Ehlers, Shawna L.

PURPOSE Over 50% of households in the United States have at least one musician—many musicians are also breast cancer survivors. This group has not been well studied, and given the level of fine sensory-motor skill required for musicianship, we hypothesized that musicians experience unique manifestations of breast cancer treatment toxicities. METHODS A nine-item Musical Toxicity Questionnaire (MTQ) was distributed to patients who had consented to participate in the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Registry. The MTQ screened participants by asking if they played a musical instrument or sang in the last 10 years: questions populated for those who answered yes. Respondents were asked if they noticed difficulty with their musical endeavor during or after breast cancer treatment, defined as acute musical toxicity (AMT). The questionnaire asked which side effect and cancer-directed therapy most influenced musical ability, what musical attributes were affected, and the timeline of resolution. Multivariable and classification tree analyses assessed relationships between AMT and treatment characteristics. RESULTS Of 1,871 survey respondents, 29% (535/1,871) self-identified as musicians. Over a quarter (27%, 144/535) reported AMT, and for 57% (82/144), AMT had not resolved at the time of survey. Of the treatments each participant received, chemotherapy was most often reported as most negatively impactful (63/89 who received chemotherapy, 71%). Decreased endurance was the most common musical difficulty (64% of those with AMT, 92/144), followed by decreased accuracy, trouble playing/singing quickly, and difficulty using proper technique. Multivariable and classification tree analyses revealed that receipt of chemotherapy was most strongly correlated with AMT. CONCLUSION These results will help oncology care teams counsel musicians, answer questions about impacts on musicality, and provide a timeline for resolution of musical symptoms.

Stress is ubiquitous in our modern society and contributes to many disease states. This narrative review describes the effect of stress/distress on cancer development and progression. Seminal randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and distress management guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the Society for Integrative LinearOncology (SIO) are highlighted. We describe the physiological effects of distress, distress assessment, and management. Psychological treatments are summarized. Evidence-based lifestyle modifications and integrative therapies are reviewed in detail, including mindfulness-based techniques, yoga, guided imagery, breathing techniques, hypnosis, exercise, music therapy, qigong/Tai Chi, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing, and improving sleep and heart rate variability. Recognition and treatment of distress can improve quality of life. More research is needed to determine the effects of managing distress on cancer outcomes, as well as the best type and duration of intervention, noting that the benefits of interventions may be specific for patients with different cancer types.

