Li, Zhuo

AbstractPurposeInduction immunosuppression has improved the long‐term outcomes after lung transplant. This is the first report exploring the association of induction immunosuppression with the development of de novo donor‐specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) in lung transplant recipients (LTR).MethodsSixty‐seven consecutive primary LTR were followed for 3 years posttransplant. A total of 41/67 (61%) LTR‐received induction immunosuppression using a single dose of rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (rATG; 1.5 mg/kg) within 24 h of transplant. All recipients had a negative flow cytometry crossmatch on the day of transplant. Serum samples at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months posttransplant were assessed for the presence of de novo HLA DSA.ResultsDe novo HLA DSA were detected in 22/67 (32.8%) LTR within 1‐year posttransplant. Of these, 9/41 (21.9%) occurred in the induction therapy group and 13/26 (50%) in the noninduction group. Class II DSA were detected in 3/41 (7.3%) LTR who received induction compared to 9/26 (34.6%) LTR without induction immunosuppression (p = .005). Differences in overall survival or freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction rates between the two groups were not statistically significant.ConclusionInduction immunosuppression utilizing a modified regimen of single‐dose rATG is associated with a significant reduction in de novo DSA production in LTR.

Abstract Introduction/Aims Cortical hyperexcitability is a feature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and cortical excitability can be measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Resting motor threshold (MT) is a measure of cortical excitability, largely driven by glutamate. Perampanel, a glutamate α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor blocker, is predicted to increase the cortical excitability threshold. This study aimed to evaluate TMS to functionally assess target engagement in a study of perampanel in ALS. Method We studied the MT of ALS patients randomized to a single dose of perampanel or placebo 5:1 hourly for 4 h. Twelve patients participated at 4 mg and 7 returned for dosing and retesting at 8 mg. The study was terminated in April 2020 due to coronavirus disease 2019‐related restrictions, after 7 out of 12 planned patients had received the 8 mg dose. Serum concentrations were also measured. Results Ten patients received the 4 mg dose (2 received placebo) and 5 received the 8 mg dose (2 received placebo). Motor Threshold increased at 2 h after dosing in the combined treatment group +7% of maximal stimulator output ( P < .01). Change could be detected in the larger 4 mg group ( P = .02), but not in the smaller 8 mg dose group ( P = .1). No side effects were reported after single dose exposure. Discussion This study shows that perampanel effects the physiology of upper motor neurons. Studies aiming at gauging the effect of perampanel on ALS disease progression are already ongoing. Motor threshold may serve as a marker of biological target engagement.

Abstract Background: Although risk of late relapse in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer is well established, most existing data pertain to the HR+ HER2-negative (HER2-) subgroup. CTS5 is one of the models for predicting risk of late relapse in HR+ HER2- breast cancer. However, the value of this model in HR+ HER2+ disease is less known, particularly in the context of adjuvant trastuzumab. Here, we evaluated CTS5 in patients with early stage HR+ HER2+ breast cancer treated in the NCCTG N9831 (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology) and NSABP B-31 (NRG) trials. Methods: Stage I-III HR+ (ER+ and/or PR+) HER2+ breast cancer patients who were free of recurrence after 5 years in N9831 and B-31 trials were included. The online CTS5 calculator was used to determine CTS5 score and risk group (low, intermediate, and high) based on age, tumor size, grade, and number of involved nodes. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates, Cox regression models, and C index were used for analysis. N9831 and B-31 trials were analyzed separately. Results: 1,204 patients in N9831 and 658 patients in B-31 met the entry criteria. Baseline characteristics were similar between both trials, including median age, tumor size, and follow up. Similar distribution within CTS5 risk group was observed in both trials; 68.2% and 70.1% patients were high risk, 24% and 21.9% as intermediate risk, as well as 7.8% and 8.1% as low risk classified in N9831 and B-31, respectively. Using univariate Cox regression analysis, CTS5 score as a continuous variable was associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the entire study cohort, including patients who received chemotherapy alone or in combination with trastuzumab, (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.03-1.81, p=0.03, C index 0.57 in N9831 and HR 1.36, 95%CI 1.06-1.76, p=0.02, C index 0.54 in B-31), but not in patients who received concurrent trastuzumab (HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.73-1.2, p=0.49, C index 0.54 in N9831 and HR 1.35, 95%CI 0.96-1.9, p=0.08, C index 0.54 in B-31). As categorical variable in the entire study cohort, CTS5 risk group was not significantly associated with RFS among patients with intermediate vs. low (HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.18-1.22, p=0.12 and HR 1.61, 95%CI 0.66-3.92, p=0.29) and high vs. low (HR 1.23, 95%CI 0.57-2.67, p=0.6 and HR 1.93, 95%CI 0.85-4.41, p=0.12) with the C index of 0.58 and 0.53 in N9831 and B-31 respectively. There was also no significant difference in RFS among 3 CTS5 risk groups with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Among patients who received concurrent trastuzumab, similar trends were observed with no statistical difference in RFS between high vs. low (HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.24-1.97, p=0.48 and HR 1.44, 95%CI 0.52-3.96, 0.49) with the C index of 0.55 and 0.51 in N9831 and B-31, respectively. Paradoxically, patients with intermediate risk had better RFS than low risk (HR 0.18, 95%CI 0.03-0.97, p=0.05) in N9831 but no significant difference in B-31 (HR 1.31, 95%CI 0.44-3.95, p=0.63). Conclusions: While CTS5 score as a continuous variable was associated with outcome in overall HR+ HER2+ population, this model was not prognostic in patients receiving adjuvant trastuzumab in both N9831 and B-31 trials. Furthermore, the correlation (C index) was modest and CTS5 risk group as a categorical variable could not stratify outcome in this group of patients. This study underlines the need to develop a new prognostic model to better delineate the risk of late relapse in HR+ HER2+ breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab as this model can facilitate clinical decision for extended adjuvant endocrine therapy. Support: BCRF-19-161, U10CA180821, U10CA180868 and U10CA180822 (NRG), Genentech. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Citation Format: Tanyami Pai, Angelica Gil, Yaohua Ma, Zhuo Li, Pooja Advani, Moreno Moreno-Aspitia, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Edith A. Perez, Yan Asmann, Katherine Pogue-Geile, E. A. Thompson, Saranya Chumsri. Prognostic value of clinical treatment score post-5 years (CTS5) and late relapse risk in hormone receptor-positive HER2-positive breast cancer in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 (Alliance) and NSABP B-31 (NRG) trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS6-03.

