Back to Authors

Taylor, Rita L.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6276-0959

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 1

Reliability of remote self‐administered Web‐based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in‐person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test, and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite
Hughes, Morgan A., Frank, Ryan D. , Taylor, Rita L. , Fan, Winnie Z. , Christianson, Teresa J., Kremers, Walter K. , Stricker, John L. , Lucas, John A. , Aduen, Paula, Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Graff-Radford, Jonathan, Petersen, Ronald C., Aduen, Paula A., Kremers, Walter K , Hughes, Morgan A., Machulda, Mary M. , Hassenstab, Jason , Mielke, Michelle M. , Day, Gregory S. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Jack, Clifford R. , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Petersen, Ronald C. , Stricker, Nikki H.

Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring | May 11, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/dad2.70338 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION We describe the reliability of remote self‐administered digital cognitive measures completed via the Mayo Test Drive (MTD) web‐based platform. METHODS A total of 1846 participants (mean age = 70, SD = 12, range 31–101; 48% male; 96% White; 99% non‐Hispanic; 97% cognitively unimpaired) with two to four complete MTD sessions at ∼7.5‐month intervals were included. Test‐retest reliability was assessed using single‐rating, absolute‐agreement, and two‐way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals. ICCs for in‐person‐administered traditional neuropsychological measures were compared to MTD for a subset of 244 participants. Analyses also compared reliability across demographic, residential, and session context subgroups. RESULTS Reliability was good for the MTD Composite (total ICC = 0.79 [0.77, 0.80]), and moderate‐to‐good for the primary outcome variables for each MTD subtest (total ICCs 0.70–0.83 for Stricker Learning Span and Symbols). The reliability of the remote self‐administered MTD was similar to in‐person‐administered cognitive measures. DISCUSSION MTD showed moderate‐to‐good reliability, supporting its use in longitudinal monitoring.