Sinicrope, Frank A.

3626 Background: For patients (pts) with dMMR stage III colon cancer, the addition of atezolizumab (atezo) to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) significantly improved disease-free survival in ATOMIC (NCT02912559). Here we present HRQOL data. Methods: Pts with surgically resected stage III dMMR colon cancer were randomized (1:1) to receive mFOLFOX6 + atezo (840 mg IV q2 weeks) for 12 cycles (6 months [mo]) followed by atezo monotherapy for 13 cycles (12 mo total) versus mFOLFOX6 for 12 cycles. HRQOL was an exploratory endpoint measured using the FACT-C (includes FACT-G), FACT/GOG-NTX, EQ5D-5L, and PRO-CTCAE. Optional participation was by paper surveys at trial registration, prior to treatment cycles 4 and 7, and at 6, 12, and 36 mo after registration. Mean changes from baseline (BL) were compared between treatment arms using general linear mixed models (negative mean changes indicate worsening). At 6 mo, a two-sided 95% confidence interval excluding a difference of 1.9 points (FACT/GOG-NTX) and 6 points (FACT-C Trial Outcome Index [TOI]) favoring the mFOLFOX6 arm would indicate non-inferiority of the addition of atezo. Rates of side effect bother (FACT-G item GP5) and pt-reported adverse events (AEs) by PRO-CTCAE (composite scores, baseline adjusted) were compared using Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Of 712 randomized pts, 581 (285 atezo+mFOLFOX6; 296 mFOLFOX6) consented to participate in the survey. Pts completed 2398/3021 (79%) of expected surveys across all time points (1218/1489 [82%] atezo+mFOLFOX6; 1180/1532 [77%] mFOLFOX6). The difference in mean changes from BL between arms indicated non-inferiority of the addition of atezo at 6 mo (table); differences remained small at 12 and 36 mo. No significant differences in mean changes from BL between arms were found at 6, 12, or 36 mo for any scale. At 6 mo, 16% vs 20% of pts in each arm reported at least “quite a bit” of side effect bother (p=0.34), favoring atezo. Across cycles, atezo was associated with higher rates of pt-reported itchy skin (62% vs 48%), cough (53% vs 43%), and shortness of breath (51% vs 41%) [all p<0.05]. Conclusions: Addition of atezo to mFOLFOX6 slightly increases pt-reported AEs, but its effect on HRQOL is minimal and not clinically meaningful. Results support tolerability of atezo+mFOLFOX6 as standard of care adjuvant treatment for pts with dMMR stage III colon cancer. Support: UG1CA189823, U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Genentech, a member of the Roche group; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical trial information: NCT02912559 . Scale Mo Mean change from BL – atezo+mFOLFOX6 Mean change from BL – mFOLFOX6 Diff (95% CI) FACT/GOG-NTX 6 -10.0 -10.6 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1) 12 -8.0 -9.4 1.4 (-0.2, 2.9) 36 -7.2 -6.9 -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4) FACT-C TOI 6 -4.1 -2.5 -1.6 (-3.7, 0.6) 12 2.1 1.8 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6) 36 0.7 1.8 -1.1 (-3.7, 1.5)

3525 Background: Tumor microenvironment (TME) features of colorectal cancer (CRC) may influence detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and further refine prognosis. We applied a deep learning histopathologic algorithm to quantify TME features in stage III colon cancers and evaluated their association with postoperative ctDNA status among participants in a phase III FOLFOX-based adjuvant trial (NCCTG N0147). Methods: QuantCRC (Aiforia Technologies) was applied to digitized hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images of stage III colon adenocarcinomas to extract quantitative histopathologic features. Among cases where data met quality control (N=1817), associations between 15 distinct pathologist-defined features and clinical outcomes—time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS)—were evaluated, stratified by postoperative ctDNA status assessed by a tissue-free assay (Guardant Reveal). Relationships were analyzed using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models that were adjusted for clinicopathologic and molecular features ( KRAS , BRAF V600E , MMR status). Interaction testing was performed. Results: We found statistically significant quantitative differences for histopathological features by ctDNA status. Features associated with ctDNA positivity(+) included lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and increased %high grade, %tumor budding, %necrosis, and %stroma. ctDNA+ cases had lower %inflammatory stroma and fewer %signet ring cells (all p< 0.006). Multivariable analyses, irrespective of ctDNA status, identified %tumor budding, %mucin, %signet ring cells, %inflammatory tumor bed, and %inflammatory stroma as significantly associated with adverse outcomes (TTR, DFS, OS). Within ctDNA+ cases, higher %immature tumor bed was associated with adverse outcome for all 3 variables. Among ctDNA-negative cases, significantly poorer outcomes (TTR, DFS, OS) were observed for tumors with lower tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density and reduced %necrosis. After adjustment, significant interactions with ctDNA status were observed for LVI (p< 0.006) and %signet ring cells (p< 0.035) across all outcome variables, for %necrosis with DFS, OS (p<0.040), and for TILs with TTR (p<0.015). Analysis is ongoing for ctDNA tumor fraction as well as tumor genotyping data (739 genes; Guardant360). Conclusions: QuantCRC identifies TME features associated with postoperative ctDNA status that enable risk-stratification within ctDNA groups. Among ctDNA-negative patients, reduced intratumoral TIL density and reduced tumor necrosis identify high-risk subgroups with inferior clinical outcomes, and may have clinical utility.