Abstract Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often the primary treatment modality for patients with intracranial metastatic disease. Despite advances in magnetic resonance imaging, including use of perfusion and diffusion sequences and molecular imaging, distinguishing radiation necrosis from progressive tumor remains a diagnostic and clinical challenge. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-fluciclovine PET to accurately distinguish radiation necrosis from recurrent intracranial metastatic disease in patients who had previously undergone SRS. Methods Fluciclovine PET imaging was performed in 8 patients with a total of 15 lesions that had previously undergone SRS and had subsequent MRI and clinical features suspicious for recurrent disease. The SUVmax of each lesion and the contralateral normal brain parenchyma were summated and evaluated at 4 different time points (5 minutes, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, and 55 minutes). Lesions were characterized as either recurrent disease (11 of 15 lesions) or radiation necrosis (4 of 15 lesions) and confirmed with histopathological correlation (7 lesions) or through serial MRI studies (8 lesions). Results Time activity curve analysis found statistically greater radiotracer accumulation for all lesions, including radiation necrosis, when compared to contralateral normal brain. While the mean and median SUVmax for recurrent disease was statistically greater than that of radiation necrosis at all time points, the difference was more significant at the earlier time points (p = 0.004 at 5 min – 0.025 at 55 min). Using a SUVmax threshold of ≥1.3, fluciclovine PET demonstrated a 100% accuracy in distinguishing recurrent disease from radiation necrosis up to 30 minutes after injection and an accuracy of 87% (sensitivity = 0.91, specificity = 0.75) at the last time point of 55 minutes. However, tumor to brain ratios (TBRmax) were not significantly different between recurrent disease and radiation necrosis at any time point due to variable levels of fluciclovine uptake in the background brain parenchyma. Conclusions Fluciclovine PET may play an important role in distinguishing active intracranial metastatic lesions from radiation necrosis in patients previously treated with SRS but needs to be validated in larger studies.

