Godoy, Daniel Agustín

Moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a prevalent entity with a wide, dynamic, and heterogeneous injury spectrum. It has its own characteristics. However, it does not receive enough attention, as evidenced by the scarce representation in the literature and the absence of specific guidelines. Its changing epidemiological profile allows us to predict an increase in its incidence in the future, especially in the fragile population. Moderate TBI is not adequately categorized, and the risk of neuroworsening is elevated. The mortality of moderate TBI is not negligible and its functional outcomes are poor. Non-invasive neuromonitoring tools may have a key role in the initial evaluation and categorization of moderate TBI. Moderate TBI has cloudy, dark, and sunny aspects. To analyze these aspects and to propose management strategies constitute the main objective of this narrative review.

Moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a diagnosis that describes diverse patients with heterogeneity of primary injuries. Defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale between 9 and 12, this category includes patients who may neurologically worsen and require increasing intensive care resources and/or emergency neurosurgery. Despite the unique characteristics of these patients, there have not been specific guidelines published before this effort to support decision-making in these patients. A Delphi consensus group from the Latin American Brain Injury Consortium was established to generate recommendations related to the definition and categorization of moderate TBI. Before an in-person meeting, a systematic review of the literature was performed identifying evidence relevant to planned topics. Blinded voting assessed support for each recommendation. A priori the threshold for consensus was set at 80% agreement. Nine PICOT questions were generated by the panel, including definition, categorization, grouping, and diagnosis of moderate TBI. Here, we report the results of our work including relevant consensus statements and discussion for each question. Moderate TBI is an entity for which there is little published evidence available supporting definition, diagnosis, and management. Recommendations based on experts' opinion were informed by available evidence and aim to refine the definition and categorization of moderate TBI. Further studies evaluating the impact of these recommendations will be required.

Objective In certain situations, severe forms of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) show no response or continue to deteriorate after intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) infusion. It is unclear what the best treatment option would be in these circumstances.Method This is a case report on patients with severe axonal GBS in whom a second cycle of IVIg was used.Results Three patients on mechanical ventilation who presented axonal variants of GBS, with autonomic dysfunction, bulbar impairment and Erasmus score > 6, showed no improvement after IVIg infusion of 400 mg/kg/d for 5 days. After 6 weeks, we started a second cycle of IVIg using the same doses and regimen as in the previous one. On average, 5 days after the second infusion, all the patients were weaned off mechanical ventilation and showed resolution of their blood pressure and heart rate fluctuations.Conclusions A second cycle of IVIg may be an option for treating severe forms of GBS.

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) represents a devastating clinical event with high mortality and morbidity rates. Only few patients with sICH are treated with neurosurgical evacuation of the hematoma, and the majority of them need only a good conservative medical approach. The goal of medical treatment is to avoid secondary neurological and systemic complications. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents one of the most feared complications of sICH, and it is a potential cause of death. The balance between the benefit of VTE prevention and the risk of hematoma enlargement and/or rebleeding with the use of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis remains controversial because of the lack of consistent evidences in the literature. The efficacy of mechanical prophylaxis is also uncertain. Consequently, until now there are no clear guidelines and scientific evidences available for physicians in this field. The aim of this review is to analyze the available literature and guidelines about pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in patients with nonsurgical sICH.