Echevarria‐Cruz, Evelyn

Abstract Objective Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residency remains highly competitive, with persistent disparities in applicant representation. This study presents a cross‐sectional analysis of OHNS residency and faculty demographics using 2025 program rosters, evaluating degree type (MD vs DO), geographic distribution, and leadership influence. Study Design A cross‐sectional review. Setting All US ACGME‐accredited OHNS residency programs, with data collected in 2024 to 2025. Methods Demographic data were collected on OHNS faculty and residents, including post‐graduate year (PGY) 1 through PGY5 trainees at the time of data collection, corresponding to entry years from 2020 to 2024 across all US ACGME‐accredited residency programs. Data was extracted from official program websites, FREIDA, ACGME, NRMP, and social media. Programs with incomplete data, those using the military match, and non‐accredited sites were excluded. Descriptive statistics, χ 2 tests, and correlation analyses were performed ( p < .05). Results Of 131 programs, 125 were analyzed at the program level and 121 at the faculty level. DO residents were concentrated in Michigan (59%), Ohio (50%), and Oklahoma (50%). DO representation correlated with DO faculty ( r = .82, p < .0001), DO program director ( r = .95, p < .0001), and former AOA program designation ( r = .92, p < .0001). A negative correlation existed between program size and DO resident ( r = –.4, p < .0001). Conclusion Despite growing diversity following the single accreditation system, disparities persist in OHNS. DO residents remain underrepresented and geographically concentrated, with representation strongly associated with osteopathic faculty presence, program leadership, and prior AOA affiliation.

Introduction: Laryngopharyngeal symptoms (LPS) refer to aerodigestive complaints that may result from the retrograde flow of gastric contents into the upper aerodigestive tract. These symptoms may be under-recognised in populations exposed to mechanical or environmental stressors. Divers may be at increased risk due to factors such as pressure changes and body positioning. This study characterised the prevalence and severity of LPS among divers and identified associated risk factors. Methods: A cross-sectional, anonymous survey was distributed to members of the Divers Alert Network (DAN). Collected data included demographics, diving-related behaviours, medical history, and LPS burden measured using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). Results: Of the 309 survey responses analysed, 47.2% were male with a median age of 50.0 years (IQR: 40.0−60.0). Among 291 divers with complete RSI data, 26.1% (95% CI, 21.4–31.5%) had abnormal RSI scores, representing a +16.0 percentage-point increase (95% CI, 11.3%−21.4%) over non-diving population estimates (P &#x0003C; 0.001). In multivariable analysis, female sex (adjusted prevalence rate [aPR] 1.59, 95% CI 1.07–2.37) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) history (aPR 1.75, 95% CI 1.16–2.65) were independent predictors. Recreational divers had a lower risk (aPR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39–0.90). Approximately 5% of respondents described their symptoms as life-threatening. Conclusions: Divers may represent an under-recognised population at elevated risk for LPS. Female sex and GERD history were associated with greater symptom burden, while recreational diving appeared less provocative compared to technical diving. These findings may have implications for risk stratification and symptom management in the diving community.