Back to Authors

Meyer, Abby C.

Mayo Clinic

University of Minnesota

Citations 2

Disparities in Hearing Screening Practices in Minnesota Elementary Schools
Sajjadi, Autefeh , Kim, E S, Marcus, Kathryn S. , Todatry, Soorya, Hable, Nicholas, Roby, Brianne, Meyer, Abby C., Redmann, Andrew, Herd, Hannah, Maher, Rebecca, Chinnadurai, Siva, Nickel, Amanda , Jayawardena, Asitha , Kim, Elizabeth , Roby, Brianne , Todatry, Soorya , Hable, Nicholas, Roby, Brianne Barnett , Redmann, Andrew J. , Herd, Hannah

The Laryngoscope | April 29, 2026 | Volume: 136 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 4064-4071

10.1002/lary.70566 Get It

ABSTRACT Objective Identifying and addressing pediatric hearing loss is critical to supporting a child's development. School‐based hearing screening is a mainstay of timely identification of hearing loss. The objectives of this study were to characterize the current hearing screening practices in public, charter, and private elementary schools in Minnesota. Methods This was a cross‐sectional survey with data collected between March and June 2023. Surveys assessed the presence of standardized hearing screening processes and compliance with American Academy of Audiology (AAA) or Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) guidelines. Results About 146 public schools, 43 charter schools, and 60 private schools met inclusion criteria and responded to the survey. There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of standardized screening between school types ( χ 2 = 18.06; p < 0.001). Only 10.44% ( n = 26) of schools completed hearing screenings per AAA guidelines, and even fewer, 4.82% ( n = 12), completed hearing screenings according to MDH guidelines. The odds of screening per AAA or MDH guidelines were 3.50 times higher in charter schools compared to public schools (95% CI: 1.14, 10.73) and 4.61 times higher in private schools compared to public schools (95% CI: 1.73, 12.26). Conclusion There is a lack of standardization in hearing screening processes in Minnesota elementary schools. Adherence to screening per AAA or MDH recommendations is low in all types of elementary schools. Charter and private schools were more likely than public schools to screen per AAA or MDH guidelines. Overall, our data demonstrate an opportunity for improvement in school‐based hearing screening. Level of Evidence N/A.
Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children Using a Single‐Pass Tool with Moderate Sedation
Cofer, Shelagh A. , Meyer, Abby, Yoon, Daniel, Beebe, David S., Castro, Chandra, Rimell, Frank L., Belani, Kumar G. , Cofer, Shelagh, Meyer, Abby C.

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery | June 6, 2017 | Volume: 157 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 533-535

10.1177/0194599817707178 Get It

Insertion of tympanostomy tubes is a common elective pediatric surgical procedure and is typically performed under general anesthesia. The potential to reduce general anesthetic requirements for young children has led to increased interest in alternatives for tympanostomy tube placement. A tympanostomy tube system, developed to enable tympanostomy tube placement in a single pass on conscious patients under moderate sedation, was evaluated. A prospective study on 128 children and 253 tympanostomy tube placements conducted at 4 centers in the United States demonstrated an 88.3% success rate in performing the procedure under moderate sedation with adverse events within normal rates reported in the literature. The feasibility of completing tympanostomy tube placement under moderate sedation enables avoidance of general anesthesia and provides additional choices to physicians and parents.