Hassan, Anhar

ABSTRACTBackgroundTreating functional movement disorder (FMD) with motor retraining is effective but resource intensive.ObjectivesIdentify patient, disease, and program variables associated with favorable treatment outcomes.MethodsRetrospective review of the 1 week intensive outpatient FMD program at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota from February 2019 to August 2021. Outcomes included patient‐reported measures (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure‐Performance and Satisfaction subscales [COPM‐P and COPM‐S, range 0–10] and Global Rating of Change [GROC, −7 to +7]) and a retrospective investigator‐rated scale (0–3, worse/not improved to significantly improved/resolved). Linear regression models identified variables predicting favorable outcomes.ResultsParticipants (n = 201, 74% female, mean age = 46) had median FMD duration of 24 months. The commonest FMD subtypes were gait disorder (65%), tremor (41%) and weakness (17%); 53% had ≥2 subtypes. Most patients (88%) completed a therapeutic screening process before program entry. Patient‐reported outcomes at the end of the week improved substantially (COPM‐P average change 3.8 ± 1.9; GROC post‐program average 5.5 ± 1.7). Available investigator‐rated outcomes from short‐term follow‐up were also positive (102/122 [84%] moderately to significantly improved/resolved). Factors predicting greater improvement in COPM‐P were completing therapeutic screening, higher number of non‐motor symptoms, shorter FMD duration, earlier program entry, lower baseline COPM scores, and (among screened patients) higher GROC between therapeutic screening and program start.ConclusionPatients with diverse FMD subtypes improved substantially over a 1 week period. Utilization of therapeutic screening and greater improvement between therapeutic screening and program start were novel predictors of favorable outcomes. Non‐motor symptoms did not preclude positive responses, although patients with predominant non‐motor burden were excluded.

Abstract Background Deep brain stimulator (DBS)–related infection is a recognized complication that may significantly alter the course of DBS therapy. We describe the Mayo Clinic Rochester experience with DBS-related infections. Methods This was a retrospective study of all adults (≥18 years old) who underwent DBS-related procedures between 2000 and 2020 at the Mayo Clinic Rochester. Results There were 1087 patients who underwent 1896 procedures. Infection occurred in 57/1112 (5%) primary DBS implantations and 16/784 (2%) revision surgeries. The median time to infection (interquartile range) was 2.1 (0.9–6.9) months. The odds of infection were higher with longer operative length (P = .002), higher body mass index (BMI; P = .006), male sex (P = .041), and diabetes mellitus (P = .002). The association between infection and higher BMI (P = .002), male sex (P = .016), and diabetes mellitus (P = .003) remained significant in a subgroup analysis of primary implantations but not revision surgeries. Infection was superficial in 17 (23%) and deep in 56 (77%) cases. Commonly identified pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (65%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (43%), and Cutibacterium acnes (45%). Three device management approaches were identified: 39 (53%) had complete device explantation, 20 (27%) had surgical intervention with device retention, and 14 (19%) had medical management alone. Treatment failure occurred in 16 (23%) patients. Time-to-event analysis showed fewer treatment failures with complete device explantation (P = .015). Only 1 individual had complications with brain abscess at failure. Conclusions Primary DBS implantations had higher rates of infection compared with revision surgeries. Complete device explantation was favored for deep infections. However, device salvage was commonly attempted and is a reasonable approach in select cases given the low rate of complications.

The course of patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) who undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) is unclear. In a retrospective review of 1,496 patients with MSA evaluated at our institutions from 1998–2021, 12 patients underwent DBS; 9 had a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease at the time of surgery. Nine patients reported initial improvement in at least one symptom and 7 experienced overall worsening following DBS. All patients had at least one red flag sign or symptom suggesting atypical parkinsonism prior to surgery. Considering overall poor outcomes of DBS in MSA, we recommend careful consideration of red flags in patient selection.