12065 Background: Incidence of cancer, including colorectal, breast, pancreas, kidney, and uterine cancer, is increasing in younger populations. Adolescents and young adults (AYA, defined as age 15-39) with cancer face unique challenges. This study aimed to characterize how symptom burden differs between AYA and non-AYA (aged 40+) patients with cancer. Methods: We performed a subgroup analysis of the E2C2 study, a cluster-randomized, pragmatic trial examining the effectiveness of routine symptom assessment and guideline-based management on patient-centered and healthcare utilization metrics during and following cancer treatment. Six symptoms [Sleep disturbance, Pain, Physical function impairment, Anxiety, Depression, and Energy deficit/fatigue (SPPADE)] were evaluated using 11-point numerical rating scales (NRS). Symptom severity was classified as mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10). We conducted a subgroup analysis of symptom burden among AYA patients (defined as age 18-39 in this study), using their first-reported NRS scores. Results: The E2C2 cohort included 2,598 AYA patients and 38,061 non-AYA patients who completed >1 SPPADE NRS on at least one survey. AYA patients were more likely than non-AYA patients to report severe anxiety ( p<0.0001) and depression ( p<0.0001) (Table). Non-AYA patients were more likely to report severe pain ( p=0.02179), fatigue ( p=0.0022), and physical function limitations ( p<0.0001). Sociodemographic differences were also noted. A higher proportion of AYA patients held a bachelor’s degree or higher (38% vs 28%), were employed (73% vs 37%), and lived in an urban setting (67% vs 56%), compared to non-AYA patients. Non-AYA patients were more likely to have government insurance (63% vs 21%) and to be married (72% vs 59%). Conclusions: AYA patients with cancer were more likely to report severe depression and anxiety compared to their counterparts age 40 and above, underscoring the need for targeted and tailored psycho-oncology care for this population. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: SPPADE symptoms (Sleep disturbance, Pain, Physical function impairment, Anxiety, Depression/distress, and Energy deficits/fatigue) may result from cancer and its treatment. The aim of this analysis was to characterize SPPADE symptoms in patients with breast cancer. Methods. SPPADE data were drawn from the Enhanced, EHR-facilitated Cancer Symptom Control (E2C2) study, a stepped-wedge pragmatic cluster-randomized trial designed to evaluate a symptom management intervention in routine practice (NCT03892967). Symptom severity was measured on a 0-10 scale via a survey administered by patient portal, in-clinic tablet, or interactive voice response system (by phone) prior to, during, or soon after an outpatient oncology encounter. Scores of 4-6 were categorized as “moderate” and ≥7 as “severe.” In this analysis, only the data from each patient’s initial survey were included. Results. A total of 9,651 patients with breast cancer completed an initial E2C2 survey between March 2019 and January 2023. The proportion of patients with moderate or severe SPPADE symptoms were as follows: 22% moderate and 10% severe for insomnia; 18% moderate and 7% severe for pain; 17% moderate and 7% severe for anxiety; 15% moderate and 5% severe for emotional distress; 25% moderate and 12% severe for fatigue; and 22% moderate and 8% severe for impaired physical function. Table 1 presents score means and standard deviations by demographic subgroup. Conclusions. SPPADE symptoms are common in patients with breast cancer. These observations warrant routine implementation of symptom surveillance and management in breast oncology. Funding acknowledgement: The Improving the Management of symPtoms during And following Cancer Treatment (IMPACT) Consortium is a Cancer Moonshot Research Initiative under the authorization of the 2016 United States 21st Century Cures Act. This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the NIH, UM1CA233033 (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN). Insomnia, Pain, Anxiety, Distress, Fatigue, and Functional Impairment in Patients with Breast Cancer Citation Format: Kathryn Ruddy, Veronica Grzegorczyk, Deirdre Pachman, Sandra Mitchell, Bolun Liu, Deanne Smith, Ciara O'Sullivan, Shawna Ehlers, Jeph Herrin, Parvez Rahman, Andrea Cheville. Insomnia, Pain, Anxiety, Distress, Fatigue, and Functional Impairment in Patients with Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-12-09.

Abstract Objective Emotional distress has been correlated with greater healthcare utilization and economic costs in cancer; however, the prospective relationship between positive distress screens and future healthcare utilization is less clear. Taken together, there is a critical need to synthesize studies examining the prospective relationship between emotional distress and future healthcare use to inform distress management protocols and motivate institutional resource allocation to distress management. The aim of the systematic review is to explore the relationship between emotional distress, measured via validated emotional distress questionnaires, and subsequent healthcare utilization in patients diagnosed with cancer. Methods A systematic search of seven databases was conducted on 29 March 2022 and updated 3 August 2023. Eligibility criteria were: (1) peer‐reviewed, (2) quantitative or mixed methods, (3) adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with cancer, (4) cancer distress questionnaire(s) completed prior to healthcare utilization, and (5) written in English. Exclusion criteria included: (1) non‐emotional aspects of distress (i.e., spiritual or physical distress), (2) healthcare utilization characterized via economic or monetary variables, and (3) caregiver or non‐cancer populations. Results Nineteen peer‐reviewed articles were included in the review. There was significant heterogeneity in emotional distress instruments and type of healthcare utilization used. Most studies examining general distress or anxiety found that increased distress was predictive of greater future healthcare utilization. Conclusion The results suggest that individuals with higher levels of general distress and anxiety are at increased risk for future healthcare utilization.

