Idossa, Damé

e12697 Background: Postpartum-associated breast cancer (PABC) has been defined clinically as breast cancer (BC) diagnosed within the first 5 years of the most recent birth. Though generally rare, incidence rates are increasing in conjunction with delayed childbearing and older maternal age at first birth. Currently, there are limited data regarding serial patient-reported outcomes in this patient population compared to non-PABC patients. Methods: Patients with PABC from the Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry who completed baseline, 2, and 4-year surveys were matched 1:1 to BC patients whose cancers occurred more than 5 years after their most recent birth (or in the setting of nulliparity) based on age, clinical stage, treatment received, and tumor subtype. Survey results from the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10 (PROMIS-10), and Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) collected at approximately two and four years after diagnosis were compared between PABC and non-PABC patients. Univariable analyses used Wilcoxon rank sum tests, whereas multivariable analyses employed linear regression models adjusting for potential confounding effects. Results: A total of 222 individuals were included (111 with PABC). A higher proportion of individuals in the PABC cohort were married compared to the non-PABC cohort (80% vs. 42%, p < 0.001); otherwise, the groups were well-balanced across multiple categories, including age, gender, race/ethnicity, menopausal status, and germline mutation status. In univariable analyses, the Year 2 composite PHQ-2 score was significantly worse among individuals with non-PABC (p = 0.04), and the non-PABC cohort reported greater difficulty with sleep (p = 0.03) as measured by IES-R at Year 4. Both associations attenuated in a multivariable analysis controlling for marital status. In marital status-adjusted analyses of Year 4 survey results, PABC participants reported greater difficulty in carrying out social activities but were less likely to report emotional distress as evaluated by PROMIS-10 (compared with non-PABC participants). No other variables were significant univariably or multivariably (p > 0.05). Conclusions: In general, quality of life is similar among survivors of PABC compared to those diagnosed with breast cancer outside the postpartum period (or when nulliparous). However, our findings reveal that individuals with PABC are less likely to experience emotional distress 2 and 4 years after the BC diagnosis, which is unexpected, given that postpartum patients typically report higher levels of distress compared to their non-postpartum counterparts. Further investigation into these findings is warranted.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype characterized by lack of estrogen receptor expression, progesterone receptor expression, and human epidermal growth factor 2 overexpression/amplification. Given its generally aggressive biology, current guidelines recommend systemic therapy for most patients, with anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens being historically preferred. However, the clinical outcomes of patients with stage I TNBC and the benefit (or lack thereof) of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy have not been prospectively evaluated as this population has largely been excluded from prospective randomized clinical trials. As such, management decisions for stage I TNBC are typically extrapolated from trials enrolling patients with stage II or III TNBC or based on retrospective analyses. Currently, the primary factor influencing systemic therapy decisions is the anatomic stage, without other biomarkers clinically used to guide systemic therapy. This review summarizes the existing evidence supporting current and emerging systemic therapy strategies for stage I TNBC, with a special focus on treatment de-escalation and promising biomarkers that can advance personalized treatment selection.

The treatment paradigm of stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is rapidly evolving, with the recent incorporation of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improving disease outcomes. Nevertheless, almost one in five patients with early-stage TNBC will relapse in 5 years, underscoring an urgent need to identify and improve outcomes for those at high risk of recurrence. Novel therapeutic strategies including antibody-drug conjugates, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies, dual immune checkpoint blockade, and locoregional therapies to augment the antitumor immune response are being investigated in clinical trials. Biomarker strategies including tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, immune signatures, and circulating tumor DNA are being explored to identify patients at a high risk of relapse and to predict treatment response. In this article, we review recent advances in the management of stage II to III TNBC, highlight emerging investigational therapies and combinations, and explore novel biomarker strategies aimed at personalizing the care for patients with stage II to III TNBC.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by the lack of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression. Historically, treatment options for TNBC have been limited, because of the absence of actionable targets. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy improved outcomes for a subset of patients with metastatic PD-L1–positive disease; however, a critical need for more effective therapies remains. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been a promising advance in the management of advanced TNBC and are reshaping the landscape as they move earlier into the treatment algorithm. A greater understanding of the molecular heterogeneity of TNBC has enabled the pursuit of more targeted and personalized therapeutic strategies. Despite this, TNBC continues to have the least favorable outcomes compared with other breast cancer subtypes. This review highlights current evidence and future challenges in advanced TNBC, including optimizing therapeutic sequencing and the ongoing need for predictive biomarkers and novel agents.