Zhuang, Joyce

Background: A growing body of research has connected electronic health record (EHR) workload to physician burnout. In orthopedic surgery, burn-out rates are rising. This study analyzed orthopedic surgeons' EHR use by sex and practice experience. Materials and Methods: EHR activity was analyzed among attending orthopedic surgeons at a single institution from May 2022 to May 2023. Demographic information included self-reported sex and practice years. Outcomes included time spent in notes, orders, clinical review, and in-basket daily; time spent outside of scheduled clinical responsibilities; volume of in-basket messages received daily; and proportion of orders with team contributions. Multivariable linear regression compared outcomes by sex and practice years. Results: A total of 105 orthopedic surgeons were included (91% male; mean 15.5 ± 9.8 practice years). Female surgeons logged 31% more time in the EHR overall (62.2 vs 47.4 minutes daily; P = .05) and on unscheduled days (10.1 additional daily minutes; P = .03), and received more messages from patients (2.4 vs 1.0 messages daily; P = .002) compared to male surgeons. Senior surgeons spent significantly less time on documentation and orders ( P ≤ .048) and on unscheduled days (3.3 less minutes daily per practice decade; P = .013), and had more support with placing orders ( P < .001). Conclusion: Female sex and fewer practice years were associated with increased EHR use. Female orthopedic surgeons tended to have higher patient message volumes, whereas junior surgeons tended to have less team support, spending more time on orders and documentation. Given known factors contributing to burnout, these findings warrant further investigation into targeted interventions to improve physician EHR use.

Background: Gender-based reimbursement disparities in orthopedic surgery remain poorly understood, particularly when accounting for practice composition and setting. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate gender-based differences in Medicare reimbursement and practice patterns among female and male orthopedic surgeons. Methods: A cross sectional analysis of public Medicare data from 2013 to 2021 was performed. Outcomes included annual Medicare payments, submitted charges, total services, service categories, and beneficiaries treated by orthopedic surgeons who bill Medicare. Univariate and multivariable analyses quantified differences in payment, practice volume and composition, geographic adjustment, and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)-matched reimbursements. Results: A total of 29,357 orthopedic surgeons (27,442 men and 1,919 women) billed Medicare fee-for-service during the study period. Female surgeons, on average, submitted 48.3% fewer total charges and received 44.1% lower annual Medicare payments per surgeon compared with male surgeons. These differences persisted after multivariable regression adjusted for practice metrics and excluded top and bottom earners. Female surgeons also billed fewer services, treated fewer beneficiaries, and submitted fewer unique CPT codes. However, payment disparities persisted even after matching surgeons by volume of services, beneficiaries, and years in practice. Male surgeons performed higher volumes of all 10 highest-paying orthopedic CPT codes. In CPT matched analyses, female surgeons received lower reimbursement per service than male surgeons performing identical procedures. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the observed gender-based disparities in orthopedic surgery Medicare reimbursement cannot be explained by differences in volume, procedural mix, or geographic practice cost. Instead, they likely reflect a combination of structural and behavioral mechanisms described in prior literature that may influence how access to clinical opportunities, referrals, and reimbursement practices unfold in surgical practices. Variations in coding practices may represent an important focus for future investigation and targeted educational initiatives. Level of Evidence: Level III , Retrospective Cohort Study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1) are approved for type 2 diabetes treatment. Given the link between diabetes-associated metabolic inflammation and increased carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) risk, the aim of this study was to investigate development of CTS in diabetic patients who both were and were not taking GLP-1 therapy using a large claims database. Methods: A retrospective cohort study used a national claims database to identify diabetic patients. Those prescribed GLP-1 therapy were matched to controls by age, sex, comorbidity index, tobacco use, and obesity. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the 2-year CTS incidence, controlling for various health conditions and socioeconomic factors. Secondary analysis also evaluated the rate of carpal tunnel release (CTR) after being diagnosed with CTS. Results: Glucagon-like peptide-1 therapy significantly reduced 2-year CTS diagnosis risk (odds ratio [OR] 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.52; P < .001). Independent risk factors for increased CTS incidence included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoarthritis, coronary artery disease, depression, hypothyroidism, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Of patients who developed CTS, GLP-1 therapy was associated with increased odds of undergoing CTR (OR 1.23; 95% CI: 1.08-1.41; P = .002). Conclusions: Glucagon-like peptide-1 therapy is associated with decreased CTS risk in diabetic patients—potentially due to improved metabolic health—and increased odds of undergoing CTR once diagnosed. Further research is needed to clarify GLP-1 therapy’s role in reducing nervous system and musculoskeletal disease burden.