Phillips, L Taylor

463 Background: The genomic assessment of cancer has been revolutionized by next-generation sequencing and is increasingly being applied in the clinic to guide therapeutic decision-making. Time to reporting of results, specimen quantity, and analyte quality have constrained initial clinical applications to gene panels and whole exome based strategies. Methods: Patients underwent surgical resection, excisional or core biopsies, or bone marrow biopsy. Samples were analyzed by whole genome or exome sequencing and RNA sequencing, bioinformatics analysis, and therapeutic target prioritization by a multi-disciplinary Clinical Genomics Board. All prioritized targets were CLIA validated using Sanger sequencing, RT-qPCR, FISH, or IHC as appropriate. Treatment was delivered using off-label FDA approved drugs, clinical trials, or single patient INDs. Results: We have enrolled 40 patients with advanced, treatment-refractory cancers of whom sequencing data is available on 33. The initial 6 patients were evaluated in a non-CLIA pilot phase and 27 in the CLIA enabled phase. Upon availability of the initial report, identified targets of putative therapeutic relevance were then prioritized by the CGB in 22/27 patients (81%) for subsequent CLIA validation. Eleven patients have been treated with genomically selected therapy with partial response in 3/10 assessed patients. A testicular cancer patient had aberrations in two testes specific genes, a copy number gain in TSSK6 and a novel gene fusion between thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 3 (THRAP3) and Tektin 2 (TEKT2). Additionally, a case of papillary renal cell carcinoma had an amplification of YAP1 and a previously unreported P287T mutation in CCND1, suggesting potential benefit with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Treatment is ongoing and results will be reported. Conclusions: Integrated whole genome analysis in a CLIA setting is feasible. Integration of SNV, copy number and transcriptional data may allow for selection of putative driver genes to enhance targeted therapy decisions. Barriers for future broader implementation include the need for reduced time from biopsy to report and availability of therapies.

Abstract Purpose: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is among the most lethal forms of all malignancies. While significant research has implicated multiple genes in disease pathogenesis, identification of therapeutic leads has been difficult. The majority of currently available therapies provide only marginal benefit. To address this issue, our goal was to assess global somatic events across multiple pancreatic tumors by using next-generation sequencing technologies (NGS). Experimental Design: We performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) on paired tumor and normal samples from 3 pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Additionally, we performed whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) on 2 of these patients’ tumors for which tumor RNA was available. Results: We generated on average 132 billion mappable bases across all patients using WGS, and identified 140 somatic coding events including point mutations, insertion/deletions, and chromosomal copy number variants. Data from WGS and WTS were integrated and analyzed to identify the most heavily affected pancreatic cancer pathways across all patients. The KRAS signaling pathway was identified as the most significant map. Unbiased global pathway analysis was also performed to identify processes that may be impacted. Consistent with the previous analysis, the most significant pathway from this analysis is also KRAS signaling. This integrated analysis specifically identifies heavily affected pathways in pancreatic cancer and pinpoints genes and processes that may be considered as targets for more effective therapies. Conclusions: While sequencing of additional patients is necessary to strengthen selection of key pathways, we demonstrate the utility of using NGS to understand the processes driving pancreatic adenocarcinoma so that standardized treatments for patients may be improved. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5104. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-5104