Ohnishi, Toshio

Abstract Segmental bronchoprovocation (SBP) with allergen was used in an attempt to study eosinophils recruited to the airway 24 h after challenge. Unexpectedly, in the first four patients, neutrophils (rather than eosinophils) were recruited in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids, and we hypothesized that the allergen extracts were contaminated with endotoxin. The extracts used for challenge in the first four patients tested positive for bacterial endotoxin in a limulus amebocyte lysate assay. Rechallenge of one patient from the first group with a comparable dose of an endotoxin-free extract and SBP with endotoxin-free extract in five additional patients resulted in preferential recruitment of eosinophils rather than neutrophils. The number of neutrophils recovered from the challenged segments in the patients challenged with endotoxin-free extract was significantly less than that observed in the first four patients. Taken together, these observations suggest that neutrophil recruitment in the 24-h BAL fluids from the first four patients was probably due to endotoxin contamination of the allergen extract. We caution investigators that endotoxin contamination of allergen extract may alter the cellular inflammation during the late airway response following allergen challenge.

Abstract The mechanism of airway eosinophilia during antigen-induced inflammation was investigated by measurement of eosinophil-active cytokines utilizing an eosinophil survival assay. In the first study, 4 patients with allergic rhinitis underwent segmental bronchoprovocation (SBP) with low, medium, and high doses of ragweed extract instilled into different bronchial subsegments; bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids were collected from each segment 12 min and 48 h after challenge. Eosinophil granule proteins and eosinophil survival activity were significantly elevated in the 48-h (late-phase) BAL fluids from these segments. Correlations were observed between the concentrations of eosinophil granule proteins and eosinophil survival activity (rs = 0.717 to 0.880, p < 0.001) in BAL fluids. Eosinophil survival activity was completely neutralized by anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody in five of the seven 48-h samples tested representing three of the 4 patients. In the two remaining samples, eosinophil survival activity was only partially neutralized by either anti-IL-5 antibody or anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) but was completely neutralized by anti-IL-5 and anti-GM-CSF in combination. Subsequently, in the second study, 10 patients with allergic rhinitis were challenged by SBP with ragweed extract. Eosinophil survival activity was significantly elevated in the 48-h BAL fluids; this activity was partially neutralized by anti-IL-5 antibody about (48%) and completely neutralized by the combination of anti-IL-5 and anti-GM-CSF antibodies. These findings suggest that the eosinophil survival activity in the late inflammatory lesions following SBP with allergen is mainly associated with IL-5, with small contributions from GM-CSF. Thus, IL-5 is the predominant eosinophil-active cytokine present in BAL fluids during allergen-induced late-phase inflammation and may play a key role in the pathophysiology of allergen-induced, eosinophil-predominant airway inflammation.

SUMMARY Eosinophils and eosinophil granule proteins may play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. BALF from 40 patients with symptomatic asthma were analysed for cytokine activity by the eosinophil survival assay. BALF from 15 patients showed increased survival activity. Survival activities in BALF from four of these patients were almost completely blocked by anti-IL-5 MoAb, and the remaining activities were blocked by anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), anti-IL-3 antibody, or both. Surprisingly, BALF samples from the other 25 patients decreased eosinophil viabilities below the levels of medium control. The inhibitory factor in these BALF was of low molecular weight, was heat-stable, was largely overcome by excess exogenously added cytokines, and was positively correlated with the concentrations of lidocaine in the BALF. Lidocaine itself inhibited eosinophil survival at concentrations less than those present in the BALF. These findings indicate that lidocaine is an inhibitor of cytokines in the eosinophil survival assay, and they suggest the need for caution in analyses of BALF containing lidocaine or other local anaesthetics.