Conrad, P

Abstract Introduction Custom stents are a fast-evolving and revolutionary therapy for use in patients who require therapeutic stenting options due to a variety of tracheal, bronchial, and parenchymal diseases. The combination of increasing high-resolution CT imaging with 3-D printing technology has allowed for even greater flexibility in therapeutic treatment. Returned mesh is a well-described phenomenon in the medical literature and can create a wide variety of difficult to manage complications. Description The patient is a 64-year-old male with a past medical history of tracheobronchomalacia status post tracheoplasty with prolene mesh placement in April 2011 which was complicated by erosion of mesh through the membranous airway in April 2017. He subsequently underwent a right thoracotomy with a muscle flap reconstruction of the membranous trachea in May 2017. This was then complicated by a diverticulum of the distal trachea that was non-communicative with the esophagus and chronic stenosis of the left mainstem bronchus with residual mesh retained in the posterior membranous left mainstem bronchus. He had a custom Y-stent placed for the first time in February 2022 due to persistent sensation of shortness of breath along with productive cough. He experienced immediate relief after placement of his custom stent and has since demonstrated remarkable stability, rarely requiring unscheduled bronchoscopy for mucous clearance. He has nonetheless derived immense benefit from stenting from a symptomatic standpoint since initial placement in 2022. Discussion Customized stents utilizing 3-D printing technology have allowed far more flexibility to the clinical approach of patients with complex airway pathology. As tracheal and bronchial reconstruction surgeries continue to involve more complicated management modalities, including the use of mesh, complications will continue to arise. Mesh erosion is a potentially devastating complication from tracheobronchoplasty. It will, therefore, be important to facilitate treatment of complications from these and other modalities. Therapeutic bronchoscopy with custom stent placement will almost certainly continue to evolve as an effective tool in the management of patients such as these. This abstract is funded by: None

Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic exposed underrecognized structural deficiencies in pandemic preparedness across the US, particularly impacting marginalized and medically vulnerable populations. State leaders who were developing policies to allocate critical care resources, often called crisis standards of care (CSC), confronted challenges such as whether and how to incorporate age and chronic conditions into triage protocols, how to contend with imperfect illness acuity scores such as the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and whether essential worker status or area deprivation index (ADI) ought to confer an advantage during triage. To our knowledge, this is the first analysis to highlight CSC writers’ approach to ethical challenges, including from states whose policies provoked corrective action from the Office of Civil Rights (OCR). This study explores how state leaders navigated ethical controversies underlying states’ CSC policies, including whether those controversies were satisfactorily resolved. Methods Between February-September 2022 we conducted semi-structured interviews of public health leaders tasked with developing their states’ (CSC) policies. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and a codebook was developed iteratively, using inductively and deductively derived themes based on principles of grounded theory. The codebook was systematically applied to transcripts; disputes were resolved by consensus discussion among analytic team members. Results Leaders from 34 states were interviewed. Participants described how their states’ CSC policy writing committees considered the role of age in triage, some proposing age as a tiebreaker, or considering age only if coupled with measures of frailty or chronic illness, with others proposing age as an “exclusion criterion.” Many leaders acknowledged a controversial approach to disability in early versions of their policies, some describing how they responded to civil rights complaints. Participants described debates over whether pandemic triage decisions should advantage patients from underserved populations or affirmatively consider essential worker status or pregnancy. While most leaders regretted that early iterations of their policies stood to exacerbate health disparities, others described a less conciliatory response to civil rights complaints. In particular, triage exclusion criteria, whereby certain patients would be excluded outright from certain resources, provoked intense debate. Conclusion We describe ethical controversies that stymied CSC policy writing committees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Leaders described spirited debate around how age, disability, and justice ought to factor into triage; few described satisfactory resolution to those debates. Improved community engagement and adherence to civil rights protections in CSC are imperative to protect marginalized populations as we prepare for future calamites, whether global or local. This abstract is funded by: R03 AG73987; K76 AG88403