Back to Authors

Wu, Christina S.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Hospital

Citations 2

Addition of High-Dose Vitamin D 3 to Standard Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Ng, Kimmie, Zemla, Tyler, Jackson, Nadine, Kalyan, Aparna, Devoe, Craig, Shusterman, Michael , Vijayvergia, Namrata , Wu, Christina S., Cohen, Stacey A., Pulsipher, Sidney, Shergill, Ardaman, Watson, Yasmeem, Kleiber, Barbara , Lee, Myounghee, Kohn, Christine G. , Zuckerman, Dan, Hollis, Bruce W., O’Reilly, Eileen M., Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A., Pulsipher, Sydney , Ng, Kimmie , Ou, Fang‐Shu , Zemla, Tyler , Devoe, Craig , Cohen, Stacey A. , Thalappillil, Jennifer S. , Schwartz, Lawrence H. , Zuckerman, Dan, Hollis, Bruce W. , O’Reilly, Eileen M. , Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A.

JAMA | August 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jama.2026.9350 Get It

Importance In a phase 2 randomized clinical trial, high-dose vitamin D 3 added to standard treatment improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard-dose vitamin D 3 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Objective To determine if high-dose vitamin D 3 added to standard chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with previously untreated mCRC. Design, Setting, and Participants Double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolling 455 patients with previously untreated mCRC, conducted in the US through the National Clinical Trials Network from October 2019 to December 2022 (database freeze: July 15, 2024). Interventions mFOLFOX6 (modified FOLFOX6 [5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin]) or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab every 2 weeks with either high-dose vitamin D 3 (8000 IU daily × 14 days as loading dose followed by 4000 IU daily) or standard-dose vitamin D 3 (400 IU daily) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was PFS assessed by the unstratified log-rank test. Secondary end points included objective response rate, overall survival, and toxicity. Prespecified subgroup analyses of PFS were performed according to known prognostic factors. Results Among 455 randomized patients (median age, 59 years; 181 [40%] female) with median follow-up 20 months, the median PFS for high-dose vitamin D 3 (n = 228) was 11.8 months (95% CI, 10.3-13.3) vs 10.3 months (95% CI, 9.4-12.2) for standard-dose vitamin D 3 (n = 227) (1-sided log-rank P = .25). There were no significant differences in objective response rate between high-dose and standard-dose vitamin D 3 (51% [95% CI, 44%-58%] vs 44% [95% CI, 37%-50%], respectively; P = .12), or in overall survival (median, 25.6 vs 27.0 months; 1-sided log-rank P = .66). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the most common grade 3 or greater adverse events between the high- and standard-dose groups, including neutropenia (n = 67 [32%] vs n = 62 [30%]) and hypertension (n = 42 [20%] vs n = 49 [23%]) or in incidence of vitamin D–associated toxicities. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with previously untreated mCRC, addition of high-dose vitamin D 3 , vs standard-dose vitamin D 3 , to standard chemotherapy plus bevacizumab did not improve PFS. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04094688
Changes in Prescribing Patterns in Stage III Colon Cancer
Walden, Daniel J., Larson, Joseph J. , Kang, Sandra , Griswold, Cassia R. , Ueberroth, Benjamin E. , Patel, Bhamini, Draper, Amber , Raman, Puneet , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Ahn, Daniel H. , Wu, Christina S., Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Griswold, Cassia , Ou, Fang‐Shu , Walden, Daniel J., Alese, Olatunji B. , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Wu, Christina

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | August 7, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 841-850.e4

10.6004/jnccn.2023.7028 Get It

Background: For patients with resected stage III colon cancer, 6 months of adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has been the standard of care. The IDEA collaboration aimed to evaluate whether 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy was noninferior to 6 months. Despite failing to meet its primary endpoint, the subgroup analyses demonstrated noninferiority based on regimen and treatment duration when a risk-stratified approach was used. Patients and Methods: To evaluate the impact of the results of the IDEA collaboration, we evaluated adjuvant chemotherapy prescribing practice patterns, including planned adjuvant treatment regimen and duration from January 1, 2016, to January 31, 2021. The time period was selected to evaluate chemotherapy prescribing patterns prior to the abstract presentation of the IDEA collaboration in June 2017 and after full manuscript publication in March 2018. Results: A total of 399 patients with stage III colon cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the analysis. A significant increasing trend for use of 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy was observed after presentation of the IDEA abstract (P<.001). A significant change in CAPOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) prescribing was also observed, increasing from 14% of patients prior to presentation of the IDEA abstract to 48% after presentation (P<.001). Comparing 3 months of CAPOX with 6 months of FOLFOX (fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin), 3 months of CAPOX use also steadily increased over time (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.20–1.37; P<.001). Among subgroups of interest, no differences in adoption of CAPOX were observed. The adoption of 3 months of CAPOX was similar in patients with low-risk cancer (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17–1.37) and those with high-risk cancer (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.16–1.47). Conclusions: Despite the IDEA collaboration failing to demonstrate noninferiority of 3 months’ duration of adjuvant therapy compared with 6 months, the findings have influenced practice prescribing patterns, favoring CAPOX and a shorter duration of planned adjuvant treatment.