Frystyk, Jan

Abstract Poor growth in early life is associated with numerous adverse outcomes later in life. In 123 adolescents 16–18 yr of age, the previous findings of a positive relation between size in early life and later bone mass was confirmed. These associations were mediated by the current height and weight, but it was not confirmed that alterations of the GH–IGF axis cause this. Introduction: Numerous studies have found associations between low birth weight and disease later in life, including decreased bone mass. Materials and Methods: A longitudinal cohort of 16- to 19-year-old adolescents (n = 123) with data on third trimester fetal growth velocity (FGV) was assessed by serial ultrasound measurements, birth weight (BW), and weight at 1 yr. A follow-up study included DXA scan, anthropometric measurements, and measurements of the growth hormone (GH) –IGF-I axis in a representative subpopulation (n = 30). Results: BW and weight at 1 yr were positively associated with whole body BMC (p = 0.02 and p < 0.0001, respectively), lumbar spine BMC (p = 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively), and lumbar spine BMD (p = 0.04). After correction for adolescent height and weight, no association remained significant. There was no relation between IGF-I and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) levels in adolescence and size in early life or bone mass. In the subpopulation, GH secretion (median, 2.58 versus 4.05), GH pulse mass (median, 10.7 versus 19.4 mU/liter), and total GH (median, 74.9 versus 108.8 mU/liter/12 h) were decreased in the small for gestational age (SGA) group compared with the appropriate for gestational age (AGA) group; this did not reach statistical significance. Likewise, there were no differences in IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-1, −2, and −3 levels between the SGA and AGA groups. A statistically significant positive association between FGV and adolescent IGF-II was found (B = 199.9, p = 0.006). Significant negative associations between GH measurement and BMC, as well as BMD, were found (B = −0.008, p = 0.005 and B = −0.008, p = 0.006, respectively). Conclusions: This study confirms the previous findings of a positive relation between size in early life and later BMC, an association apparently independent of the distal part of the GH/IGF-I axis. However, this association may be mediated mainly by postnatal growth determining size of the skeletal envelope rather than an effect of fetal programming on bone mass per se.

The present study tests the clinical postulate that elevated testosterone (Te) and estradiol (E2) concentrations modulate the effects of constant iv infusion of saline vs. recombinant human IGF-I on free IGF-I, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1, and dimeric IGF-I/IGFBP-1 concentrations in healthy aging adults. To this end, comparisons were made after administration of placebo (Pl) vs. Te in eight older men (aged 61 ± 4 yr) and after Pl vs. E2 in eight postmenopausal women (62 ± 3 yr). In the saline session, E2 lowered and Te increased total IGF-I; E2 specifically elevated IGFBP-1 by 1.5-fold and suppressed free IGF-I by 34%; and E2 increased binary IGF-I/IGFBP-1 by 5-fold more than Te. During IGF-I infusion, the following were found: 1) total and free IGF-I rose 1.4- to 2.0-fold (Pl) and 2.1–2.5-fold (Te) more rapidly in men than women; 2) binary IGF-I/IGFBP-1 increased 3.4-fold more rapidly in men (Te) than women (E2); and 3) end-infusion free IGF-I was 1.6-fold higher in men than women. In summary, E2, compared with Te supplementation, lowers concentrations of total and ultrafiltratably free IGF-I and elevates those of IGFBP-1 and binary IGF-I/IGFBP-1, thus putatively limiting IGF-I bioavailability. If free IGF-I mediates certain biological actions, then exogenous Te and E2 may modulate the tissue effects of total IGF-I concentrations unequally.

During fasting, a lack of GH increases protein loss by close to 50%, but the underlying mechanisms remain uncertain. The present study tests the hypothesis that the anabolic actions of GH depend on mobilization of lipids. Seven normal subjects were examined on four occasions during a 37-h fast with infusion of somatostatin, insulin, and glucagon for the final 15 h: 1) with GH replacement, 2) with GH replacement and antilipolysis with acipimox, 3) without GH and with antilipolysis, and 4) with GH replacement, antilipolysis, and infusion of intralipid. Urinary urea excretion, serum urea concentrations, and muscle protein breakdown (assessed by labeled phenylalanine) increased by almost 50% during fasting with suppression of lipolysis. Addition of GH during fasting with antilipolysis did not influence indexes of protein degradation, whereas restoration of high FFA levels regenerated proportionally low concentrations of urea and decreased whole body protein degradation (phenylalanine to tyrosine conversion) by 10–15%, but failed to affect muscle protein metabolism. Thus, the present data provide strong evidence that FFA are important protein-sparing agents during fasting. The finding that inhibition of lipolysis eliminates the ability of GH to restrict fasting protein loss indicates that stimulation of lipolysis is the principal protein-conserving mechanism of GH.