Taylor, Herman A.

Abstract Exposure of biological systems to acute or chronic insults triggers a host of molecular and physiological responses to either tolerate, adapt, or fully restore homeostasis; these responses constitute the hallmarks of resilience. Given the many facets, dimensions, and discipline‐specific focus, gaining a shared understanding of “resilience” has been identified as a priority for supporting advances in cardiovascular health. This report is based on the working definition: “ Resilience is the ability of living systems to successfully maintain or return to homeostasis in response to physical, molecular, individual, social, societal, or environmental stressors or challenges ,” developed after considering many factors contributing to cardiovascular resilience through deliberations of multidisciplinary experts convened by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute during a workshop entitled: “ Enhancing Resilience for Cardiovascular Health and Wellness.” Some of the main emerging themes that support the possibility of enhancing resilience for cardiovascular health include optimal energy management and substrate diversity, a robust immune system that safeguards tissue homeostasis, and social and community support. The report also highlights existing research challenges, along with immediate and long‐term opportunities for resilience research. Certain immediate opportunities identified are based on leveraging existing high‐dimensional data from longitudinal clinical studies to identify vascular resilience measures, create a ‘resilience index,’ and adopt a life‐course approach. Long‐term opportunities include developing quantitative cell/organ/system/community models to identify resilience factors and mechanisms at these various levels, designing experimental and clinical interventions that specifically assess resilience, adopting global sharing of resilience‐related data, and cross‐domain training of next‐generation researchers in this field.

Background Combined severe proximal left anterior descending and proximal left circumflex coronary artery disease, or left main equivalent (LMEQ) disease, defines a prognostic high-risk angiographic subset of patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. While numerous observational and randomized clinical trials showed prolonged survival in surgically compared with medically treated patients with left main coronary artery disease, relatively few observational studies compared surgical and medical therapies in patients with LMEQ disease. The present report of 912 patients with LMEQ disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry extends the originally published 5-year surgical and medical group survival analysis to more than 16 years of follow-up and permits analysis of LMEQ patient subgroups. Methods and Results The CASS Registry contains 912 patients with LMEQ disease, defined as combined stenoses of ≥70% in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery before the first septal perforator and proximal circumflex coronary artery before the first obtuse marginal branch, initially treated with either surgical or nonsurgical therapy. The 15-year cumulative survival estimates were 44% for the 630 patients in the surgical group and 31% for the 282 patients in the medical group. Median survival in the surgical group was 13.1 years (12.7 to 14.1 years, 95% confidence limits) compared with only 6.2 years (4.8 to 7.9 years) in the medical group (difference, 6.9 years; P <.0001). Median survival was also significantly longer in the surgical group stratified by age, sex, anginal class, left ventricular (LV) function, and coronary anatomy. However, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery did not significantly prolong median survival in patient subgroups with (1) normal LV systolic function, even if a significant right coronary artery stenosis (≥70%) also was present, and (2) mildly abnormal (LV score, 6 to 10) LV systolic function. The 15-year cumulative survival in patients with normal LV systolic function in the surgical and medical groups was 63% and 54%, respectively. Median survival was >15 years in both the surgical and medical groups ( P =NS). In patients with normal LV systolic function and right coronary artery stenosis ≥70%, the 15-year cumulative survival was also similar in the surgical and medical groups (63% and 53%, respectively). Median survival was >15 years in both the surgical and medical groups ( P =NS). The 15-year cumulative survival estimates in all subgroups were affected by convergence of the surgical and medical group survival curves caused by a disproportionate increase in late surgical group mortality. Overall, 26% of patients in the medical group ultimately underwent CABG surgery. If all medical group patients had survived long enough, about 65% would be estimated to have had surgery by 15 years. When the CASS Registry patients with LMEQ disease who participated in the randomized trial or who were randomizable were analyzed, CABG surgery did not prolong the 15-year cumulative survival estimates compared with nonsurgical therapy for randomized (71% versus 67%, respectively) and for randomizable patients (62% versus 92%, respectively) with an LV ejection fraction ≥50%. Conclusions This report, which extends follow-up of more than 16 years in CASS Registry patients with LMEQ disease, shows that CABG surgery prolongs life in most clinical and angiographic subgroups. However, median survival was not prolonged by CABG surgery in patients with normal LV systolic function, even if a significant right coronary artery stenosis (≥70%) also was present or in patients with an LV ejection fraction ≥50% who participated in the CASS randomized trial or who were randomizable. These results extend our understanding of the natural history of LMEQ disease and permit a more accurate estimate of long-term surgical and medical group survival. These long-term results should allow clinicians to make more informed decisions about the best choice of treatment available for patients with similar clinical and angiographic features.

Background Observational and randomized studies designed to compare surgical and medical therapies in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCD) have shown that coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery prolongs life in most patients with LMCD. The present report of 1484 patients with LMCD in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Registry extends the originally published 5-year surgical and medical group survival analysis to more than 16 years of follow-up and permits analysis of LMCD patient subgroups. Methods and Results The CASS Registry contains 1484 patients with ≥50% left main coronary artery stenosis initially treated with either surgical or nonsurgical therapy. The 15-year cumulative survival estimates were 37% for the 1153 patients in the surgical group compared with 27% for the 331 patients in the medical group. Median survival in the surgical group was 13.3 years (12.8 to 13.8 years, 95% confidence limits) compared with only 6.6 years (5.4 to 7.9 years) in the medical group (difference, 6.7 years; P <.0001). Median survival was also significantly longer in the surgical group stratified by age, sex, anginal class, left ventricular (LV) function, coronary anatomy, and the extent of LMCD. However, CABG surgery did not significantly prolong median survival in patient subgroups with (1) left main coronary stenosis of 50% to 59%; (2) normal LV systolic function; (3) normal or mildly abnormal LV systolic function and a right coronary artery stenosis ≥70%; and (4) a nonstenotic (≤70%) right coronary artery. The 15-year cumulative survival for patients with normal LV systolic function in the surgical and medical groups was 42% and 51%, respectively. Median survival was 14.7 years in the surgical group and >15 years in the medical group ( P =NS). In patients with normal LV systolic function and a right coronary artery stenosis ≥70%, the 15-year cumulative survival rates were also similar in the surgical and medical groups (40% and 48%, respectively). Median survival was 14.3 years in the surgical group and 14.2 years in the medical group ( P =NS). The 15-year cumulative survival estimates for all subgroups were affected by convergence of the surgical and medical survival group curves owing to a disproportionate increase in the late surgical group mortality. Overall, 25% of patients in the medical group ultimately underwent CABG surgery. If all medical group patients had survived long enough, about 47% would be estimated to have had surgery by 15 years. Conclusions This report, which extends follow-up of more than 16 years in CASS Registry patients with LMCD, shows that CABG surgery prolongs life in most clinical and angiographic subgroups. However, median survival was not prolonged by CABG surgery in patients with normal LV systolic function, even if a significant right coronary artery stenosis (≥70%) also was present. These results extend our understanding of the natural history of LMCD and permit a more accurate estimate of long-term surgical and medical group survival.