Nooka, Ajay

Abstract Although the human genome encodes a vast repertoire of noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression, the noncoding genome remains underexplored due to technical challenges. Specifically, during transcriptomic sequencing data alignment, the overlap between noncoding and coding loci can create ambiguous read alignments that are subsequently discarded from downstream analysis. For this reason, most of the noncoding genome is excluded from standard genomic annotations used for sequencing alignment. To address this challenge and enable concurrent profiling of the coding and noncoding transcriptome, we systematically integrated standard coding (GENCODE) and noncoding (LncBook) genome annotations, preserving coding gene annotations and removing overlapping noncoding regions. The resulting integrated genome annotation expanded the number of annotated noncoding genes from 40,785 to 138,296 while preserving all coding genes and reducing ambiguous read assignment. To evaluate the utility of our integrated genome annotation for uncovering novel, biologically relevant noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), we realigned CD138-positive bulk RNA-seq (N = 942) and CD138-negative single-cell RNA-seq (N = 478) data from the MMRF CoMMpass study, generating a comprehensive coding-noncoding atlas of the myeloma bone marrow microenvironment with noncoding genes representing 51% of highly variable genes and displaying significant cell type specificity. Tumor expression profiling based on this integrated profiling identified 15 clusters, including two enriched for amp(1q21) or t(4;14) and associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS). Differential expression and systematic filtering yielded 19 candidate high-risk ncRNAs, including previously uncharacterized ENSG00000310209 , which was associated with poor PFS (HR = 1.141, P = 0.0025), increased IRF4 activity, Wnt pathway activation, CCL5 signaling, and the accumulation of anergic-like CD8+ T cells. These findings establish integrated coding-noncoding analysis as a strategic approach for discovering functional ncRNAs from transcriptomic sequencing data.

Purpose Selinexor, a first-in-class, oral, selective exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibitor, induces apoptosis in cancer cells through nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins and the glucocorticoid receptor, along with inhibition of translation of oncoprotein mRNAs. We studied selinexor in combination with low-dose dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma refractory to the most active available agents. Patients and Methods This phase II trial evaluated selinexor 80 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg, both orally and twice weekly, in patients with myeloma refractory to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide (quad-refractory disease), with a subset also refractory to an anti-CD38 antibody (penta-refractory disease). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Results Of 79 patients, 48 had quad-refractory and 31 had penta-refractory myeloma. Patients had received a median of seven prior regimens. The ORR was 21% and was similar for patients with quad-refractory (21%) and penta-refractory (20%) disease. Among patients with high-risk cytogenetics, including t(4;14), t(14;16), and del(17p), the ORR was 35% (six of 17 patients). The median duration of response was 5 months, and 65% of responding patients were alive at 12 months. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (59%), anemia (28%), neutropenia (23%), hyponatremia (22%), leukopenia (15%), and fatigue (15%). Dose interruptions for adverse events occurred in 41 patients (52%), dose reductions occurred in 29 patients (37%), and treatment discontinuation occurred in 14 patients (18%). Conclusion The combination of selinexor and dexamethasone has an ORR of 21% in patients with heavily pretreated, refractory myeloma with limited therapeutic options.