Objective The United Nations defines sustainability as meeting needs of the present without compromising future generations. While often equated to “saving the planet”, sustainability is a diverse topic. Healthcare generates >5% of CO 2 emissions worldwide, yet sustainability efforts in urology are limited. The North Central Section of the American Urological Association (NCSAUA) recently convened a Sustainability Task Force to address this topic. This study queried members on sustainability in urologic practice. Methods Following literature review on sustainability in surgery/urology, a 19-item anonymous REDCap survey was developed and distributed via email to NCSAUA members (N = 1607). The survey assessed current best practice, institutional/personal sustainability, and demographics. Responses were compiled and summarized using descriptive statistics. Results Survey response rate was 4.9% (79/1607). Respondents were most commonly from metropolitan areas (82%), male (71%), and in practice for 5–14 years (29%). Sustainability topics were prioritized as: (1) financial, (2) future workforce, (3) environmental. Over half (56%) reported no institutional sustainability programs or were unaware of them. Instrument (67%), computer (68%), and paper (65%) recycling were supported by a majority of respondents. However, only 28% and 29% of respondents reported current institutional use of instrument and computer recycling, respectively. Telemedicine was infrequent, with most urologists (58%) conducting 0-5% of visits virtually. Conclusions Current institutional and urologic practice emphasis on sustainability is low. Respondents ranked highest sustainability priorities as financial and future workforce. Efforts to address environmental sustainability were also supported, namely reduction of disposables and waste. The findings support the development of targeted programs to advance sustainability priorities widely.
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity Response to Mental Stress is Not Different between Females with a History of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection and Healthy Controls
Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a common type of myocardial infarction in females under the age of 50 years, caused by sudden separation between the coronary arterial wall layers and/or hematoma. The SCAD patient population is mostly females (~80%) with few or no traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors (e.g., obesity, hypertension). Common triggers for SCAD include sympathoexcitatory stimuli, such as intense physical and emotional stress. This implicates the sympathetic nervous system in the pathophysiology of SCAD. Thus, we aimed to investigate sympathetic nervous system responses to mental stress in patients with a history of SCAD. We hypothesized that females with a history of SCAD exhibit a greater increase in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) with acute exposure to mental stress compared to healthy females. Methods: Seven females with a history of SCAD (age: 48±9 yrs, BMI: 29±6 kg/m 2 ) and seven age- and BMI-matched healthy female controls (CON, age: 49±9 yrs, BMI: 26±6 kg/m 2 ) participated in the study (both p>0.05). MSNA was measured via peroneal microneurography during a 2-minute rest, a 5-minute Stroop Color Word Test aimed at inducing mental stress, and a 2-minute recovery. Heart rate (HR, 3-lead electrocardiography) and BP (finger photoplethysmography) were continuously recorded during each stage. Data are presented as an absolute change from rest (Δmean±SD). Two-way independent t-tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: Resting mean blood pressure (MBP, SCAD: 96±14 vs CON: 89±7 mmHg, p=0.27), heart rate (HR, SCAD: 56±11vs CON: 65±16 bpm, p=0.25), MSNA burst frequency (SCAD: 22±9 vs CON: 18±7 bursts/minute, p=0.40) and total MSNA (SCAD: 1135±471 vs CON: 951±245 au/min, p=0.41) were not different between the groups. During the Stroop Color Word Test, average changes in MBP (SCAD: Δ10±9 vs CON: Δ8±5 mmHg, p=0.67) and HR (SCAD: Δ11±7 vs CON: Δ14±5 bpm, p=0.35) were not different between the groups. Similarly, average changes in MBP (SCAD: Δ3±4 vs CON: Δ-2±5 mmHg, p=0.13) and HR (SCAD: Δ3±4 vs CON: Δ3±2 bpm, p=0.62) were not different during the recovery. Changes in MSNA burst frequency with the Stroop Color Word Test (SCAD: Δ1±7 vs CON: Δ6±7 bursts/minute, p=0.22) and recovery (SCAD: Δ0±5 vs CON: Δ4±4 bursts/minute, p=0.13) were not different between the groups. Total MSNA changes were also not different during the Stroop Color Word Test (SCAD: Δ267±335 vs CON: Δ606±432 au/min, p=0.15) and recovery (SCAD: Δ68±666 vs CON: Δ217±217 au/min, p=0.61) between the two groups. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that contrary to our hypothesis, sympathetic nervous system responses to acute mental stress exposure are not different between females with a history of SCAD and healthy females. Further investigation is needed to understand MSNA association with chronic stress exposure in females with a history of SCAD. Funding: NIH K23 HL155506 This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2026 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.