Meade, Gabriela

Abstract Clinical syndromes of frontotemporal dementia present both distinct and overlapping neuroimaging abnormalities and, consequently, domains of impairment. The aim of this study was to determine how well covariance patterns from multiple neuroimaging modalities discriminate across clinical frontotemporal dementia syndromes. Four-hundred participants with a clinical frontotemporal dementia diagnosis, including behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia, semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia, right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasia, apraxia of speech with agrammatic aphasia, primary progressive apraxia of speech, progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal syndrome, and 109 cognitively unimpaired participants underwent extensive neurological and neuropsychological assessments, structural MRI, flortaucipir-PET for tau and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-PET. Multimodal imaging covariance was investigated at the voxel-level using principal component analysis after adjusting for age and sex effects. Linear regression models were fit to investigate the relationship between principal components and clinical scores. Multinomial logistic regression models investigated the ability of imaging principal components to discriminate across syndromes. The first principal component, which describes the largest source of variability in the data, was a pattern of widespread cortical atrophy (21% variability explained) and of frontoparietal and temporal hypometabolism (21%): scores were lowest in behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia and correlated with general cognitive impairment. On tau-PET, the first principal component (43% variability) was not significantly different among syndromes and captured a widespread cortical tau uptake, with a focus on the temporal lobe. In all three modalities, the second principal component captured temporal lobe imaging abnormalities, contrasting the motor and semantic clinical syndromes. Subsequent components described smaller variability. On cross-validation, the classifiers based on principal components from MRI (multiclass area under the receiver operating characteristic: 0.76) and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (0.79) outperformed tau-PET (0.71), while combining all three modalities did not significantly improve the classifier performance. On cross-validation, the sensitivity of the image-based classifiers was heterogeneous across syndromes and modalities, with highest values for progressive supranuclear palsy and semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia and lowest for primary progressive aphasia and corticobasal syndrome. Our study found that the covariance components of structural and molecular neuroimaging underlying frontotemporal dementia clinical syndromes exist both as a continuum and with syndrome-specific patterns. More than one imaging model was able to correctly classify several frontotemporal dementia clinical syndromes with good specificity and sensitivity, highlighting the value of imaging in aiding patient diagnosis.

Background Frontotemporal dementia is an umbrella term that encompasses several clinical syndromes with impaired behavioral, language, and motor functions. These syndromes show considerable overlap in clinical features and imaging patterns. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the syndromic heterogeneity in FTD using unbiased data-driven approaches. Methods We used data-driven clustering analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data on 400 patients with clinical FTD diagnoses [behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia (rtvFTD), apraxia of speech with agrammatic aphasia (AOS-PAA), primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and primary progressive aphasia who did not fit into the other diagnostic categories (PPA-other)]. MR images were w-scored relative to cognitively unimpaired individuals, and principal component analysis was performed. A clustering ensemble approach, including hierarchical algorithms, was applied to the MR-based principal components, and imaging and clinical characteristics of the clusters were investigated. Various numbers of clusters ( K = 2, 3, or 4) were evaluated. Results The K = 3 solution offered the most clinically meaningful separation of FTD syndromes. The first cluster captured mostly frontal MRI abnormalities related to the speech, language and behavioral clinical dimensions, including patients with AOS-PAA, PPAOS, PPA-other, and bvFTD. The second cluster captured mostly temporal abnormalities and included mainly patients with svPPA and rtvFTD, but also bvFTD, AOS-PAA, and PPA-other. The third cluster captured cortical and subcortical atrophy, particularly in the midbrain, and included atypical Parkinsonian syndromes, with all PSP and CBS patients captured in this cluster, as well as most PPAOS patients. Considerable overlap of clinical syndromes was noted across these clusters, whereby patients with AOS-PAA, svPPA, PPA-other, and bvFTD were captured in more than one cluster. Discussion Our findings highlight heterogeneity in FTD, which mainly exists along three axes: speech, language and behavioral deficits reflecting frontal atrophy, language deficits reflecting temporal atrophy, and motor and motor speech deficits reflecting mostly midbrain and subcortical atrophy, with cortical involvement.