Abstract Background: Cardiac toxicity (CT) in the form of left ventricular systolic dysfunction is a well-known complication of anti-HER2 therapy. Prior clinical trial data has suggested potential factors associated with increased risk for CT. We sought to develop a clinical risk prediction model from real world patients to better identify patients who may be at higher risk for CT. Methods: Patients treated with anti-HER2 agents at all Mayo Clinic sites from Jan 2008 to July 2015 were reviewed. Patient data including age, race, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking history, baseline ejection fraction (EF), presence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), prior cancer treatments, number of anti-HER2 agents used, and cardiac medication use were recorded. Factors were compared in patients with and without development of CT. Cox regression models were used to identify univariate and multivariate predictors of CT. A risk score was then assigned based on the final multivariable model. Results: 604 patients were included in final analysis. Median follow-up 2.9 yrs; median age: 57 yr; baseline EF: 64%. One yr CT rate was 7%. Independent predictors of CT were age, baseline EF, LVH, and anthracycline use (C index=0.74). Based on model coefficient, scores of 1, 1, 2 and 3 were assigned to age&gt;55, EF &lt;60%, anthracycline exposure and LVH, respectively. Two random samples of 300 patients were created out of the original cohort for internal validation of the risk score model. In each, the risk score was found to be a highly significant predictor for CT with C index of 0.72 {HR 2.13 (95% CI 1.57-2.90), p &lt;0.001} and 0.77 {HR 2.45 (95% CI 1.74-3.44), p &lt;0.001}. Conclusions: Patients with risk factors of older age, lower baseline EF, anthracycline use and LVH are at increased risk for CT when treated with anti-HER2 agents. Using a risk prediction model at therapy initiation may enhance identification of patients who benefit from cardiology referral, closer cardiac monitoring, and/or prophylactic treatment while on anti-HER2 targeted therapy. Table 1. Multivariable Cox regression model predicting cardiac dysfunctionParameterParameter EstimateHR (95%CI)p valueScoreAge &gt;550.909552.48(1.27, 4.84)0.00751EF&lt;600.634361.89(1.01, 3.53)0.04751Anthracycline Exposure1.046132.85(1.48, 5.46)0.00162Baseline LVH1.633565.12(2.04,12.85)&lt;0.0013 Citation Format: Pooja P Advani, Lauren Cornell, Zhuo Li, Jordan Ray, Catalina Sanchez, Armando Villanueva, Taryn Smith, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia. A validated clinical risk prediction model for cardiac toxicity in patients treated with antiHER2 agents [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-14.

Abstract Introduction Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired disorder characterized by immune-mediated platelet destruction along with decreased platelet production. Adults with ITP are treated initially with glucocorticoids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and/or anti-D, but as many as 80% of patients (pts) will eventually relapse and become steroid-refractory. There is no universally agreed upon 2nd line therapy for ITP and consensus guidelines recommend either rituximab (R) or splenectomy (S) as acceptable, potentially curative options. Long-term responses to 2nd line S have been reported around 60%, and around 25% for R. It is unknown whether long-term outcome in the 3rd line setting is influenced by sequence of therapy. We evaluated the impact of sequence of 2nd and 3rdline therapy with R and/or S. Methods We identified all pts with ITP treated from 1990 through 2015 at the three Mayo Clinic (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) sites that were treated with R and/or S. Patients were excluded who were <18 years of age at the time of second-line treatment. Those with secondary ITP that received specific treatment for an infectious, autoimmune, or malignant condition causing thrombocytopenia were excluded. Patients with Evan's syndrome were included if the treatment was for thrombocytopenia, and not primarily for hemolytic anemia. For this analysis, secondary ITP was defined as ITP associated with hematologic malignancy. Hematologic malignancies did not require specific therapy at the time of treatment for ITP. Patients with uncontrolled infections or uncontrolled autoimmune disorders were excluded from analysis. We collected data from medical records regarding demographics, medical history, treatment history, response to treatment, and relapse. Medical history was captured for all concurrent diagnoses that could be considered associated with ITP including infectious and autoimmune conditions. Primary end-points were freedom from relapse after 2nd and 3rd line treatment with R or S. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate freedom from relapse after 2nd and 3rd line treatments. We also evaluated response to treatment, as defined by a platelet count >30,000/mm3 according to consensus guidelines. We performed three separate analyses for the entire cohort, primary ITP, and secondary ITP (separating out those with a concurrent diagnosis of malignancy). Results We identified 222 patients with a diagnosis of ITP, of which 191 had primary and 31 had secondary ITP. Treatment characteristics were similar in all groups except that pts treated initially with S were younger at diagnosis than pts treated with R (49 vs 60 years, P=0.003) and at time of 2ndline treatment (51.5 vs 61 years, P=0.018). For the overall cohort, patients treated with S as second-line therapy were more likely to achieve CR (86.6% vs 44%, P<0.0001), and had a significantly higher freedom from relapse at 5y (53.57% v. 14.96%, P<0.0001). Patients treated with S followed by R (S to R) had a trend towards higher 2y freedom from relapse than those treated with R followed by S (R to S) (69.48% v. 58.43%, P=0.3264). These data remained similar when primary ITP and secondary ITP were separated (data not shown). Conclusions These data support that S provides superior FFR at 5 years compared to R as second line treatment and suggests that, when needed, splenectomy followed by rituximab as opposed to rituximab followed by splenectomy might have a slight advantage. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background. Individuals after solid organ transplant may develop secondary malignancies. In our clinical practice, we noted an increasing number of individuals who developed colorectal cancers after solid organ transplantation. The primary aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of the patients who developed colorectal cancer after solid organ transplant. Materials and Methods. Data was gathered and merged from several registries at Mayo Clinic to identify all patients who received a diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer and solid organ transplant. Continuous variables were summarized as mean (standard deviation) and median (range), while categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). Time to colorectal cancer after transplant and overall survival after cancer diagnosis were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Results. Initially, 115 colorectal cancer patients who also had a transplant were identified. The diagnosis of colorectal cancer was noted after solid organ transplant in 63 patients. The mean age at transplant was 57 years. Majority had received a kidney transplant (44.4%) followed by liver (36.5%). The median time to develop colorectal cancer was 59.3 months (range: 4.4-251.4 months). 15 (24.6%) were stage 4 at diagnosis and 13 (21.3%) had stage 3 colorectal cancer. Median overall survival was 30.8 months; 5-, 10- and 15-year survival were noted to be 42.5%, 17.9%, and 7.5%, respectively. None of the stage 4 patients were alive at 5 years; 5-year survival rate for stage 1, 2, and 3 patients was 77%, 50%, and 42%, respectively. Conclusions. Our study reports on one of the largest cohorts of patients of colorectal cancer that developed the cancer after solid organ transplant. Survival is extremely poor for advanced cases. However, long-term survivors are noted who developed the cancer at a relatively early stage. Colorectal screening recommendations may need to be revised for patients after solid organ transplant.

