Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs for Patients With Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis in the United States: A Retrospective Analysis of Health Insurance Claims Data
Abstract Purpose We evaluated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Methods Patients with newly diagnosed EGPA (2017–2021), ≥12 months’ pre-diagnosis health plan enrollment, and ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient claims with an EGPA diagnosis were included. Follow-up was from EGPA diagnosis until disenrollment or database end. HCRU and health insurer payment costs during follow-up were compared with those for matched cohorts of general insured patients without EGPA (comparison A) and without EGPA but with severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA; comparison B). Results In comparison A, all-cause HCRU was higher in the EGPA cohort (n = 213) versus matched patients (n = 779) for all clinical encounters/pharmacy claim types; annualized, mean total all-cause costs were 16-fold higher ($117,563/patient) versus matched patients ($7,520/patient). In comparison B, all-cause HCRU was higher for the EGPA cohort (n = 182) versus the matched SUA cohort (n = 640) for all clinical encounters/pharmacy claim types, with 5-fold higher mean total all-cause costs ($118,127/patient vs $22,286/patient). In both EGPA cohorts, HCRU and associated costs increased between the baseline and follow-up periods. Conclusions These findings highlight the need for more effective treatments to reduce the clinical and economic burden of EGPA.