Schulick, Richard

Background Screening individuals at increased risk for pancreatic cancer (PC) detects early, potentially curable, pancreatic neoplasia. Objective To develop consortium statements on screening, surveillance and management of high-risk individuals with an inherited predisposition to PC. Methods A 49-expert multidisciplinary international consortium met to discuss pancreatic screening and vote on statements. Consensus was considered reached if ≥75% agreed or disagreed. Results There was excellent agreement that, to be successful, a screening programme should detect and treat T1N0M0 margin-negative PC and high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm). It was agreed that the following were candidates for screening: first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with PC from a familial PC kindred with at least two affected FDRs; patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome; and p16 , BRCA 2 and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) mutation carriers with ≥1 affected FDR. Consensus was not reached for the age to initiate screening or stop surveillance. It was agreed that initial screening should include endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and/or MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography not CT or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. There was no consensus on the need for EUS fine-needle aspiration to evaluate cysts. There was disagreement on optimal screening modalities and intervals for follow-up imaging. When surgery is recommended it should be performed at a high-volume centre. There was great disagreement as to which screening abnormalities were of sufficient concern to for surgery to be recommended. Conclusions Screening is recommended for high-risk individuals, but more evidence is needed, particularly for how to manage patients with detected lesions. Screening and subsequent management should take place at high-volume centres with multidisciplinary teams, preferably within research protocols.

Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) affects over 44,000 people in the United States every year and carries a dismal prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of just 5%. A subset of these patients (5-10%) report a familial history of the disease. The genetic etiology in these familial cases is poorly defined, with known susceptibility genes, such as: BRCA2, PALB2, CDKN2A, BRCA1, PRSS1 and STK11, accounting for only 10-15% of familial pancreatic cancer. In an effort to identify previously unappreciated pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes, we used next generation sequencing technology to evaluate the whole genome and whole exome sequences of 16 (6 families) and 22 individuals (10 families) respectively. All of these families enrolled into one of the familial pancreatic cancer registries participating in the Pancreatic Cancer Genetic Epidemiology (PacGene) Consortium, all had at least three members with PDA, and DNA was available from at least two affected members in each kindred. Using this approach, we identified heterozygous, inactivating, ATM mutations in two kindreds with familial pancreatic cancer (c.8266A>AT; p.K2756X and c.170G>GA; p.W57X). These mutations were previously reported as disease causing variants in patients with ataxia-telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive condition resulting from bi-allelic deleterious mutations of ATM. Interestingly, heterozygotes of deleterious ATM mutations have an increased risk of breast cancer. However, there have been no previous reports of deleterious ATM mutations in the germline of familial PDA patients. In our study, mutations segregated with disease in both kindreds and tumor analysis demonstrated Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. Sequence analysis of the entire ATM gene in an additional 166 familial pancreatic cancer probands indentified four additional patients with deleterious mutations in the ATM gene (c.3214G>GT; p.E1072X, c.6095G>GA; p.R2032K, IVS41-1G>GT and c.3801delG), while no deleterious mutations were identified in 190 spouse controls (p=0.046). When considering only the mostly severely affected families, those with three or more pancreatic cancer cases, four deleterious mutations were found in 87 families (P=0.009). These results indicate that ATM mutations play an important role in familial pancreatic cancer predisposition and have significant implications in the management of affected individuals and the risk assessment of family members. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2628. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2628