Background— Cardiac manifestations of Marfan syndrome include aortic root dilation and mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Only scant data exist describing MVP in patients with Marfan syndrome undergoing aortic root replacement. Methods and Results— We retrospectively analyzed data from 166 MFS patients with MVP who were enrolled in a prospective multicenter registry of patients who underwent aortic root aneurysm repair. Of these 166 patients, 9% had mitral regurgitation (MR) grade >2, and 10% had MR grade 2. The severity of MVP and MR was evaluated by echocardiography preoperatively and ≤3 years postoperatively. Forty-one patients (25%) underwent composite graft aortic valve replacement, and 125 patients (75%) underwent aortic valve–sparing procedures; both groups had similar prevalences of MR grade >2 ( P =0.7). Thirty-three patients (20%) underwent concomitant mitral valve (MV) intervention (repair, n=29; replacement, n=4), including all 15 patients with MR grade >2. Only 1 patient required MV reintervention during follow-up (mean clinical follow-up, 31±10 months). Echocardiography performed 21±13 months postoperatively revealed MR >2 in only 3 patients (2%). One early death and 2 late deaths occurred. Conclusions— Although the majority of patients with Marfan syndrome who undergo elective aortic root replacement have MVP, only 20% have concomitant MV procedures. These concomitant procedures do not seem to increase operative risk. In patients with MR grade ≤2 who do not undergo a concomitant MV procedure, the short-term incidence of progressive MR is low; however, more follow-up is needed to determine whether patients with MVP and MR grade ≤2 would benefit from prophylactic MV intervention.

Background— Few data exist on long-term outcomes of elderly patients after aortic valve replacement. We evaluated latest follow-up information for patients ≥70 years of age after aortic valve replacement. Methods and Results— Late overall survival of 2890 consecutive patients ≥70 years of age who underwent aortic valve replacement between January 1993 and December 2007 was reviewed retrospectively, analyzed, and stratified by preoperative and intraoperative variables. Observed 5-, 10-, and 15-year late postoperative survival was lower than generally expected (68%, 34%, and 8% versus 70%, 42%, and 20%, respectively; P <0.001). Independent predictors of late death included older age, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, stroke, myocardial infarction, immunosuppression, prior coronary artery bypass grafting, implanted pacemaker, lower ejection fraction, hypertension, and New York Heart Association class III or IV. After stratification by age–comorbidity risk score, 10-year survival for the lowest-risk group (n=946 [33%]) was similar to expected survival (55% versus 55%; P =0.50), but for the highest-risk group (n=564 [20%]), survival was significantly lower than expected (9% versus 26%; P <0.001). For 229 pairs of propensity-matched patients with mechanical or biological prostheses, survival was not significantly different (67%, 40%, and 19% versus 71%, 45%, and 7% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively; P =0.81). Structural deterioration of bioprostheses occurred in 64 patients (2.4%). Conclusions— Survival of elderly patients after aortic valve replacement is influenced by age and preoperative comorbidities; 33% at lowest risk had overall survival similar to that of an age- and sex-matched general population. There was no sufficient evidence that valve type affected survival. Structural deterioration of aortic bioprostheses was rare.