Smith, John-Rudolph

Background: Despite the growing clinical relevance of obesity in the context of multiligament knee injuries, there remains a paucity of data evaluating patient-reported outcomes in this population. Purpose: To compare clinical and functional outcomes, including postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complication/revision rates, of multiligament knee reconstruction (MLKR) in individuals with a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m 2 versus <30 kg/m 2 at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent MLKR between 2001 and 2022 at a single institution. Patients with a BMI >30 kg/m 2 were propensity-matched to patients with a BMI <30 kg/m 2 on a 1:1 basis by age, sex, laterality, and Schenck classification (knee dislocation). Medical records were reviewed for patient characteristics, time to surgery, year of surgery, number and type of ligament interventions, graft choice, single versus staged reconstruction, and concomitant injuries. Postoperative clinical examination findings and PROMs for each cohort, including visual analog scale score, Tegner activity scale score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, were analyzed and compared. Postoperative complication and revision rates were evaluated and compared. Results: Of 158 patients, 79 patients with a BMI <30 kg/m 2 (mean age, 31.0 ± 11.5 years; mean BMI, 25.8 ± 3.0 kg/m 2 ) were matched to 79 patients with a BMI >30 kg/m 2 (mean age, 32.8 ± 9.5 years; mean BMI, 37.1 ± 5.8 kg/m 2 ). There were no significant differences between cohorts regarding age, sex, laterality, and Schenck classification ( P ≥ .100); however, patients in the BMI >30 kg/m 2 group had greater numbers of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 7.5 ± 4.8 years for the BMI <30 kg/m 2 cohort and 7.2 ± 4.8 years for the BMI >30 kg/m 2 cohort ( P = .229). Patients with a lower BMI (<30 kg/m 2 ) had significantly better postoperative mean IKDC (79.3 ± 18.7 vs 67.9 ± 21.2; P = .004), Lysholm (85.1 ± 17.1 vs 75.7 ± 21.0; P = .007), and Tegner (5.1 ± 2.0 vs 4.4 ± 1.7; P = .041) scores. The BMI >30 kg/m 2 group also had significantly more postoperative complications ( P = .028). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 cohorts in terms of reoperation rate or conversion to total knee arthroplasty ( P ≥ .189). Conclusion: Patients who undergo MLKR and have a BMI >30 kg/m 2 demonstrate significantly decreased postoperative PROMs when compared to patients with a BMI <30 kg/m 2 . Increasing BMI significantly increased the incidence of complication rates after MLKR.

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common injury experienced by basketball players. Surgical management with arthroscopic labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty can lead to successful outcomes for athletes whose nonoperative management fails. Recent studies have demonstrated that athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy in the setting of FAI had favorable return-to-sport (RTS) and sport continuation outcomes. Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and RTS rates at minimum 5-year follow-up in basketball players after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All active basketball players at the recreational, high school, and collegiate levels who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair for FAI between August 2009 and December 2019 were identified. Postoperative RTS, revision rates, and surgery satisfaction at final follow-up were evaluated. PROMs were also analyzed as follows: visual analog scale, Tegner Activity Scale, modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, and Hip Outcome Score–Sport. Results: Fifty-three patients (64 hips) were included with a mean ± SD age of 21.2 ± 6.0 years. Most athletes played recreational or high school basketball (85%), while 15% played college basketball. Forty-three patients attempted to return to basketball. Of these patients, 35 (81%) returned to basketball after surgery, with 32 (91%) returning to the same level of play. Patients who returned to basketball had significantly improved outcomes on the modified Harris Hip Score ( P = .006), Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living ( P = .007), Hip Outcome Score–Sport ( P = .004), Tegner Activity Scale ( P = .010), and visual analog scale with use ( P = .041) as compared with those who did not return. High school athletes had decreased odds of RTS when compared with recreational athletes ( P = .01). There was significant improvement in all PROMs from baseline to minimum 5-year follow-up ( P < .05). Conclusion: At minimum 5-year follow-up, basketball players demonstrated durable improvements in PROMs and an RTS rate of 81% after hip arthroscopy for FAI. The majority of athletes returned to the same level of competition. There were significantly improved PROMs in patients who returned to sport versus those who did not. High school athletes had decreased odds of RTS when compared with recreational athletes. However, body mass index, sex, age, alpha angle, and basketball position did not significantly correlate with RTS outcomes.