Qazi, Hassaan

e16027 Background: Postoperative oral intake after esophagectomy has traditionally been delayed due to concerns about anastomotic leakage. Although Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways increasingly support early feeding, its safety remains debated. This study compared early versus delayed oral feeding following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched through October 2025 for randomized controlled trials evaluating early oral feeding (postoperative days 0–3) versus delayed feeding (postoperative day ≥5) after esophagectomy. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leakage and pneumonia. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, gastrointestinal recovery, length of hospital stay, healthcare costs, and quality of life. Pooled risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs), or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Review Manager 5.4. Results: Thirteen trials involving 1,468 patients were included. Early oral feeding was not associated with increased anastomotic leakage (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.55–1.45; I² = 0%) and showed consistent safety across surgical approaches and anastomotic sites. The incidence of pneumonia was significantly reduced (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47–0.92; p = 0.01). Early feeding accelerated gastrointestinal recovery, including earlier first bowel movement (MD: −0.50 days, p < 0.00001) and passage of flatus (MD: −0.61 days, p = 0.0006). Hospital stay was shortened (MD: −1.89 days, p = 0.002), with lower medical costs (SMD: −1.19, p = 0.009). Quality-of-life measures improved, including global health status, dysphagia, pain, and swallowing function. Conclusions: Early oral feeding after esophagectomy appears safe and beneficial, reducing pulmonary complications and enhancing postoperative recovery. Further high-quality multicenter trials are needed to confirm these findings.