Background: Cancer distress management is an evidence-based component of comprehensive cancer care. Group-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for cancer distress (CBT-C) is the first distress treatment associated with replicated survival advantages in randomized clinical trials. Despite research supporting patient satisfaction, improved outcomes, and reduced costs, CBT-C has not been tested sufficiently within billable clinical settings, profoundly reducing patient access to best-evidence care. This study aimed to adapt and implement manualized CBT-C as a billable clinical service. Patients and Methods: A stakeholder-engaged, mixed-methods, hybrid implementation study design was used, and the study was conducted in 3 phases: (1) stakeholder engagement and adaptation of CBT-C delivery, (2) patient and therapist user testing and adaptation of CBT-C content, and (3) implementation of practice-adapted CBT-C as a billable clinical service focused on evaluation of reach, acceptability, and feasibility across stakeholder perspectives. Results: A total of 40 individuals and 7 interdisciplinary group stakeholders collectively identified 7 primary barriers (eg, number of sessions, workflow concerns, patient geographic distance from center) and 9 facilitators (eg, favorable financial model, emergence of oncology champions). CBT-C adaptations made before implementation included expanding eligibility criteria beyond breast cancer, reducing number of sessions to 5 (10 total hours), eliminating and adding content, and revising language and images. During implementation, 252 patients were eligible; 100 (40%) enrolled in CBT-C (99% covered by insurance). The primary reason for declining enrollment was geographic distance. Of enrollees, 60 (60%) consented to research participation (75% women; 92% white). All research participants completed at least 60% of content (6 of 10 hours), with 98% reporting they would recommend CBT-C to family and friends. Conclusions: CBT-C implementation as a billable clinical service was acceptable and feasible across cancer care stakeholder measures. Future research is needed to replicate acceptability and feasibility results in more diverse patient groups, test effectiveness in clinical settings, and reduce barriers to access via remote delivery platforms.

Key points Psycho‐oncology, a multidisciplinary field that addresses the patients' and their caregivers' physical, psychological, social, and behavioral well‐being, is extensively integrated in cancer care in high‐income countries Psycho‐oncology services remain underdeveloped, fragmented, and poorly implemented in low‐ and middle‐income countries, particularly those in the Arab Middle East and North Africa region To upgrade these services, accommodation to both (i) the unique needs of Arab low‐ and middle‐income countries and (ii) the best practices of psycho‐oncology is crucial There is scarcity of research on the barriers and challenges faced during building or expanding psycho‐oncology services in the Arab low‐ and middle‐income countries We summarize a priori challenges that may be encountered in psychosocial capacity building in similar Arab low‐ and middle‐income countries using Lebanon as a pilot program

