Miron, Keren

ABSTRACT Background Long‐term health effects of thymectomy in adults remain uncertain. Previous reports suggested associations with increased mortality, cancer incidence, and autoimmune disease, although these findings may reflect differences in patient selection, surgical indication, or follow‐up duration. We aimed to examine long‐term outcomes following adult thymectomy. Methods We performed a propensity score‐matched retrospective study of patients who underwent thymectomy or comparator cardiothoracic procedures, with follow‐up extending to 10 years. Primary outcomes were all‐cause mortality, new‐onset malignancy, and autoimmune disease. Findings were compared with those reported in a recent study that has raised caution regarding thymic excision. Results We identified 425 patients who underwent thymectomy and 5401 controls who underwent coronary artery bypass or valve surgery. After matching, 398 patients remained in each group. Thymectomy was not associated with increased mortality at 5 years ( HR = 0.63; 95% CI , 0.38–1.04) or 10 years ( HR = 0.78; 95% CI , 0.54–1.13). Excluding reclassified thymic cancers, 5‐year extrathymic malignancy incidence was 2.3% versus 1.8% ( p = 0.54); no significant differences were observed in immune‐related disease. Mortality was higher among patients with thymic malignancy. Among MG patients, only one event occurred, precluding reliable estimation. Conclusions Thymectomy was not associated with excess mortality or malignancy at 10 years compared with matched cardiothoracic controls. Indication‐stratified analyses within the thymectomy cohort showed higher mortality for thymic malignancy, with insufficient events to assess outcomes in MG patients. These findings do not support a generalized survival penalty from thymectomy, though caution is warranted for incidental thymic removal.

Abstract Most clinical large language model (LLM) benchmarks rely on clean, concise vignettes that do not reflect the noisy, long-form documentation typical of real clinical records. How LLM performance degrades under realistic chart conditions remains poorly characterised. Here we test whether structured retrieval workflows protect National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scoring accuracy under systematic context stress. Using 100 de-identified acute stroke cases and a fully crossed 4 x 4 x 3 x 3 condition matrix (144 conditions per case), we vary context acquisition method, document length, distractor load and critical-information position across four Gemini models (57,047 retained runs). Structured retrieval reduces mean absolute error (MAE) from 4.58 to 2.96 points relative to non-agentic baselines (mean gain 1.62 MAE points; 95% CI 1.57–1.67; 35% relative reduction), with consistent gains across all 36 stress combinations. Lower-cost models show disproportionately larger gains (2.76 versus 0.45 MAE points). Tool-retrieved pipelines outperform retrieval-augmented generation in 33 of 36 combinations. These findings indicate that retrieval architecture, rather than model scale alone, is a tractable lever for robust, equitable clinical LLM deployment.