Back to Authors

Chao, Calvin

Mayo Clinic

Tempus Labs (United States)

Citations 1

Landscape of somatic genetic alterations and PAM50 intrinsic subtypes in breast cancer associated with germline pathogenic variants in DNA-repair genes
Yadav, Siddhartha , Reid, Sonya , Yilma, Binyam , Fragkogianni, Stamatina, Whisenant, Jennifer G. , Weidner, Anne , Rajagopal, Padma Sheila , Huang, Minxuan , Mauer, Elizabeth , Arafa, Ali T., Chao, Calvin, Antonarakis, Emmanuel S, Kurian, Allison, Couch, Fergus J, Pal, Tuya, Kurian, Allison W. , Mauer, Elizabeth , Arafa, Ali T. , Arafa, Ali , Teslow, Emily A , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S , Kurian, Allison W , Couch, Fergus J. , Pal, Tuya , Yadav, Siddhartha , Fragkogianni, Stamatina , Weidner, Anne , Chao, Calvin Y. , Teslow, Emily A. , Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. , Couch, Fergus J. , Pal, Tuya

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | March 11, 2026 | Volume: 118 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1416-1424

10.1093/jnci/djag070 Get It

Abstract Background The association of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (GPVs) in hereditary breast cancer genes with underlying tumor biology and clinical outcomes remains incompletely understood. This study characterized differences in somatic alterations and intrinsic subtypes between sporadic and hereditary breast cancers associated with GPVs in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, or PALB2. Methods This retrospective cohort study included women with breast cancer and an ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, or PALB2 GPV who had undergone tumor sequencing and whole transcriptome RNA expression analysis. Clinicopathological features, intrinsic subtypes, somatic alterations, and survival were compared by GPV status and immunohistochemistry-defined subtype and to sporadic cases. All statistical significance tests were 2-sided. Results The 4988 women with breast cancer in this study included 98 BRCA1, 126 BRCA2, 74 PALB2, 54 ATM, and 83 CHEK2 GPVs. Compared with sporadic cases, hormone receptor–positive/(ERBB2) formerly HER2–negative tumors in BRCA1 GPVs were statistically significantly enriched for basal subtype (45.5% vs 11.4%; P < .001), while CHEK2 carriers had a higher prevalence of luminal A subtype (80.4% vs 60.3%; P = .006). In hormone receptor–positive/(ERBB2)-negative breast cancers, BRCA1 GPVs were enriched for TP53 alterations (84.6% vs 29.8%; q < 0.001), ATM GPVs with FGFR1 alterations (35.4% vs 12.7%; q = 0.04), and BRCA2 GPVs with APC alterations (10.1% vs 1.5%; q = 0.004). Conversely, BRCA2 GPVs were inversely associated with PIK3CA alterations (13.0% vs 34.1%; q = 0.005) and CHEK2 GPVs with TP53 alterations (8.0% vs 29.8%; q = 0.02). Conclusions The GPVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2 are associated with distinct intrinsic breast cancer subtypes and somatic genomic alterations. These findings may enhance precision in risk stratification and guide personalized treatment strategies.