Back to Authors

Alumkal, Preeth

Mayo Clinic

University of Illinois Chicago

Citations 2

One-Hour Esophageal String Test: A Nonendoscopic Minimally Invasive Test That Accurately Detects Disease Activity in Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Ackerman, Steven J. , Kagalwalla, Amir F. , Hirano, Ikuo , Gonsalves, Nirmala , Katcher, Paul Menard, Gupta, Sandeep K. , Grozdanović, Milica, Pan, Zhaoxing , Masterson, Joanne C. , Fantus, Robert J., Alumkal, Preeth, Ochkur, Sergei I. , Ahmed, Faria , Melín‐Aldana, Héctor, Biette, Kathryn A. , Dubner, Allison , Amsden, Katie, Keeley, Kaitlin, Sulkowski, Maureen, Zalewski, Angelika , Atkins, Dan, Furuta, Glenn T. , Ochkur, Sergei, Wechsler, Joshua B , Du, Jian, Lee, James J. , Capocelli, Kelley E.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | September 24, 2019 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1614-1625

10.14309/ajg.0000000000000371 Get It

OBJECTIVES: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), a chronic food allergic disease, lacks sensitive and specific peripheral biomarkers. We hypothesized that levels of EoE-related biomarkers captured using a 1-hour minimally invasive Esophageal String Test (EST) would correlate with mucosal eosinophil counts and tissue concentrations of these same biomarkers. We aimed to determine whether a 1-hour EST accurately distinguishes active from inactive EoE or a normal esophagus. METHODS: In a prospective, multisite study, children and adults (ages 7–55 years) undergoing a clinically indicated esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed an EST with an esophageal dwell time of 1 hour. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: active EoE, inactive EoE, and normal esophageal mucosa. Eosinophil-associated protein levels were compared between EST effluents and esophageal biopsy extracts. Statistical modeling was performed to select biomarkers that best correlated with and predicted eosinophilic inflammation. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four subjects (74 children, 60 adults) with active EoE (n = 62), inactive EoE (n = 37), and patient controls with a normal esophagus (n = 35) completed the study. EST-captured eosinophil-associated biomarkers correlated significantly with peak eosinophils/high-power field, endoscopic visual scoring, and the same proteins extracted from mucosal biopsies. Statistical modeling, using combined eotaxin-3 and major basic protein-1 concentrations, led to the development of EoE scores that distinguished subjects with active EoE from inactive EoE or normal esophagi. Eighty-seven percent of children, 95% of parents, and 92% of adults preferred the EST over endoscopy if it provided similar information. DISCUSSION: The 1-hour EST accurately distinguishes active from inactive EoE in children and adults and may facilitate monitoring of disease activity in a safe and minimally invasive fashion.
The oesophageal string test: a novel, minimally invasive method measures mucosal inflammation in eosinophilic oesophagitis
Furuta, Glenn T. , Kagalwalla, Amir F. , Lee, James J. , Alumkal, Preeth, Maybruck, Brian T., Fillon, Sophie, Masterson, Joanne C. , Ochkur, Sergei I. , Protheroe, Cheryl, Moore, Wendy , Pan, Zhaoxing , Amsden, Katie, Robinson, Z. D. , Mukkada, Vincent A. , Atkins, Dan, Fleischer, David M., Hosford, Lindsay , Kwatia, Mark A., Schroeder, Shauna , Kelly, Caleb , Lovell, Mark A. , Melín‐Aldana, Héctor, Ackerman, Steven J. , Capocelli, Kelley E.

Gut | August 15, 2012 | Volume: 62 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1395-1405

10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303171 Get It

Objective Eosinophil predominant inflammation characterises histological features of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). Endoscopy with biopsy is currently the only method to assess oesophageal mucosal inflammation in EoE. We hypothesised that measurements of luminal eosinophil-derived proteins would correlate with oesophageal mucosal inflammation in children with EoE. Design The Enterotest diagnostic device was used to develop an oesophageal string test (EST) as a minimally invasive clinical device. EST samples and oesophageal mucosal biopsies were obtained from children undergoing upper endoscopy for clinically defined indications. Eosinophil-derived proteins including eosinophil secondary granule proteins (major basic protein-1, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil peroxidase) and Charcot–Leyden crystal protein/galectin-10 were measured by ELISA in luminal effluents eluted from ESTs and extracts of mucosal biopsies. Results ESTs were performed in 41 children with active EoE (n=14), EoE in remission (n=8), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (n=4) and controls with normal oesophagus (n=15). EST measurement of eosinophil-derived protein biomarkers significantly distinguished between children with active EoE, treated EoE in remission, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and normal oesophagus. Levels of luminal eosinophil-derived proteins in EST samples significantly correlated with peak and mean oesophageal eosinophils/high power field (HPF), eosinophil peroxidase indices and levels of the same eosinophil-derived proteins in extracts of oesophageal biopsies. Conclusions The presence of eosinophil-derived proteins in luminal secretions is reflective of mucosal inflammation in children with EoE. The EST is a novel, minimally invasive device for measuring oesophageal eosinophilic inflammation in children with EoE.