Back to Authors

Hedner, Thomas

Mayo Clinic

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension (S.T.T., G.L.S.) and Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics (K.R.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Medicine, Renal Division, Emory University S

Citations 2

Genomic Association Analysis of Common Variants Influencing Antihypertensive Response to Hydrochlorothiazide
Boerwinkle, Eric , O’Connell, Jeffrey R. , Bailey, Kent R. , Chapman, Arlene B. , McDonough, Caitrin W. , Beitelshees, Amber L. , Schwartz, Gary L. , Gums, John G. , Padmanabhan, Sandosh , Hiltunen, Timo P. , Citterio, Lorena , Donner, Kati , Hedner, Thomas, Lanzani, Chiara , Melander, Olle , Saarela, Janna , Wahlstrand, Björn, Manunta, Paolo , Kontula, Kimmo , Dominiczak, Anna F. , Johnson, Julie A. , Beitelshees, Amber L. , Turner, Stephen T. , Gong, Yan , Chapman, Arlene B. , Ripatti, Samuli , Cooper‐DeHoff, Rhonda M. , Padmanabhan, Sandosh , Dominiczak, Anna F.

Hypertension | June 11, 2013 | Volume: 62 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 391-397

10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.00436 Get It

To identify novel genes influencing blood pressure response to thiazide diuretic therapy for hypertension, we conducted genome-wide association meta-analyses of ≈1.1 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms in a combined sample of 424 European Americans with primary hypertension treated with hydrochlorothiazide from the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses study (n=228) and the Genetic Epidemiology of Responses to Antihypertensive study (n=196). Polymorphisms associated with blood pressure response at P <10 –5 were tested for replication of the associations in independent samples of hydrochlorothiazide-treated European hypertensives. The rs16960228 polymorphism in protein kinase C, α replicated for same-direction association with diastolic blood pressure response in the Nordic Diltiazem study (n=420) and the Genetics of Drug Responsiveness in Essential Hypertension study (n=206), and the combined 4-study meta-analysis P value achieved genome-wide significance ( P =3.3×10 −8 ). Systolic or diastolic blood pressure responses were consistently greater in carriers of the rs16960228 A allele than in GG homozygotes (>4/4 mm Hg) across study samples. The rs2273359 polymorphism in the GNAS-EDN3 region also replicated for same-direction association with systolic blood pressure response in the Nordic Diltiazem study, and the combined 3-study meta-analysis P value approached genome-wide significance ( P =5.5×10 −8 ). The findings document clinically important effects of genetic variation at novel loci on blood pressure response to a thiazide diuretic, which may be a basis for individualization of antihypertensive drug therapy and identification of new drug targets.
Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Study
Hedner, Thomas, Jamerson, Kenneth , Julius, Stevo, Haley, William E. , Zabalgoitia, Miguel, Butt, Amir R., Rahman, Syed N. , Hansson, Lennart, Kjeldsen, Sverre Erik

Hypertension | June 12, 2012 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1014-1020

10.1161/01.hyp.31.4.1014 Get It

Abstract —The Hypertension Optimal Treatment Study is a prospective trial conducted in 26 countries. The aims are to (1) evaluate the relationship between three levels of target office diastolic blood pressure (BP) (≤80, ≤85, or ≤90 mm Hg) and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients and (2) examine the effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of 75 mg aspirin daily versus placebo. A total of 19 193 patients between 50 and 80 years of age had been randomized by the end of April 1994. Treatment was initiated with felodipine 5 mg daily, and additional therapy was given in accordance with a set protocol. The present substudy of 926 patients performed in nine countries aimed to (1) compare home with office BP in a representative subsample of the HOT population after the titration of treatment was completed and (2) clarify whether the separation into the target groups could be expanded into the out-of-office setting. The differences between office and home measurements in diastolic BP of 0.2 mm Hg (SD, 9; 95% confidence interval, −0.36 to 0.81; P =.40) and systolic BP of 0.5 mm Hg (SD, 15; 95% confidence interval, −0.53 to 1.46; P =.21) were not significant. The group differences in home BP were 1.9 mm Hg (≤80 versus ≤85) and 1.2 mm Hg (≤85 versus ≤90) for diastolic BP (F=11.69; ANOVA, P <.0001) and 2.6 and 2.1 mm Hg for systolic BP (F=8.44, P =.0002). Thus, office and home BPs measured with the same semiautomatic device are comparable in treated hypertensive subjects in the HOT Study, and the separation into the target groups based on office readings prevails at home.