Back to Authors

Gupta, Anshul

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0408-4072

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 1

Long‐Term Outcomes of Leadless Pacemaker vs. Transvenous Pacemaker in End‐Stage Renal Disease
Agarwal, Siddharth, Patel, Harsh P., Patil, Shivaraj, Gupta, Anshul , Patel, Divya, Asad, Zain Ul Abideen, Munir, Muhammad Bilal , Sugrue, A M, Tan, Nicholas Y. , Munoz, Freddy Del‐Carpio, Cha, Yong‐Mei, Deshmukh, Abhishek, Gupta, Anshul R , DeSimone, Christopher V , Munir, Muhammad Bilal , Agarwal, Siddharth , Patel, Divya, Asad, Zain Ul Abideen , Sugrue, Alan , Munoz, Freddy Del‐Carpio , Cha, Yong‐Mei , DeSimone, Christopher V. , Deshmukh, Abhishek

Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | May 26, 2026 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1599-1604

10.1111/jce.70364 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis have an increased risk of pacemaker‐related complications due to limited vascular access and increased susceptibility to infection. Leadless pacemakers (LPMs) may mitigate these risks compared with conventional transvenous pacemakers (TPMs), but long‐term comparative data in this population remain limited. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Research Network, including adults (≥ 18 years) with ESRD on dialysis who underwent LPM or TPM implantation between May 2016 and December 2020. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using demographics and comorbidities. Outcomes assessed over up to 5 years included all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure hospitalization, device re‐intervention, device‐related complications, infection‐related hospitalization, pacemaker‐induced cardiomyopathy, and all‐cause mortality. Results After matching, 901 patients were included in each group with well‐balanced baseline characteristics. LPM implantation was associated with a significantly lower risk of device re‐intervention compared with TPM (4.1% vs. 9.3%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.69; p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between groups in all‐cause hospitalization (65.5% vs. 68.3%; p = 0.22), heart failure hospitalization (26.9% vs. 30.2%; p = 0.13), all‐cause mortality (37.5% vs. 35.3%; p = 0.34), device‐related complications (14.5% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.94), infection‐related hospitalization (1.6% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.35), or pacemaker‐induced cardiomyopathy (9.0% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.66). Conclusion In a large, propensity‐matched cohort of patients with ESRD on dialysis, LPMs were associated with fewer device re‐interventions and comparable long‐term clinical outcomes compared with TPMs.