fluid intake is indicated along with antimyeloma therapy (grade B). The use of high-cutoff hemodialysis membranes in combination with antimyeloma therapy can be considered (grade B). Bortezomib-based regimens remain the cornerstone of the management of myeloma-related RI (grade A). High-dose dexamethasone should be administered at least for the first month of therapy (grade B). Thalidomide is effective in patients with myeloma with RI, and no dose modifications are needed (grade B). Lenalidomide is effective and safe, mainly in patients with mild to moderate RI (grade B); for patients with severe RI or on dialysis, lenalidomide should be given with close monitoring for hematologic toxicity (grade B) with dose reduction as needed. High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (with melphalan 100 mg/m 2 to 140 mg/m 2 ) is feasible in patients with RI (grade C). Carfilzomib can be safely administered to patients with creatinine clearance > 15 mL/min, whereas ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone can be safely administered to patients with creatinine clearance > 30 mL/min (grade A).