Back to Authors

Bennett, William P.

Mayo Clinic

City Of Hope National Medical Center

Citations 2

Prognostic Implications of Molecular and Immunohistochemical Profiles of the Rb and p53 Cell Cycle Regulatory Pathways in Primary Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Burke, Louise , Flieder, Douglas B. , Guinee, Donald G., Brambilla, E., Freedman, Andrew N. , Bennett, William P., Jones, Raymond T., Borkowski, Andrew , Caporaso, Neil A., Fleming, Marian V., Trastek, Victor F., Pairolero, Peter C., Tazelaar, Henry D. , Midthun, David E. , Jett, James R., Harris, Curtis C. , Tazelaar, Henry D. , Liotta, Lance A. , Travis, William D.

Clinical Cancer Research | June 11, 2022 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 232-241

10.1158/1078-0432.232.11.1 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Many studies have highlighted the aberrant expression and prognostic significance of individual proteins in either the Rb (particularly cyclin D1, p16INK4A, and pRb) or the p53 (p53 and p21Waf1) pathways in non–small cell lung cancer. We hypothesize that cumulative abnormalities within each and between these pathways would have significant prognostic potential regarding survival. Experimental Design: Our study population consisted of 106 consecutive surgically resected cases of predominantly early-stage non–small cell lung cancer from the National Cancer Institute-Mayo Clinic series, and assessment of proteins involved both immunohistochemical (cyclin D1, p21Waf1, pRb, p16INK4A, and p53) and mutational analysis (p53) in relationship to staging and survival. Results: Cyclin D1 overexpression was noted in 48% of the tumors, p16INK4A negative in 53%, pRb negative in 17%, p53 immunopositive in 50%, p53 mutation frequency in 48%, and p21Waf1 overexpression in 47%, none with prognostic significance. Cyclin D1 overexpression in pRb-negative tumors revealed a significantly worse prognosis with a mean survival of 2.3 years (P = 0.004). A simultaneous p53 mutation dramatically reduced the mean survival time to 0.9 years (P = 0.007). Cyclin D1 overexpression with either a p53 mutation or a p53 overexpression was also associated with a significantly poorer prognosis (P = 0.0033 and 0.0063, respectively). Conclusions: Some cumulative abnormalities in the Rb and p53 pathways (e.g., cyclin D1 overexpression and p53 mutations) significantly cooperate to predict a poor prognosis; however, the complexity of the cell cycle protein interaction in any given tumor warrants caution in interpreting survival results when specific protein abnormalities are taken in isolation.
EGFR Somatic Mutations in Lung Tumors: Radon Exposure and Passive Smoking in Former- and Never-Smoking U.S. Women
Taga, Masataka , Mechanic, Leah E. , Hagiwara, Nobutoshi , Vähäkangas, Kirsi, Bennett, William P., Alavanja, Michael C.R., Welsh, Judith A., Diasio, Robert B. , Edell, Eric S. , Bungum, Aaron O., Jang, Jin Sung , Jen, Jin , Harris, Curtis C. , Ma, Khan , Lee, Adam M. , Yang, Ping

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | June 11, 2012 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 988-992

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-0166 Get It

Abstract Background: Patients with lung cancer with mutations in EGF receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase have improved prognosis when treated with EGFR inhibitors. We hypothesized that EGFR mutations may be related to residential radon or passive tobacco smoke. Methods: This hypothesis was investigated by analyzing EGFR mutations in 70 lung tumors from a population of never and long-term former female smokers from Missouri with detailed exposure assessments. The relationship with passive smoking was also examined in never-smoking female lung cancer cases from the Mayo clinic. Results: Overall, the frequency of EGFR mutation was 41% [95% confidence interval (CI), 32%–49%]. Neither radon nor passive-smoking exposure was consistently associated with EGFR mutations in lung tumors. Conclusions: The results suggest that EGFR mutations are common in female, never-smoking lung cancer cases from the United States, and EGFR mutations are unlikely due to exposure to radon or passive smoking. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(6); 988–92. ©2012 AACR.