Back to Authors

Smith, Maxwell L.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9485-4036

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 62

Usual interstitial pneumonia- pattern fibrosis in surgical lung biopsies. Clinical, radiological and histopathological clues to aetiology
Dalurzo, Mercedes, Panse, Prasad M., Parish, James M., Leslie, Kevin O., Smith, Maxwell L.

Journal of Clinical Pathology | May 24, 2013 | Volume: 66 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 896-903

10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201442 Get It

Pulmonary fibrosis in surgical lung biopsies is said to have a ‘usual interstitial pneumonia- pattern ’ (UIP- pattern ) of disease when scarring of the parenchyma is present in a patchy, ‘temporally heterogeneous’ distribution. These biopsies are one of the more common non-neoplastic specimens surgical pathologists encounter and often pose a number of challenges. UIP is the expected histopathological pattern in patients with clinical idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but the UIP- pattern can be seen in other conditions on occasion. Most important among these are the rheumatic interstitial lung diseases (RILD) and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHrHP). Because theses entities have different mechanisms of injury, approach to therapy, and expected clinical progression, it is imperative for the surgical pathologist to correctly classify them. Taken in isolation, the UIP- pattern seen in patients with IPF may appear to overlap with that of RILD and CHrHP, at least when using the broadest definition of this term (patchy fibrosis). However, important distinguishing features are nearly always present in our experience, and the addition of a multidisciplinary approach will often resolve the critical differences between these diseases. In this manuscript, we review the distinguishing clinical, radiologic and histopathological features of UIP of IPF, RILD and CHrHP, based, in part, on the existing literature, but also lessons learned from a busy lung biopsy consultation practice.
The Effect of a Lean Quality Improvement Implementation Program on Surgical Pathology Specimen Accessioning and Gross Preparation Error Frequency
Wilkerson, Trent, Grzybicki, Dana M., Raab, Stephen S., Smith, Maxwell L.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology | August 21, 2012 | Volume: 138 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 367-373

10.1309/ajcp3yxid2uhzpht Get It

Abstract Few reports have documented the effectiveness of Lean quality improvement in changing anatomic pathology patient safety. We used Lean methods of education; hoshin kanri goal setting and culture change; kaizen events; observation of work activities, hand-offs, and pathways; A3-problem solving, metric development, and measurement; and frontline work redesign in the accessioning and gross examination areas of an anatomic pathology laboratory. We compared the pre- and post-Lean implementation proportion of near-miss events and changes made in specific work processes. In the implementation phase, we documented 29 individual A3-root cause analyses. The pre- and postimplementation proportions of process- and operator-dependent near-miss events were 5.5 and 1.8 (P < .002) and 0.6 and 0.6, respectively. We conclude that through culture change and implementation of specific work process changes, Lean implementation may improve pathology patient safety.