Snyder‐Mackler, Lynn

Background Knee injuries are prevalent in cutting, pivoting, and jumping sports. Studies have investigated the effects of exercise-based knee injury prevention programs, however no clinical practice guidelines (CPG) exist. Objective 1) Review the evidence for exercise-based knee injury prevention programs, 2) identify if there are exercise-based knee injury prevention programs that are effective for particular groups of athletes, 3) explore the evidence for dosage and delivery of exercise-based knee injury prevention programs, 4) provide information on how exercise-based knee injury prevention should be implemented. Design Systematic review for CPG development. Setting Multiple. Patients (or Participants) Healthy, active individuals, particularly athletes participating in cutting, pivoting, and jumping sports. Interventions (or Assessment of Risk Factors) A systematic review of literature was performed via PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane databases for relevant articles addressing the effects of an exercise-based knee injury prevention program. The final search was performed in April, 2016 to identify all articles published prior to that point. Main Outcome Measurements The effects and outcomes of exercise-based knee injury prevention programs. Results Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria for this CPG. Exercise-based knee injury prevention programs have a low implementation cost and large relative risk reductions. Clinicians should implement an exercise-based knee injury prevention program for all athletes involved in cutting and pivoting type sports to reduce the number of significant knee injuries. The program should be implemented two to three times per week in the preseason and one to three times per week in the competitive season. It should consist of a combination of plyometric training, strength and power exercises, balance and dynamic stabilization training, core strengthening, technique training, and/or sports-specific drills. Conclusions This CPG will provide evidence based guidance for clinicians in choosing and implementing exercise-based knee injury prevention programs appropriate for the athlete(s) they work with.

Context: Interval sports programs are a critical rehabilitation element when preparing the injured athlete for a return to preinjury activities. There is currently no published interval hitting program to guide a return to unrestricted play for the volleyball athlete. Therefore, data-based, position-specific overhead hitting programs that control for intensity, time, and number of ball strikes were developed for female college volleyball players. Evidence Acquisition: Records from a single Division I varsity women’s volleyball team were examined for all matches during 7 consecutive years of team play. Data were collected for number of hitting and service attempts per game for each position and the number of games per match. Results: Per game, middle hitters averaged 4.51 attacks and 2.77 service attempts; right-side hitters, 3.58 attacks and 1.26 service attempts; outside hitters, 6.37 attacks and 3.44 service attempts; and setters and defensive specialists, 0.17 attacks and 1.78 service attempts. Conclusion: The interval hitting program can provide rehabilitation specialists with a data-based approach that may facilitate a return to play and minimize the risk of reinjury for volleyball athletes.

Context: Baseball throwing injuries are common. Emphasis on injury prevention and rehabilitation is made in an attempt to keep athletes on the field of competition. Interval throwing programs are an integral part of training, conditioning, and returning an injured baseball player to the game. Evidence Acquisition: Development of data-driven programs was based on the number, type, distance, and intensity of throws during games, across the spectrum of ages and positions for baseball athletes at all levels of play. Statistical analysis by age, position, and level of play determined the need for separate throwing programs. Means, the high range, game rules, and practical considerations were used to develop each data-based interval throwing program. Results: Data-based age and level-of-play interval throwing programs for pitchers, catchers, infielders, and outfielders have been developed, tested, and implemented for more than 10 years. Progression is based on type and location of injury, symptoms in response to throwing, and preinjury performance profile. Although the throwing programs are highly structured, there is ample opportunity to modify them to meet the needs of individual athletes. Conclusion: Data-based interval throwing programs for baseball athletes are an integral training and conditioning element for both injured and uninjured athletes who are preparing for sports participation. Medical team members should equip themselves with an understanding of how to use the programs for safe training, conditioning, and return to play.

Background: Identification of highly active individuals early after acute anterior cruciate ligament deficiency who are good candidates for nonoperative management is a clinical challenge. The University of Delaware has developed and validated a treatment algorithm and screening examination to distinguish between nonoperative and surgical candidates. Study Design: Review. Evidence Acquisition: A description of the decision-making rules and rehabilitation protocol for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency is provided. Results from clinical trials, outcome studies, and biomechanical investigations conducted using the treatment algorithm and screening examination are also reviewed. Results: Patients identified as nonoperative rehabilitation candidates using these clinical guidelines have a far greater success rate than what has been reported when patients self-select nonoperative management. Furthermore, nonoperative outcomes are improved when patients participate in a perturbation-enhanced rehabilitation protocol. Divergent lower extremity movement patterns are consistent with the different functional abilities of the dichotomous patient groups identified with the screening examination. Conclusion: Given the differential patient response to anterior cruciate ligament injury, implementation of the decision-making guidelines discussed in this review offers clinicians the opportunity to provide individualized patient care rather than continuing with a blanket surgical treatment strategy.