Back to Authors

Angstman, Kurt

Mayo Clinic

Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Citations 4

Student experiences and satisfaction with a novel clerkship patient scheduling
Oberhelman, Sara S. , Boswell, Chris, Jensen, Teresa B. , Swartz, Daniel J. , Bruhl, Elliot J., O'Brien, M., Angstman, Kurt B. , Oberhelman, Sara , Jensen, Teresa , Swartz, Daniel , O'Brien, Marcia, Angstman, Kurt

Medical Education Online | March 15, 2020 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1080/10872981.2020.1742963 Get It

Impact of gestational diabetes diagnosis on concurrent depression in pregnancy
Miller, Nathaniel E. , Curry, Elizabeth , Laabs, Susan, Manhas, Manisha, Angstman, Kurt B. , Laabs, Susan B, Angstman, Kurt, Miller, Nathaniel E

Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology | January 7, 2020 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 190-193

10.1080/0167482x.2019.1709816 Get It

Impact of predictors upon the reduction of lipid parameters in family medicine practice
Doğaner, Yusuf Çetin , Angstman, Kurt B. , Rohrer, James E. , Merry, Stephen , Angstman, Kurt, Rohrer, James, Merry, Stephen P

Sao Paulo Medical Journal | December 2, 2015 | Volume: 133 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 428-434

10.1590/1516-3180.2014.00321501 Get It

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of changes in lipid parameters consisting of LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol), TC (total cholesterol) and non-HDL-C (non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol) among primary care patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective study conducted on family medicine patients. METHODS: Demographic features and other clinically relevant information were abstracted from medical records. The primary outcome was the difference in LDL-C level from initial testing to the index test. Secondary outcomes were the changes in TC and non-HDL-C levels between two measurements. RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven participants were included in the final secondary analysis. Multiple linear regression revealed that male patients (β = 4.97, P = 0.040), diabetes (β = 9.75, P = 0.003) and higher LDL-C levels at baseline (β = 0.35, P < 0.001) were positively associated with LDL variance, whereas longer time period (β = -0.15, P = 0.045) and familial hypercholesterolemia history (β = -7.56, P = 0.033) were negatively associated. Male patients (β = 8.45, P = 0.002), DM (β = 9.26, P = 0.011), higher TC levels at baseline (β = 0.35, P < 0.001) and taking statins (β = 7.31, P = 0.023) were positively associated with TC variance, whilst longer time period (β = -0.183, P = 0.031) and familial hypercholesterolemia (β = -10.70, P = 0.008) were negatively associated. CONCLUSION: In the present study, patients who were male, on statin treatment, diagnosed with diabetes and had higher baseline lipid values were more likely associated with better lipid outcomes at future testing.
Diabetes and depression: does worsening control of diabetes lead to poorer depression outcomes?
Angstman, Kurt B. , Flinchbaugh, Robert T., Flinchbaugh, Katherine, Meunier, Matthew R. , Angstman, Gregory L., Angstman, Kurt

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice | August 25, 2015 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 98-100

10.1111/jep.12443 Get It

AbstractRationale, aims and objectivesThe relationship between diabetes and depression is complex. The aim of this study was to study the impact of diabetic control in depressed primary care patients with diabetes on clinical remission of their depression at 6 months.MethodsThis study was a retrospective chart review analysis of 145 adult patients diagnosed with either major depressive disorder or dysthymia and had a score of 10 or greater on the PHQ‐9. The dependent variable for this study was depression remission at 6 months. The independent variables for this study were age, gender, marital status, race, BMI and HbA1c level within 2 months prior to the time of depression diagnosis.ResultsMultiple logistic regression modelling demonstrated that initial diabetic control or obesity were not independent predictors of depression remission at 6 months after index date. Also, the odds for the diabetes being in control (HbA1c <8.0%) after 6 months was only associated with being in control at baseline (OR 5.549, CI 2.364–13.024, P < 0.001).ConclusionsBaseline diabetic control does not appear to be an independent predictor for depression outcomes at 6 months. The best predictor of diabetic control after the diagnosis of depression was previous control of diabetes.