Allers, TM

Abstract Background: Age-related lobular involution (LI) is a physiological process, usually accelerated with menopause, in which the epithelial tissue of the breast gradually regresses. Our previous analysis of a cohort of more than 14,000 women who had a benign breast biopsy at the Mayo Clinic revealed that women who had undergone LI were at significantly reduced risk of subsequent breast cancer development. In our studies of postmenopausal women specifically, we found that more than 40% had not completed the process of LI, and that the increased breast cancer incidence in older women was strongly associated with incomplete LI. We sought to determine the potential protective mechanistic effects of lobular involution. Methods: We generated primary human mammary epithelial cell lines (HMECs) from breast biopsies of women who showed no LI (N = 6), partial LI (N = 7), or complete LI (N = 6). These cell lines were analyzed for proliferation in culture and profiled for genomic signatures using Affymetrix gene arrays. We also analyzed RNA isolated from a cohort of archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) benign breast biopsy samples from postmenopausal women who had either completed the process of LI (N = 4) or who had not initiated LI (N = 8) for genomic signatures using Whole-Genome DASL Assays. Results: We found that LI was associated with decreased cellular proliferation and inhibition of processes associated with tumor development and progression. Specifically, we found that HMECs derived from benign breast biopsies in which LI was not evident showed increased proliferation and elevated expression of Twist (p = 0.002), a transcription factor associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and breast cancer development. We are assessing differentially expressed genes for association with breast cancer risk using a nested case:control group of benign breast biopsies from women in our cohort who subsequently developed breast cancer (N = 85) vs those who did not (N = 142) and for whom LI status at the time of initial biopsy was known. Conclusions: LI may decrease cancer risk through inhibition of key tumorigenic processes. Identification of processes associated with the physiologic risk reduction seen with LI may provide insight into novel avenues for risk reduction. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-06-01.

Abstract Background: Women with hereditary breast cancer risk, who develop breast cancer, face complex surgical decisions related to their breast cancer and risk to their contralateral breast. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the factors influencing decision making in these women and degree of decision conflict before and after consultation with breast specialized physicians (BSP). Methods: Women with hereditary breast cancer risk and recently diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective decision making questionnaire study. Questionnaires were completed prior to their initial breast clinic visit and after consultation with a breast clinic physician, nurse educator and a breast surgeon. Results: 68 women completed both questionnaires. Mean age was 52 (range 27–84). Prior to meeting with BSP, 10 (15%) women reported having made a decision for the cancer side and 18 (26%) reported being close to deciding. Of the 20 who expressed a surgical preference prior to consultation, 5 (25%) changed their decision after meeting with the BSP [1 to mastectomy (MTX), 4 to breast conservation (BC)]. After consultation with BSP, 65 (96%) reported having made a decision (BC in 29 (45%), MTX in 35 (54%), unspecified in one). The most commonly cited reasons influencing surgical choice were doctor's advice (79%), family history of breast cancer (74%) and worrisome findings on biopsy (50%). Prior to meeting with BSP, 9 (13%) women reported having made a decision regarding screening and/or risk-reducing options for the contralateral breast and another 11 (16%) reported being close to a decision. The choices in these 20 women were screening only in 10 (50%), contralateral prophylactic MTX (CPM) in 3 (15%), CPM and oophorectomy in 2 (10%), other combinations of options in 4, and unspecified in 1. After meeting with the BSP, 49 (72%) reported having made a decision regarding the contralateral breast; this decision was for screening only in 21 (43%), CPM only in 9 (18%), screening plus tamoxifen in 7 (14%), CPM and oophorectomy in 2 (4%), other combinations of options in 8, and unspecified in 2. The most commonly cited reasons for choices on the contralateral side were: family history (81%), doctor's advice (78%), and worrisome findings on biopsy (43%); only 25% cited psychological or emotional reasons. For both the cancer and contralateral sides, decisional conflict was significantly lower after meeting with BSP than prior to meeting with BSP. Decision-conflict scale total scores (possible range 0–100; higher scores indicate more decisional conflict) summarized for each side and compared between timepoints Conclusion: The BSP consult and family history have the greatest influence on decision making among women with hereditary risk diagnosed with breast cancer. After consultation most women felt they had made decisions for both the cancer and contralateral sides and reported significantly lower decision conflict compared to prior to the consultation. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-05.