Brown, Richard W.

Abstract Context. —The Joint Commission and the College of American Pathologists have emphasized improved communication as a strategy to improve patient safety and reduce errors. Objective. —To determine current policies and practices concerning critical and/or significant and unexpected results in anatomic pathology. Design. —A survey was distributed with the 2007 D mailing of the Performance Improvement Program slides. The survey included questions that determined laboratory size, practice setting, and anatomic pathology critical and/or significant and unexpected result policies and practices. Results. —Surveys from 1130 laboratories were received. A total of 75% had a written policy regarding anatomic pathology critical and/or significant and unexpected results; 25% did not. A total of 30% of laboratories with written policies stated that their policies included guidelines but did not include specific examples. A total of 33% listed 5 or fewer specific examples, 18% listed more than 5 examples, and 19% stated that they had a specifically defined list of significant and unexpected and/or critical diagnoses. The conditions that were listed included malignancies (48% of all laboratories), findings not expected by the clinical history (45%), life-threatening infections (45%), no chorionic villi in products of conception (37%), inflammatory or immunologic processes (19%), and organ rejection (14%). Laboratories with a higher median number of accessioned surgical and cytology cases and independent laboratories tended to have policies with more than 5 specific examples or precise lists of must-call diagnoses ( P < .001). Conclusions. —This survey illustrates current anatomic pathology policies and practices with respect to critical and significant and unexpected results.

The cardiovascular response to angiographic contrast medium was studied in 28 patients undergoing diagnostic angiocardiography under anesthesia. A transient phase of hypotension and tachycardia similar to that described by other authors was noted. Cardiac output was increased initially by 50 per cent and returned to the base line in 20 minutes. Peripheral blood flow increased by 100 per cent, apparently due to the direct effect of the hyperosmotic solution on the vascular smooth muscle. Hemodilution, maximal 2 to 4 minutes after injection of contrast medium, suggested a transient increase in circulating blood volume. Increased ventricular filling pressures, which were thought to be due to hypervolemia, were associated with increased left ventricular stroke work.

Clinical, hemodynamic, and angiocardiographic findings are described in seven cases of congenital mitral insufficiency. The volumes and changes in volume of the left atrium and left ventricle were calculated from the angiocardiograms and were found to be increased above the range of normal. Left ventricular stroke volumes thus obtained were compared with forward flows calculated from indicatordilution curves in order to quantitate regurgitant flow. Regurgitant flows varied between 19 and 94 per cent of the total left ventricular ejection volume, and forward flow was maintained as a result of a considerable increase in left ventricular volume. The left ventricular ejection volume was 50 to 64 per cent of the end-diastolic volume.