Navale, Dravid

Abstract Background/Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common finding in patients with wild-type TTR amyloidosis. AF ablation represents a cornerstone of rhythm control in this population; however, the role of pulsed field ablation (PFA) remains unclear. Purpose This study aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of PFA for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with wild-type TTR amyloidosis. Methods We conducted a prospective data collection of consecutive patients who underwent PFA for AF and had a confirmed diagnosis of wild-type TTR amyloidosis. The study included three centres within a major US health system. All procedures were performed between May 2024 and May 2025. A standardised follow-up strategy was applied, including 48-hour Holter monitoring between 90 and 180 days after ablation. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of procedural complications. The primary efficacy outcomes were acute procedural success and AF-free survival at six months after a blanking period of 30 days. AF recurrence was defined as any electrocardiographically documented episode lasting more than 30 seconds. Results A total of 13 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 72.6 ± 4.8 years, and all patients were male. Three patients (23.1%) underwent an index "redo" ablation. Seven patients (53.8%) had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 [2, 4.5], with a mean ejection fraction of 50.4 ± 14.8% and a mean left atrial volume index of 47.6 ± 15.7 mL/m². Eleven patients underwent PFA with the pentaspline Farawave catheter, and two with the focal Sphere-9 catheter. Additional extra-pulmonary vein lesions were performed in 11 patients, including posterior wall ablation in ten patients, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in five, and mitral isthmus ablation in four patients. The primary endpoint occurred in one patient (7.7%) who developed acute respiratory failure complicated by pulseless electrical activity (PEA) arrest. The patient was successfully resuscitated but required prolonged hospital admission. All patients achieved acute pulmonary vein isolation, and six-month atrial fibrillation-free survival was 54.4%. Conclusion In this multicentre experience, pulsed field ablation (PFA) in patients with cardiac amyloidosis was feasible and acutely safe; however, the mid-term efficacy was suboptimal, with a relatively low six-month arrhythmia-free survival despite complete acute pulmonary vein isolation. These findings suggest that the current PFA strategies may not provide durable rhythm control in this population, underscoring the need for tailored ablation approaches and further research to improve long-term outcomes in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and atrial fibrillation.Figure 1

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is a widely used rhythm-control strategy, yet its role in reducing thromboembolic risk and enabling oral anticoagulation (OAC) discontinuation remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively synthesize and evaluate randomized controlled trial evidence supporting long-term antithrombotic strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating antithrombotic strategies after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. A frequentist network meta-analysis comparing reported treatment arms, along with a pooled incidence meta-analysis for outcomes of interest, was conducted. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials, including 3924 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Three trials compared long-term OAC continuation versus OAC discontinuation, and 1 compared OAC continuation with left atrial appendage occlusion after catheter ablation. No significant differences in stroke incidence were observed when comparing OAC or left atrial appendage occlusion with no antithrombotic therapy (incidence rate ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.02–33.85]; P =0.95; incidence rate ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.00–241.01]; P =0.94, respectively). Among patients who discontinued antithrombotic therapy without undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (n=1161), with 2864 cumulative person-years of follow-up, the pooled incidence of stroke was 0.23 events per 100 person-years (95% CI, 0.02–2.43; I 2 =0%). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reinforces that, across randomized data, the incidence of thromboembolic events in patients who discontinued OAC after successful ablation remained low. However, the evaluation of net clinical benefit is limited by the low number of events across all treatment arms, underscoring the need for larger studies with prolonged follow-up to further validate the safety of this strategy, particularly in higher-risk populations.