Abstract Introduction: Patients at extremes of age may be particularly vulnerable to poor physical and mental health after treatment for breast cancer; we examined factors associated with poor health in older breast cancer survivors. Methods: The Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry (MCBDR) is a prospective longitudinal cohort study that enrolls Mayo Clinic Rochester patients diagnosed with stage 0-4 breast cancer (BC). In 2020, we mailed a survey to 1,273 MCBDR participants aged 77+. Three PROMIS-10 items were used to assess overall health, mental health, and physical function. Self-reported comorbidities were also collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant (p&lt;0.05) predictors of overall health, mental health, and physical function. Independent variables included demographics, clinical characteristics, and comorbidities. Results: 848/1273 MCBDR participants (67%) responded, 842 reporting their overall health. Median age at survey return was 82 years (range 77-100), and the median time since cancer diagnosis was 12 years. Excellent or very good overall health, mental health, and physical function were reported by 48%, 63.5%, and 77.1%, respectively. Older age was associated with poorer self-reported overall health, as were heart disease, diabetes, and lung disease, reported by 18%, 14%, and 7%, respectively (p&lt;0.05 for all; see Table). Only heart disease was statistically significantly associated with poorer mental health (p=0.03). Physical function was reportedly better in survivors without a history of diabetes, stroke, or lung disease (p&lt;0.05 for all), and in those who were closer to their cancer diagnosis (p=0.03). Tumor characteristics were not associated with overall health, mental health, or physical function. Conclusions: Comorbidities are common and impact self-reported overall health, mental health, and physical function in older breast cancer survivors. Table: Multivariate logistic regression model for overall health Overall health self-reported as excellent or very good No Yes Total p-value (N=437) (N=405) (N=842) Age at survey (years) &lt;.001 Mean (SD) 82.8 (4.22) 81.7 (3.85) 82.3 (4.08) Median (range) 82.0 (77.0, 96.0) 81.0 (77.0, 100.0) 82.0 (77.0, 100.0) Years from cancer diagnosis to survey 0.708 Mean (SD) 12.1 (5.16) 11.8 (5.47) 11.9 (5.31) Median (range) 12.2 (3.1, 36.9) 11.5 (3.1, 36.4) 12.0 (3.1, 36.9) T stage T2 or higher, n (%) 0.276 No 357 (81.7%) 337 (83.2%) 694 (82.4%) Yes 80 (18.3%) 68 (16.8%) 148 (17.6%) N stage N1 or higher, n (%) 0.185 No 376 (86.0%) 339 (83.7%) 715 (84.9%) Yes 61 (14.0%) 66 (16.3%) 127 (15.1%) M stage M1, n (%) 0.313 No 434 (99.3%) 404 (99.8%) 838 (99.5%) Yes 3 (0.7%) 1 (0.2%) 4 (0.5%) Race, n (%) 0.460 Non-White 13 (3.0%) 8 (2.0%) 21 (2.5%) White 424 (97.0%) 397 (98.0%) 821 (97.5%) Heart disease, n (%) &lt;.001 No 334 (76.4%) 353 (87.2%) 687 (81.6%) Yes 103 (23.6%) 52 (12.8%) 155 (18.4%) High blood pressure, n (%) 0.376 No 168 (38.4%) 188 (46.4%) 356 (42.3%) Yes 269 (61.6%) 217 (53.6%) 486 (57.7%) Stroke, n (%) 0.195 No 407 (93.1%) 392 (96.8%) 799 (94.9%) Yes 30 (6.9%) 13 (3.2%) 43 (5.1%) Diabetes, n (%) &lt;.001 No 355 (81.2%) 370 (91.4%) 725 (86.1%) Yes 82 (18.8%) 35 (8.6%) 117 (13.9%) Lung disease, n (%) 0.023 No 394 (90.2%) 386 (95.3%) 780 (92.6%) Yes 43 (9.8%) 19 (4.7%) 62 (7.4%) Liver disease, n (%) 0.345 No 425 (97.3%) 401 (99.0%) 826 (98.1%) Yes 12 (2.7%) 4 (1.0%) 16 (1.9%) Kidney disease, n (%) 0.240 No 408 (93.4%) 392 (96.8%) 800 (95.0%) Yes 29 (6.6%) 13 (3.2%) 42 (5.0%) Citation Format: Dhauna Karam, Robert A. Vierkant, Shawna Ehlers, Rachel A. Freedman, Nicole Larson, Charles L. Loprinzi, Fergus Couch, Janet Olson, Kathryn J. Ruddy. Physical function, mental health, and overall health of older breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5262.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the long-term quality of life (QOL) of patients with aggressive lymphoma subtypes treated with autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (autoHCT) compared with those without history of transplant. METHODS: Patient-reported QOL measures were prospectively gathered from patients enrolled in the Iowa/Mayo Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource cohort with aggressive lymphoma subtypes. QOL was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Profile of Mood States instruments and with a numeric rating scale for overall QOL and spiritual QOL. The autoHCT group and no HCT groups were compared at 3 years (FU3) and 6 years (FU6) after lymphoma diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 980 patients with lymphoma (106 autoHCT and 874 no HCT) diagnosed between 2002 and 2013 were included for analysis. The mean FACT-G total score was similar in the autoHCT and no HCT groups at FU3 (89.9 v 90.1, P = .64) and also at FU6 (91.5 v 89.6, P = .44). No differences between the autoHCT and no HCT groups were identified in the FACT subscales. The STAI identified lower anxiety in the autoHCT group by mean STAI1 (state) at FU3 (30.1 v 33.4, P < .01) and by mean STAI2 (trait) at FU6 (30.1 v 33.5, P = .02). No other clinically meaningful differences were identified between the two groups using the other QOL instruments. CONCLUSION: Patients remaining in remission at 3 and 6 years after diagnosis had a high level of QOL with no significant differences associated with history of treatment with autoHCT.