Acker, Wayne R.

BackgroundNumerous studies have demonstrated the ability of angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to inhibit intimal hyperplasia after balloon dilatation of noncoronary arteries in small-animal models, suggesting an important role for Ang II in the response to injury. Although ACE inhibitors have not been similarly effective in nonhuman coronary models or in human restenosis trials, questions remain regarding the efficacy of ACE inhibitors against tissue ACE and the contributions of ACE-independent pathways of Ang II generation. Unlike ACE inhibitors, Ang II receptor antagonists have the potential to inhibit responses to Ang II independent of its biosynthetic origin.Methods and ResultsIn separate studies, three Ang II receptor antagonists, including AT1-selective (L-158,809), balanced AT1/AT2(L-163,082), and AT2-selective (L-164,282) agents, were evaluated for their ability to inhibit vascular intimal thickening in a porcine coronary artery model of vascular injury. Preliminary studies in a rat carotid artery model revealed that constant infusion of L-158,809 (0.3 or 1.0 mg·kg−1·d−1) reduced the neointimal cross-sectional area by up to 37% measured 14 days after balloon dilatation. In the porcine studies, animals were treated with vehicle or test compound beginning 2 days before and extending 28 days after experimental angioplasty. Left anterior descending, left circumflex, and/or right coronary arteries were injured by inflation of commercially available angioplasty balloons with placement of coiled metallic stents. Infusion of L-158,809 (1 mg·kg−1·d−1), L-163,082 (1 mg·kg−1·d−1), or L-164,282 (1.5 mg·kg−1·d−1) in the study animals yielded plasma drug levels sufficient either to chronically block or, for L-164,282, to spare pressor responses to exogenous Ang II. Neither L-158,809, L-163,082, nor L-164,282 had statistically significant effects (P=.12,P=.75, andP=.48, respectively, compared with vehicle-treated controls) on neointimal thickness (normalized for degree of injury) measured by morphometric analysis at day 28 after angioplasty.ConclusionsThese findings indicate that chronic blockade of Ang II receptors by either site-selective or balanced AT1/AT2antagonists is insufficient to inhibit intimal hyperplasia after experimental coronary vascular injury in the pig. The results further suggest that, unlike in the rat carotid artery, Ang II is not a major mediator of intimal thickening in the pig coronary artery.

Background—Previous studies in animal models of angioplasty have suggested a role in neointimal hyperplasia for endothelins (ETs), potent vasoconstricting peptides that also exert growth-promoting effects. The present studies were undertaken to test the hypothesis that endothelin receptor blockade can reduce neointimal thickening in injured porcine coronary arteries.Methods and Results—An ETA/ETBantagonist, L-749,329, was evaluated as an inhibitor of intimal thickening in a porcine balloon/stent model of coronary artery injury. L-749,329 competitively inhibited [125I]ET-1 binding to porcine ETA(IC50≈0.3 nmol/L) or ETB(IC50≈20 nmol/L) receptors and inhibited ET-1–stimulated signaling in cell culture. In anesthetized pigs, big ET-1–stimulated increases in systemic blood pressure were totally inhibited after intravenous infusion of L-749,329 (≥0.2 mg · kg−1· h−1). In vascular injury studies, pigs were treated with vehicle or L-749,329 (1 mg · kg−1· h−1) beginning 2 days before and continuing 28 days after experimental angioplasty. Left anterior descending, left circumflex, and/or right coronary arteries were injured by inflation of an angioplasty balloon wrapped with a coiled metallic stent. After 28 days, mean neointimal thickness in the L-749,329–treated group was reduced by 9.0% compared with vehicle-treated controls, but this effect was not statistically significant (P=0.13).Conclusions—Blockade of endothelin receptors for 28 days with only a mixed ETA/ETBreceptor antagonist is insufficient to substantially inhibit intimal hyperplasia after balloon/stent coronary artery injury in the pig, in contrast to results with a selective ETAantagonist. The effects of selective or mixed ETA/ETBantagonists in diseased vessels remain to be determined in this model.