Ostrem, Jamie L.

Abstract Heat shock protein (HSP) 90 is a molecular chaperone that modulates stability of several client proteins, many of which are key regulators of signaling pathways in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The potential for simultaneously targeting multiple effectors makes HSP90 an appealing therapeutic target. Here, we evaluated the biological activity of HSP990, a novel HSP90 inhibitor (Novartis Pharma AG) in a panel of adult glioma primary xenograft lines (n=15). HSP990 treatment resulted in a dose-dependent growth inhibition with IC50 values in the low nM range in each of the primary lines. HSP990 caused G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis-induction within 72 hours of treatment. In addition, treatment with HSP990 resulted in up-regulation of HSP70, and decrease in activity of client proteins AKT, CDC2, CDC25C and activation of caspase 8 and 3, in tested cell lines. A range of sensitivity based on EGFR status was observed. EGFR-amplified cells showed depletion of client proteins and growth inhibition at lower dose of HSP990 (10nM) than wildtype EGFR cells (30nM). Furthermore, neurosphere formation assays revealed that HSP990 was effective against the growth of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) in 6 tested glioblastoma xenograft lines (IC50 less than 10nM).These results suggest that that both cell cycle effects and induction of apoptosis are mechanisms governing HSP990 activity against glioblastoma. Further studies are warranted to characterize the mechanisms by which HSP990 exerts its anti-glioma effects which in turn may provide valuable insights in developing HSP990 as a novel personalized GBM treatment based on specific molecular signatures. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2898. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-2898

Abstract Heat shock protein (HSP) 90 is a molecular chaperone that modulates stability of several client proteins, many of which are key regulators of signaling pathways in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The potential for targeting multiple effectors makes HSP90 an appealing therapeutic target for GBM. The biological activity of HSP990, a novel HSP90 inhibitor (Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as single agent was evaluated in a panel of short-term explant cultures derived from primary GBM xenografts (n=10). HSP990 treatment resulted in a dose-dependent growth inhibition in the all xenograft lines, with an IC50 ranging from 5 to 30 nM. A 72 h exposure to HSP990 (10–30 nM) resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the HSP90 client proteins Akt, Cdc2 and Cdc25C, a decrease in associated post-translational modifications p-Akt (S473), p-CDC2 (Y15), p-CDC25 (S216), and increased expression of HSP70. Additionally, a dose-dependent increase in HSP990-induced apoptosis (Annexin-V positivity), was observed within 24–72 hours of drug treatment. GBM tumors harbor a subpopulation of glioma stem cells that grow as neurospheres in neurobasal media and are considered important for tumor maintenance and progression. The effects of HSP990 were tested in neurospheres derived from 4 of the xenografts tested above (GBM12, GBM39, GB59, GBM12TMZ). These cultures demonstrated potential for tri-lineage differentiation upon serum challenge and had robust secondary neurosphere formation, demonstrating two hallmark features of cancer stem cells. In a bulk-culture neurosphere formation assay, co-incubation with 5 to 10 nM HSP990 was highly effective at suppressing neurosphere formation in all 4 xenograft lines. Notably, in GBM12 neurosphere cultures maintained in either serum-free media or challenged with serum, 30 nM HSP990 was equally effective at promoting up-regulation of HSP70, but exhibited less effect on Akt or Cdc2 in serum-free cultures as compared to cultures supplemented with serum. Incubation of serum-free neurosphere cultures with 5 nM HSP990 (5 days) resulted in increased glioneuronal differentiation exhibiting elevated GFAP, Oct-4 and beta-tubulin expression compared to untreated controls. To test ‘self renewal’ GBM12 neurospheres were treated with HSP990 (10, 30 nM) for 7 days followed by dissociation and plating equal numbers of viable cells at low density in fresh drug-free neurobasal media. Interestingly, HSP990 treatment did not affect the number of secondary neurospheres (surviving fraction: control = 1.00, 10 nM = 1.30, 30 nM = 1.05). Treatment of GBM12TMZ flank tumor xenografts with weekly HSP990 (13 mg/kg P.O.) resulted in a modest 9 day delay in tumor re-growth (40.3 and 49.3 respectively) compared to placebo treatment. In conclusion, HSP990 (a) had anti-proliferative, pro-apoptotic effect on differentiated serum-supplemented xenograft cultures (b) a pro-differentiation effect on serum-free GBM stem cell cultures (c) markedly suppressed neurosphere formation with prolonged drug exposure but not with more limited drug exposure (d) inhibited GBM growth in vivo. Thus, HSP990 may inhibit GBM growth both through direct growth inhibition and through pro-differentiation effects on GBM stem-like cells. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B100.

Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and highly malignant primary brain tumor in adults with a median survival just over 1 year, and novel therapies are urgently needed. Deregulation of the p16 (INK4A)-CDK4/6-pRb pathway are commonly found in human GBM patients and selective inhibitors of CDK4/6 may be specifically useful to suppress proliferation associated with these alterations. PD0332991 is an orally active small molecule that specifically inhibits CDK4 and CDK6. Therefore, the efficacy of PD0332991 was evaluated in the Mayo panel of primary GBM xenograft lines using short-term explant cultures. We hypothesized that expression of p15 and/or p16, endogenous inhibitors of CDK4/6 activity, would suppress the response of GBM tumors to PD0332991 treatment. To test this hypothesis, 2 GBM xenograft cell lines with wild-type p16/p15 levels (GBM5 and 28) and 2 lines without detectable p16/p15 levels (GBM22 and 43) were selected for further analysis. Tumor cells were treated with graded concentrations (10 nanoM to1 microM) of PD0332991 for 5 days and subjected to CyQUANT cell proliferation assays. Consistent with our hypothesis, treatment with 1 microM PD0332991 effectively inhibited cell proliferation to 56.6±3.5% (P<0.001) and 44.3±3.4% (P<0.001) of control in GBM22 and GBM43 cells respectively, but did not affect cell proliferation in GBM5 and GBM28 cells (98.7±15.6% and 101.8±12.0% of control, respectively). In addition, 1 microM PD0332991 induced G1-phase cell cycle arrest in GBM22 (treated 79.7±0.8% vs. control 63.4±0.5% of cells in G1 phase, P<0.001) and GBM43 (treated 70.6±1.1% vs. control 48.9±4.6% of cells in G1 phase, P<0.001) but not in GBM5 and GBM28 (treated 52.3±2.7% vs. control 54.0±5.1%, treated 52.4±4.7% vs. control 54.6±2.6%, respectively). The status of p15 and p16 was confirmed by RT-PCR, which demonstrated readily detectable expression of p15 and p16 in GBM5 and GBM28, but not in GBM22 and GBM43 cells. Additional comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data showed that CDKN2A and 2B (genes encode for p16 and p15 respectively) are homozygously deleted in GBM22 and 43, hemizygously deleted in GBM5 and normal in GBM28. We also examined the status of CDK4, CDK6, pRb and other molecules in the p16-CDK4/6-pRb pathway by Western, RT-PCR and CGH in these GBM lines and the data will be presented. We are now testing whether shRNA knockdown and/or re-expression of p15/p16 in the relevant cell lines alters their responsiveness to PD0332991. In conclusion, CDK4/6 inhibitor PD0332991 inhibits cell proliferation and induces G1 cell cycle arrest in p15/p16- null GBM tumors, but is less effective in p15/p16 expressing tumors. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):C191.