Back to Authors

Noble, Jacob M.

0009-0007-2014-4852

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

Key Performance Indicators for Clinical Pharmacy Practice and Administration in Inpatient/Acute Care Settings: An Opinion of the Clinical Administration Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy
Mercado, Angela , Noble, Jacob M. , Irwin, Adriane N. , Badowski, Melissa E. , Bangalore, Nitish , Caliendo, G C, Chan, David C. M. , Dumont, Zachary J. , Groth, Christine M. , Humaideh, Mais Anis, Nguyen, TuTran , Salvatus, Marc , Sullivan, Jesse , Thambi, Mathew , Welch, R , Noble, Jacob , Sullivan, Jesse B , Welch, Ron W , Parrish, Richard H , Dumont, Zack , Caliendo, Gina, Thambi, Mathew , Parrish, Richard H.

JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY | July 11, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jac5.70252 Get It

ABSTRACT Key performance indicators (KPIs) are quantifiable measures that describe critical success factors of an organization. Their vital role in ensuring the delivery of quality health care services necessitates the development of KPIs relevant to inpatient clinical pharmacy practice. This opinion paper from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Clinical Administration Practice and Research Network (CADM PRN) describes the rationale, methodology, and outcomes of a consensus process to identify a focused set of inpatient/acute care clinical pharmacy KPIs. Leveraging a modified Delphi approach, the CADM PRN convened an Expert Panel of clinical pharmacy leader members to build a consensus‐driven set of KPIs reflecting clinical, operational, patient‐centered, and financial contributions of clinical pharmacists in the inpatient/acute care setting. From a previous ACCP White Paper, a total of 15 KPIs were identified across four domains: (1) clinical practice and patient safety, (2) clinical outcomes and readmissions, (3) medication education and patient engagement, and (4) financial and operational value. The CADM PRN posits that the establishment and implementation of standardized KPIs are essential for measuring and demonstrating the value of clinical pharmacy services in modern health care, offers pragmatic, consensus‐based KPIs for evaluating clinical pharmacy services supporting resource justification, and advancing the visibility and impact of pharmacists in acute care practice. As hospitals shift toward value‐based care, robust KPI frameworks will be critical for optimizing patient outcomes, supporting financial sustainability, and justifying appropriate staffing. Future efforts should focus on pilot testing, addressing implementation barriers, and achieving broader acceptance for KPIs across the profession.
Evaluation and comparison of infusion reactions related to prophylactic medication timing for taxane administration
Noble, Jacob , Irvine, Clay, Tevaarwerk, AJ, Cole, Kristin , Gander, Kathleen, Soefje, Scott A. , Mara, Kristin C. , Irvine, Clayton , Tevaarwerk, Amy, Soefje, Scott A , Noble, Jacob M. , Mara, Kristin C , Shah, Vishal

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice | January 21, 2025 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 787-791

10.1177/10781552241313058 Get It

Introduction Taxane medications, paclitaxel, and docetaxel, are chemotherapy agents that have a higher incidence of reported hypersensitivity and infusion reactions. To help classify these reactions, the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) is utilized. Prophylactic medications have been used to decrease the incidence and severity of these events. At our institution, medications that patients can receive prior to the initiation of a taxane infusion are a histamine 1 receptor antagonist (H1RA), histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), a steroid or a combination of these medications. The purpose of this retrospective review was to compare the rates and severity of infusion reactions based on the timing of prophylactic medication administration in the first and second doses of taxane infusions. Methods Patients who received paclitaxel or docetaxel from January 30 th , 2022, through January 30 th , 2023, were included in the analysis. To assist in the identification of a reaction, taxane administrations were flagged for review if a rescue medication was administered after the start of a paclitaxel or docetaxel infusion. The rates and severity of infusion reactions were analyzed based on the timing of prophylactic medication administration. A sub-group analysis comparing infusion reaction characteristics between taxanes given, was performed. Results Of the 1486 taxane infusions that were completed within the year, 249 infusion reactions were confirmed and graded utilizing the NCI CTCAE. When examining the first and second doses of a taxane (N = 536), we identified 222 infusions reactions. The odds of a patient having an infusion reaction, during the first and second doses, was found to be less likely for patients given a prophylactic medication 30 min prior to receiving a taxane compared to those who did not receive a pre-medication (p = 0.037). Conclusion This multisite retrospective study showed that administration of prophylactic medications 30 to 80 min prior to the first and second infusion of a taxane was the optimal timing to decrease the likelihood of patients having an infusion reaction. No difference in the severity of the reaction was seen. Most patients were able to complete the entire infusion, regardless of what rescue medications were used following the infusion reaction.